Genetic correlations between lean growth and litter traits in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs1

2003 ◽  
Vol 81 (7) ◽  
pp. 1700-1705 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Chen ◽  
T. J. Baas ◽  
J. W. Mabry ◽  
K. J. Koehler
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Lean Growth ◽  
Litter Traits

Selection for components of efficient lean growth rate in pigs 2. Selection pressure applied and direct responses in a Landrace herd

1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Cameron ◽  
M. K. Curran
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Correlated Response ◽  
Selection Line ◽  
Control Line ◽  
Direct Response ◽  
Lean Growth ◽  
Ad Libitum ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Ad Libitum Feeding

AbstractResponses to divergent selection for lean growth rate with ad-libitum feeding (LGA), for lean food conversion (LFC) and for daily food intake (DFI) in Landrace pigs were studied. Selection was practised for four generations with a generation interval ofl year. A total of 2642 pigs were performance tested in the high, low and control lines, with an average of 37 boars and 39 gilts performance tested per selection line in each generation. The average within-line inbreeding coefficient at generation four was equal to 0·04. There was one control line for the DFI and LFC selection groups and another control line for the LGA selection group. Animals were performance tested in individual pens with mean starting and finishing weights of 30 kg and 85 kg respectively with ad-libitum feeding. The selection criteria had phenotypic s.d. of 32, 29 and 274 units, for LGA, LFC and DFI, respectively, and results are presented in phenotypic s.d.Cumulative selection differentials (CSD) were 5·1, 4·5 and 5·5 phenotypic s.d. for LGA, LFC and DFI, respectively. Direct responses to selection were 1·4,1·1 and 0·9 (s.e. 0·20) for LGA, LFC and DFI. In each of the three selection groups, the CSD and direct responses to selection were symmetric about the control lines. The correlated response in LFC (1·1, s.e. 0·19) with selection on LGA was equal to the direct response in LFC. In contrast, the direct response in LGA was greater than the correlated response (0·7, s.e. 0·18) with selection on LFC. There was a negative correlated response in DFI (-0·6, s.e. 0·18) with selection on LFC, but the response with selection on LGA was not significant (0·2, s.e. 0·16).Heritabilities for LGA, LFC and DFI ivere 0·25, 0·25 and 0·18 (s.e. 0·03), when estimated by residual maximum likelihood, with common environmental effects of 0·12 (s.e. 0·02). Genetic correlations for LFC with LGA and DFI were respectively positive (0·87, s.e. 0·02) and negative (-0·36, s.e. 0·09), while the genetic correlation between DFI and LGA was not statistically different from zero, 0·13 (s.e. 0·10). Selection on components of efficient lean growth has identified LGA as an effective selection objective for improving both LGA and LFC, without a reduction in DFI.

Selection for lean growth rate and correlated responses in litter traits in a synthetic line of Yorkshire-Meishan pigs

2001 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Chen ◽  
T. J. Baas ◽  
J. C. M. Dekkers ◽  
L. L. Christian
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Regression Coefficients ◽  
Correlated Response ◽  
Selection Line ◽  
Control Line ◽  
Correlated Responses ◽  
Lean Growth ◽  
Litter Traits ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Synthetic Line

Selection for lean growth rate (LGR) was conducted for four generations in a synthetic line of Yorkshire-Meishan pigs to study the effectiveness of selection for LGR and correlated responses in litter traits. Lean growth rate was estimated from ultrasound measurements of 10th-rib backfat thickness and longissimus muscle area. In the selection line, 7 boars and 20 gilts with the highest LGR were selected to produce the next generation. The generation interval was 13 mo and the average selection differential per generation was 1.1 phenotypic standard deviation units. A contemporaneous control line was maintained by randomly selecting 5 boars and 15 gilts. Data from a total of 1057 pigs sired by 58 boars and out of 133 sows were available from the two lines. Selection responses were estimated from deviations of the selection line from the control line using least squares (LS) and by multiple trait derivative-free restricted maximum likelihood analysis using an animal model (AM). The estimate of response to selection per generation using LS was 9.4 ± 0.95 g d–1 for LGR. The corresponding estimate from the AM was 9.8 ± 0.51 g d–1. Correlated responses in litter traits were regressed on generation. For the LS method, regression coefficients were negative but not significant (P > 0.05) for total number born, number born alive, and number at 21 d and at 42 d. Significant, positive correlated responses occurred in 42-d litter weight and 21-d piglet weight (P < 0.05). For the AM method, the regression coefficients were also negative, but were not significant (P > 0.05) for numberalive at birth, at 21 d, and at 42 d. A significant positive correlated response occurred only for 42-d litter weight (P < 0.05). Although results are based on a population of limited size, it can be concluded that selection for LGR in a synthetic line is effective and should have little effect on litter traits. Key words: Pigs, selection, lean growth rate, correlated response

scholarly journals Genetic relationships between visual and objective measures of carcass composition in crossbred lambs

1999 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 553-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. E. Jones ◽  
G. Simm ◽  
W. S. Dingwall ◽  
R. M. Lewis
Keyword(s):  
No Value ◽  
Genetic Relationships ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Carcass Composition ◽  
Objective Measures ◽  
Lean Growth ◽  
Combining Data ◽  
Heritability Estimates ◽  
Using Data

AbstractThe aim of this study was to estimate genetic and phenotypic (co)variances between objective measures and carcass visual scores, as a test of the potential value of visual scores in selection programmes to improve carcass composition in crossbred lambs. In each of 1986, 1987 and 1988, 22 Suffolk rams were chosen with either high or low scores on an index designed to increase lean growth rate. These rams were joined with 18 to 20 crossbred ewes each and their lambs were grown on grass to one of three target live weights (35·5, 41·5 and 47·0 kg) for slaughter. The carcasses of 1881 lambs were visually scored for overall conformation and fatness using the standard Meat and Livestock Commission methods. Additionally, a more detailed 15-point scale assessment of conformation and a direct visual score of subcutaneous fat on the carcass were taken on 1252 lambs during the latter 2 years of the study. Carcass composition was estimated by dissection of a shoulder joint into lean, fat and bone. The possibility of combining data collected on lambs slaughtered at each of the three target live weights, for the estimation of genetic parameters was investigated. Results indicated that heritability estimates for a trait using data collected within each of the slaughter groups were homogeneous. Genetic correlations between records collected for a trait within each of the slaughter groups were not significantly different from one. These results indicated that data collected at each of the target slaughter weights could justifiably be combined. Heritability estimates were generally higher for shoulder tissue proportions (0·3) than for visual scores (0-2). Genetic correlations between all conformation scores and tissue proportions were not significantly different from 0 and therefore of little or no value in predicting carcass composition. Genetic correlations between visual scores of fat and both tissue proportions and ratios were generally high (around 0·65). These results suggest that fat scores collected on crossbred animals could be valuable in purebred selection programmes where improving carcass composition of the crossbred generation is the underlying objective.

The use of product traits such as lean growth rate as selection criteria in animal breeding

1987 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Simm ◽  
C. Smith ◽  
R. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Genetic Parameters ◽  
Selection Index ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Or Efficiency ◽  
Economic Values ◽  
Lean Growth ◽  
Component Traits ◽  
Economic Selection

ABSTRACTIn meat animals there is some interest in lean growth rate or lean food conversion efficiency as selection criteria. These traits may be estimated as the product of growth rate (or efficiency), killing-out proportion and carcass lean proportion. When used as selection criteria these product traits do not require estimates of genetic parameters or economic values for component traits. Hence, they may be more stable, and of longer-term use than classical economic selection indices. The purpose of this study is to compare expected responses to selection on product traits with expected responses from selection, either on individual component traits, or on an economic selection index. Formulae were derived for predicting the phenotypic and genetic correlations between a product and one component, and for predicting the heritability of the product trait; these depend on the coefficients of variation and heritabilities of components, and on the genetic correlations among them. When the coefficient of variation of one component is much higher than that of the other, (× 3), this component will tend to dominate the product trait. In cattle and sheep, and to a lesser extent in pigs, killing-out proportion and leanness are usually less variable than growth rate or efficiency. Thus, in many cases, there is little loss in response in lean growth (or lean efficiency) from selection solely on growth rate (or efficiency) regardless of leanness. Although product traits do not require derivation of economic values, their component traits do have implied economic values. Often more appropriate weightings will be given to components by using an economic selection index, even when economic values and genetic parameters are not estimated precisely.

The performance of Hereford × Friesian offspring of bulls selected for lean growth rate and lean food conversion efficiency

1992 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Bishop ◽  
J. S. Broadbent ◽  
R. M. Kay ◽  
I. Rigby ◽  
A. V. Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Conversion Ratio ◽  
Carcass Composition ◽  
Control Line ◽  
Food Conversion ◽  
Breeding Values ◽  
Lean Growth ◽  
Food Conversion Ratio

AbstractThe performance of Hereford × Friesian calves sired by Hereford bulls selected for either lean growth rate (LGR) or lean food conversion ratio (LFCR), or by unselected Hereford bulls, was evaluated on 327 calves on three farms over 2 years. Animals started test at 130 days of age on average and remained on test for approximately 300 days, whereupon all animals were slaughtered and carcass dissections were undertaken. Individual food intake was measured on tioo of the farms (189 animals), but only intake per pen of animals was measured on the third farm and individual food intake had to be estimated. LGR, LFCR and other traits describing performance were calculated from the growth, food intake and carcass composition data.If no breed or environment interactions exist it is expected that proportionately 0-5 of the genetic differences between selected and control line bulls would be transmitted to their offspring. For the LGR and LFCR line bulls these values were 0·38 and 0·44, respectively, however the LGR value had a much smaller confidence interval. Genetic correlations derived from regressing breeding values predicted from offspring performance on breeding values predicted from the bulk's own performance in the selection experiment were 0·62 (s.e. 0·28) and 0·96 (s.e. 0·28) for LGR and LFCR, respectively. Heritabilities were: live-weight gain on test, 0·27; daily gain, 0·48; food intake, 0·06; food conversion ratio, 0·46; predicted carcass lean content, 0·10; killing-out proportion, 0·10; LGR, 0·36 and LFCR, 0·48.

scholarly journals Genetic parameters and predicted response to selection for lean growth in an Australian commercial nucleus pig herd

2000 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Hong Nguyen ◽  
Cam P. McPhee ◽  
Claire M. Wade ◽  
Brian G. Luxford
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Genetic Parameters ◽  
Average Daily Gain ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Genetic Response ◽  
Lean Growth ◽  
Derivative Free ◽  
Total Data ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Daily Gain

Genetic parameters for performance traits in a pig population were estimated using a multi-trait derivative-free REML algorithm. The 2590 total data included 922 restrictively fed male and 1668 ad libitum fed female records. Estimates of heritability (standard error in parentheses) were 0.25 (0.03), 0.15 (0.03), and 0.30 (0.05) for lifetime daily gain, test daily gain, and P2-fat depth in males, respectively; and 0.27 (0.04) and 0.38 (0.05) for average daily gain and P2-fat depth in females, respectively. The genetic correlation between P2-fat depth and test daily gain in males was –0.17 (0.06) and between P2-fat and lifetime average daily gain in females 0.44 (0.09). Genetic correlations between sexes were 0.71 (0.11) for average daily gain and –0.30 (0.10) for P2-fat depth. Genetic response per standard deviation of selection on an index combining all traits was predicted at $AU120 per sow per year. Responses in daily gain and backfat were expected to be higher when using only male selection than when using only female selection. Selection for growth rate in males will improve growth rate and carcass leanness simultaneously.

Genetic and phenotypic parameters for litter traits of D'Man ewes

1991 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Boujenane ◽  
M. Kerfal ◽  
M. Khallouk
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Correlation Method ◽  
Phenotypic Correlations ◽  
Litter Traits ◽  
Genetic And Phenotypic Correlations

ABSTRACTA total of 1754 records for litter traits of 458 D'man ewes sired by more than 45 rams were analysed to estimate repeatability, heritability and genetic and phenotypic correlations. Repeatability estimated by the intraclass correlation method was 0·11, 0·11, 0·12 and 0·15 for litter sizes at birth and at weaning and litter weights at birth and at weaning, respectively. Paternal half-sib estimates of heritability were 0·09 (s.e. 0·06), 0·04 (s.e. 0·05), 0·15 (s.e. 0·07) and 0·08 (s.e. 0·05), respectively. Genetic correlations among the traits were all positive and varied from 0·17 to 0·72, whereas phenotypic correlations ranged from 0·68 to 0·86.

Sensitivity to dietary lysine: energy content in pigs divergently selected for components of efficient lean growth rate

2003 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.D. Cameron ◽  
G.B. Garth ◽  
J.C. Penman ◽  
A. Fiskin
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Performance Test ◽  
Energy Content ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Performance Testing ◽  
Energy Utilization ◽  
Selection Line ◽  
Diet Choice ◽  
Genetic Merit ◽  
Lean Growth

AbstractThe sensitivity to dietary lysine: energy content of pigs from lines divergently selected over seven generations for components of efficient lean growth rate was quantified by the within-selection line regression of performance test traits on diet class. Large White pigs were performance tested over three 14-day test-periods starting at 30, 50 and 75 kg and offered, to appetite, isoenergetic diets differing in dietary total lysine: energy (0•59, 0•69, 0•81, 0•91, 1•01, 1•12 and 1•23 g/MJ digestible energy (DE)). Within each litter, full-sibs were performance tested on different diets. Pigs were also performance tested on a diet-choice procedure using diets with total lysine: energy of 0•69 and 1•12 g/MJ DE to determine the correlation between performance on phase-feeding and diet-choice.The study consisted of 578 animals with 459 pigs tested with phase-feeding and 119 tested on diet-choice procedures. The study detected significant selection line and dietary effects on performance test traits, but no significant between-selection line differences in sensitivity to dietary total lysine: energy. When combinations of performance test traits were transformed into predicted lysine and energy utilization traits there were significant selection line effects on predicted nutrient allocation, but not in responses to increasing dietary total lysine: energy. The lack of between-selection line differences in sensitivity to dietary total lysine: energy indicated that the consequences of changing dietary total lysine: energy will be broadly similar across a range of genotypes, as spanned by the selection lines of the study.Genetic correlations between performance traits of phase-fed and diet-choice pigs suggested that predictions of genetic merit will be similar with animals tested on either procedure between 30 and 75 kg but post 75 kg predicted genetic merit for growth rate and lysine intake should be estimated separately for performance on diet-choice or for performance on a given diet. In contrast, predicted genetic merit for fat deposition with performance testing on diet-choice will be highly correlated with predicted genetic merit with testing on a single diet.

Grassland performance of Hereford cattle selected for rate and efficiency of lean gain on a concentrate diet

1993 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Bishop
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Performance Test ◽  
Growth Traits ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Food Conversion ◽  
Live Weight Gain ◽  
Lean Growth ◽  
Hereford Cattle ◽  
Selection For

AbstractThe performance of 273 Hereford calves from lines previously selected for lean growth rate (LGR) or lean food conversion efficiency (LFCR), on a concentrate diet, was evaluated on a grassland diet over a period of 3 years. Both bull and heifer calves were tested, and each year the performance test ran from the 1st week of May (average age of 233 days) until the 1st week of October. Carcass lean content was predicted from body weight and ultrasonic backfat depth, and lean gain was calculated from the product of live-weight gain and predicted carcass lean content. The LGR line was superior to the control (C) line for live-weight gain on test, lean gain on test and lean gain from birth until the end of test. The LFCR line performed similarly to the C line for live-weight gain on test and lean gain on test, but was inferior for total lean gain. For lean gain on test, the proportional differences between the lines were similar to those predicted from parental breeding values for LGR, but they were smaller for total lean gain. The lines did not differ significantly for either fat depth or predicted carcass lean content.Heritabilities were high for all growth traits, e.g. 0·52 (s.e. 0·17), 0·54 (s.e. 0·17) and 0·59 (s.e. 0·17) for live-weight gain on test, lean gain on test and total lean gain, but lower for fat depth and carcass lean content, 0·25 (s.e. 0·17) and 0·14 (s.e. 0·16), respectively. Genetic correlations with LGR, measured on a concentrate diet, were 0·57 for lean gain on test and 0·56 for total lean gain. If only males were considered, these correlations rose to 0·80 and 0·70, respectively. Coheritabilities between the two environments for lean growth were close to 0·3. It is concluded that although there is some evidence for genotype × environment and genotype × sex interactions, selection for lean growth on a concentrate regimen will still be effective in improving grassland performance.

Genetics of food intake in the pig

1989 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 41-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Webb
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Selection Strategy ◽  
Selection Regime ◽  
Lean Growth ◽  
Optimum Selection ◽  
Ad Libitum ◽  
Selection For

AbstractThe rôle of voluntary food intake, measured as daily food consumption on ad libitum feeding from 30 to 90 kg live weight, in future selection strategy is reviewed. Intake shows a heritability of 0.3, and genetic correlations of 0.6 with growth rate and –0.4 with leanness. Low genetic correlations between test station and commercial farm performance are reported for growth rate (0.27) and backfat (0.41) which arise either from genotype × feeding level interactions, or from individual feeding at stations. Selection for rate of lean growth appears to lead to a primary increase in rate of protein deposition, whereas selection for efficiency of lean growth appears to lead to a reduction in rate of fat deposition via a decline in intake. Continued reduction in intake may limit further improvement in lean growth rate and sow productivity. As optimum fatness is approached, the selection emphasis is expected to swing towards rate of lean growth to reduce total food used for maintenance. To determine the optimum selection regime, a knowledge is required of the genetic relationship between intake and lean growth rate. Meanwhile, the optimum selection regime may involve ad libitum group feeding with electronic recording of individual food intake. In the long term, exogenous or endogenous growth promoters could remove the need for selection against backfat, and necessitate a radical genetic increase in intake.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document