CORRELATION BETWEEN INTERLEUKIN-6 AND C-REACTIVE PROTEIN SERUM LEVEL IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS PATIENTS

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Awalia Awalia
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Serum Level ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Interleukin 6 ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Protein Serum

scholarly journals POS0765 LABORATORY RATIOS: A SUBROGATE BIOMARKER FOR DETECTION OF INFECTION IN SLE PATIENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 636.1-636
Author(s):  
Y. Santamaria-Alza ◽  
J. Sanchez-Bautista ◽  
T. Urrego Callejas ◽  
J. Moreno ◽  
F. Jaimes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Predictive Capacity ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Reactive Protein

Background:The most common complication in patients with SLE is infection, and its clinical presentation is often indistinguishable from SLE flares. Therefore, laboratory ratios have been evaluated to differentiate between those events. Among them, ESR/CRP1, neutrophil/lymphocyte (NLR)2, and platelet/lymphocyte (PLR)3 ratios have been previously assessed with acceptable performance; however, there is no validation of those ratios in our SLE population.Objectives:To examine the predictive capacity of infection of the lymphocyte/C4 (LC4R), lymphocyte/C3 (LC3R), and ferritin/ESR (FER) ratios in SLE patients, and to evaluate the performance of ESR/CRP, NLR, AND PLR ratios in our SLE population.Methods:We conducted a cross-sectional study of SLE patients admitted to the emergency service at Hospital San Vicente Fundación (HSVF). The HSVF ethics committee approved the execution of the project.Patients were categorized into four groups according to the main cause of hospitalization: (1) infection, (2) flare, (3) infection and flare and, (4) neither infection nor flare.We calculated the median values of the ratios and their respective interquartile ranges for each group. Then, we compared those summary measures using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Subsequently, we assessed the predictive capacity of infection of each ratio using ROC curve. Finally, we carried out a logistic regression model.Results:A total of 246 patients were included, among them 90.7% were women. The median age was 28 years (IQR: 20-35 years). Regarding the outcomes, 37.0% of the patients had flares, 30.9% had neither infection nor flare, 16.7% had an infection and, 15.5% had simultaneously infection and flare. When compared the four groups, statistical significance (p<0.05) was observed. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for infection prediction was as follows: 0.752 (sensitivity 60.5%, specificity 80.5%) for LC4R, 0.740 (sensitivity 73.2%, specificity 68.3%) for FER, 0.731 (sensitivity 77.6%, specificity 80.5%) for LC3R.In the logistic regression modeling, we observed that an increase in the risk of infection was associated with an LC4R below 66.7 (OR: 6.3, CI: 2.7 – 14.3, p <0.0001), a FER greater than 13.6 (OR: 5.9, CI: 2.8 – 12.1, p <0.0001) and an LC3R below 11.2 (OR: 4.9, CI: 2.4 – 9.8, p <0.0001).The ESR/CRP and PLR performed poorly with an AUC of 0.580 and 0.655, respectively. In contrast, the NLR showed better performance (AUC of 0.709, with a sensitivity of 80.2% and specificity of 55.7%).Figure 1.ROC curves of the evaluated ratiosConclusion:These laboratory ratios could be easy to assay and inexpensive biomarkers to differentiate between infection and activity in SLE patients. The LC4R, FER, and LC3R have a significant diagnostic performance for detecting infection among SLE patients. Of the ratios previously evaluated, ESR/CRP, LPR, NLR, only the latest has an adequate performance in our population.References:[1]Littlejohn E, Marder W, Lewis E, et al. The ratio of erythrocyte sedimentation rate to C-reactive protein is useful in distinguishing infection from flare in systemic lupus erythematosus patients presenting with fever. Lupus. 2018;27(7):1123-1129.[2]Broca-Garcia BE, Saavedra MA, Martínez-Bencomo MA, et al. Utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio plus C-reactive protein for infection in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2019;28(2):217-222.[3]Soliman WM, Sherif NM, Ghanima IM, EL-Badawy MA. Neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratios in systemic lupus erythematosus: Relation with disease activity and lupus nephritis. Reumatol Clin. 2020;16(4):255-261s.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

C-reactive Protein Is a More Sensitive and Specific Marker for Diagnosing Bacterial Infections in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Compared to S100A8/A9 and Procalcitonin

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 728-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
HYOUN-AH KIM ◽  
JA-YOUNG JEON ◽  
JEONG-MI AN ◽  
BO-RAM KOH ◽  
CHANG-HEE SUH
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Specific Marker ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Reactive Protein

Objective.C-reactive protein (CRP), S100A8/A9, and procalcitonin have been suggested as markers of infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We investigated the clinical significance of these factors for indication of infection in SLE.Methods.Blood samples were prospectively collected from 34 patients with SLE who had bacterial infections and 39 patients with SLE who had disease flares and no evidence of infection. A second set of serum samples was collected after the infections or flares were resolved.Results.CRP levels of SLE patients with infections were higher than those with flares [5.9 mg/dl (IQR 2.42, 10.53) vs 0.06 mg/dl (IQR 0.03, 0.15), p < 0.001] and decreased after the infection was resolved. S100A8/A9 and procalcitonin levels of SLE patients with infection were also higher [4.69 μg/ml (IQR 2.25, 12.07) vs 1.07 (IQR 0.49, 3.05) (p < 0.001) and 0 ng/ml (IQR 0–0.38) vs 0 (0–0) (p < 0.001), respectively]; these levels were also reduced once the infection disappeared. In the receiver-operating characteristics analysis of CRP, S100A8/A9, and procalcitonin, the area under the curve was 0.966 (95% CI 0.925–1.007), 0.732 (95% CI 0.61–0.854), and 0.667 (95% CI 0.534–0.799), respectively. CRP indicated the presence of an infection with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 90%, with a cutoff value of 1.35 mg/dl.Conclusion.Our data suggest that CRP is the most sensitive and specific marker for diagnosing bacterial infections in SLE.

scholarly journals The diagnostic values of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in identifying systemic lupus erythematosus infection and disease activity

Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (33) ◽  
pp. e16798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Wang ◽  
Rong Niu ◽  
Lijuan Jiang ◽  
Yuetao Wang ◽  
Xiaonan Shao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Diagnostic Values
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document