The influence of blastocyst formation time on the pregnancy outcomes of vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer according to the number of embryo transferred

Author(s):  
Sun Hee Shin ◽  
Jeong-ho Cha
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuxia He ◽  
Shiping Chen ◽  
Jianqiao Liu ◽  
Xiangjin Kang ◽  
Haiying Liu

Abstract Background High-quality single blastocyst transfer (SBT) is increasingly recommended to patients because of its acceptable pregnancy outcomes and significantly reduced multiple pregnancy rate compared to double blastocyst transfer (DBT). However, there is no consensus on whether this transfer strategy is also suitable for poor-quality blastocysts. Moreover, the effect of the development speed of poor-quality blastocysts on pregnancy outcomes has been controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the effects of blastocyst development speed and morphology on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes during the frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle of poor-quality blastocysts and to ultimately provide references for clinical transfer strategies. Methods A total of 2,038 FET cycles of poor-quality blastocysts from patients 40 years old or less were included from January 2014 to December 2019 and divided based on the blastocyst development speed and number of embryos transferred: the D5-SBT (n = 476), D5-DBT (n = 365), D6-SBT (n = 730), and D6-DBT (n = 467) groups. The SBT group was further divided based on embryo morphology: D5-AC/BC (n = 407), D5-CA/CB (n = 69), D6-AC/BC (n = 580), and D6-CA /CB (n = 150). Results When blastocysts reach the same development speed, the live birth and multiple pregnancy rates of DBT were significantly higher than those of SBT. Moreover, there was no statistical difference in the rates of early miscarriage and live birth between the AC/BC and CA/CB groups. When patients in the SBT group were stratified by blastocyst development speed, the rates of clinical pregnancy (42.44 % vs. 20.82 %) and live birth (32.35 % vs. 14.25 %) of D5-SBT group were significantly higher than those of D6-SBT group. Furthermore, for blastocysts in the same morphology group (AC/BC or CA/CA group), the rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth in the D5 group were also significantly higher than those of D6 group. Conclusions For poor-quality D5 blastocysts, SBT can be recommended to patients because of acceptable pregnancy outcomes and significantly reduced multiple pregnancy rate compared with DBT. For poor-quality D6, the DBT strategy is recommended to patients to improve pregnancy outcomes. When blastocysts reach the same development speed, the transfer strategy of selecting blastocyst with inner cell mass “C” or blastocyst with trophectoderm “C” does not affect the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 2478-2487
Author(s):  
Jiayi Wu ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
Yanping Kuang ◽  
Qiuju Chen ◽  
Yun Wang

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does cell number on Day 3 have an impact on pregnancy outcomes in vitrified-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER A low Day 3 cell number (≤5 cells) was independently associated with decreased live birth rate (LBR) during single blastocyst transfer cycles in young women. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Day 3 cell number is an effective predictor of IVF success rates when transferring cleavage stage embryos. However, the association between Day 3 blastomere number and pregnancy outcomes after blastocyst transfer is still unknown. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A retrospective cohort study of 3543 patients who underwent frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfers from January 2013 to June 2018 at a tertiary-care academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Patients were grouped into six groups according to the Day 3 cell number: ≤4 cells, 5 cells, 6 cells, 7 cells, 8 cells and >8 cells. The primary outcome measure was LBR. A logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the independent association between Day 3 blastomere number and LBR after adjustment for some potential confounders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In women <35 years old, the LBR varied significantly according to Day 3 cell number, with the rate of 31.2%, 34.4%, 41.9%, 45.1%, 48.1% and 48.2% for the ≤4-cell, 5-cell, 6-cell, 7-cell, 8-cell and >8-cell groups, respectively (P < 0.001). This significant difference was also observed in the high- and low-quality blastocyst subgroups of young women. However, for women ≥35 years old, the rate of live birth was similar between groups. Furthermore, after accounting for confounding factors, the LBR was significantly decreased in the ≤4-cell (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48–0.80, P < 0.001) and 5-cell (aOR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57–0.92, P = 0.009) groups as compared to the 8-cell group. Likewise, the blastocysts arising from ≤4-cell (aOR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57–0.93, P = 0.010) or 5-cell (aOR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.97, P = 0.024) embryos were associated with lower clinical pregnancy rate than those from 8-cell embryos. No significant differences were observed in biochemical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION A limitation of the current study was its retrospective design. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our observations suggested that a low Day 3 cell number was related to decreased LBR after blastocyst transfer in young women, which provided vital information for clinicians in selecting blastocyst during IVF treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (31770989 to Y.W.; 81671520 to Q.C.) and the Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital Foundation of China (JYLJ030 to Y.W.). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.


2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 806-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey N Block ◽  
Matthew T Aliota ◽  
Thomas C Friedrich ◽  
Michele L Schotzko ◽  
Katherine D Mean ◽  
...  

Abstract Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in humans, and infection in the first trimester can lead to miscarriage and stillbirth. Vertical and sexual transmissions of ZIKV have been demonstrated, yet the impact of infection during the initial stages of pregnancy remains unexplored. Here we defined the impact of ZIKV on early embryonic and placental development with a rhesus macaque model. During in vitro fertilization (IVF), macaque gametes were inoculated with a physiologically relevant dose of 5.48log10 plaque-forming units (PFU) of Zika virus/H.sapiens-tc/PUR/2015/PRVABC59_v3c2. Exposure at fertilization did not alter blastocyst formation rates compared to controls. To determine the impact of ZIKV exposure at implantation, hatched blastocysts were incubated with 3.26log10, 4.26log10, or 5.26log10 PFU, or not exposed to ZIKV, followed by extended embryo culture for 10 days. ZIKV exposure negatively impacted attachment, growth, and survival in comparison to controls, with exposure to 5.26log10 PFU ZIKV resulting in embryonic degeneration by day 2. Embryonic secretion of pregnancy hormones was lower in ZIKV-exposed embryos. Increasing levels of infectious virus were detected in the culture media post-exposure, suggesting that the trophectoderm is susceptible to productive ZIKV infection. These results demonstrate that ZIKV exposure severely impacts the zona-free blastocyst, whereas exposure at the time of fertilization does not hinder blastocyst formation. Overall, early stages of pregnancy may be profoundly sensitive to infection and pregnancy loss, and the negative impact of ZIKV infection on pregnancy outcomes may be underestimated.


1999 ◽  
Vol 84 (8) ◽  
pp. 2638-2646
Author(s):  
Carlos Simón ◽  
Amparo Mercader ◽  
Juan Garcia-Velasco ◽  
George Nikas ◽  
Carlos Moreno ◽  
...  

We have developed a coculture system with autologous human endometrial epithelial cells (AEEC) that retained many features of human endometrial epithelium. Implantation failure (IF; >3 previous cycles failed with 3–4 good quality embryos transferred) is a distressing condition in which 2-day embryo transfer repetition is the routine option. The objective of this study was to investigate the basics and to evaluate prospectively the clinical value of embryo coculture on AEEC and blastocyst transfer with their own oocytes [in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients] or with donated oocytes (oocyte donation patients) compared to a routine day 2 embryo transfer for patients with IF. Scanning electron microscopy and mouse embryo assays demonstrate that EEC from fertile and IF patients were morphologically and functionally similar; similar findings were observed in EEC obtained from fresh or frozen endometria. Clinically, 168 IVF cycles were performed in 127 patients with 3.8 ± 0.2 previously failed cycles, and 80 cycles were performed in 57 patients undergoing oocyte donation with 3.0 ± 0.2 previously failed cycles. Twenty IVF patients and 15 ovum donation patients with 3 previously failed cycles in whom a 2-day embryo transfer was performed were used as controls. In 88% of ovum donation cycles, at least 2 blastocysts were available for transfer, with 60.1% blastocyst formation; 2.2 ± 0.1 blastocysts were transferred/cycle, and 36 pregnancies (determined by fetal cardiac activity) were obtained (32.7% implantation and 54.5% pregnancy rates). In 168 IVF cycles, 8.1 ± 0.2 embryos/cycle started coculture, resulting in 49.2% blastocyst formation; 2.3 ± 0.2 blastocysts were transferred/cycle, and 29 clinical pregnancies were obtained (11.8% implantation and 20.2% pregnancy rates). Fifteen cycles were canceled (9%). In oocyte donation patients with IF undergoing 2-day embryo transfer, implantation and pregnancy rates were significantly lower (4.5% and 13.3%; P < 0.01) than with coculture; however, in IVF patients with IF, results with day 2 transfer (10.7% and 35%) were similar to those with coculture. The present study demonstrates that coculture of human embryos with AEEC and blastocyst transfer is safe, ethical, and effective and constitutes a new approach to improve implantation in patients with IF undergoing ovum donation, but not in IVF patients.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiling Yang ◽  
li Lin ◽  
Chunli Sha ◽  
Taoqiong Li ◽  
Wujiang Gao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In recent years, there have been emerging many reports on the pregnancy outcomes of fresh blastocyst transfer (BT) and freeze-thaw BT, but these couclusions are controversial and incomplete. To compare the pregnancy outcomes, maternal complications and neonatal outcomes of fresh and frozen-thawed BT in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles, we conducted a meta-analysis. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until January 2020. Data were extracted independently by two authors. Results: 42 studies, including 12 randomized controlled trials (RCT) met the inclusion criteria. Fresh BT showed lower implantation rate (IR), pregnancy rate (PR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) and higher eptopic pregnancy rate (EPR) compared with frozen-thawed BT consistent with the results of RCT. The risks of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), placental abruption (PA) and preterm were higher in fresh BT than in the frozen-thawed BT. The risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and pre-eclampsia was decreased in fresh BT , however, no significant differences of risks for PIH, pre-eclampsia, OHSS, and preterm was found between the two group in the 2 RCT included. Compared with frozen-thawed BT, fresh BT appears to be associated with small for gestational age (SGA) and low birth weight (LBW). No differences in the incidences of neonatal mortality and neonatal malformations were observed between fresh and frozen-thawed BT. Conclusions: In summary, Considering the higher IR, PR, OPR, lower EPR, and the decreased risks of OHSS, PA and preterm, as well as the incidences of SGA and LBW in frozen-thawed BT, this meta-analysis indicates that frozen-thawed BT may be a better choice for mothers and babies compared with fresh BT. Key words: Fresh blastocyst transfer, frozen thawed blastocyst transfer, pregnancy outcome, maternal complications, neonatal outcomes


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Yuta Kasahara ◽  
Tomoko Hashimoto ◽  
Ryo Yokomizo ◽  
Yuya Takeshige ◽  
Koki Yoshinaga ◽  
...  

Background:The clinical value of personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by the endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) tests for recurrent implantation failure (RIF) cases is still unclear. The aim of this study is to clarify the efficacy of ERA leading to personalization of the day of embryo transfer (ET) in RIF patients. Methods: A retrospective study was performed for 94 patients with RIF who underwent ERA between July 2015 and December 2019. Pregnancy outcomes in a previous vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (previous VBT) and a personalized vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (pVBT) in identical patients were compared. The details of each pVBT were further analyzed between patients in a non-displaced group, which indicated “receptive” cases in ERA results and those who were in the displaced group, which indicated “non-receptive” cases. Results:When the pregnancy rate, both per patient and per transfer cycle, of previous VBT and pVBT were compared, a significant increase in pVBT was observed between the two methods (5.3% vs. 62.8%, 4.4% vs. 47.9%, respectively). The pregnancy rates, implantation rates, and clinical pregnancy rates of the first pVBT were significantly higher in the displaced group than the non-displaced group. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate of the displaced group tended to be higher compared to that of the non-displaced group in the first pVBT, although the difference was not statistically significant (51.0% vs. 31.1%, [Formula: see text] = 0.06). Conclusions:Our study demonstrates that pVBT guided by ERA tests may improve pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients whose window of implantation (WOI) is displaced, and its effect may be more pronounced at the first pVBT. The displacement of WOI may be considered to be one of the causes of RIF, and its adjustment may contribute to the improvement of pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiling Yang ◽  
Li Lin ◽  
Chunli Sha ◽  
Taoqiong Li ◽  
Wujiang Gao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In recent years, there have been many reports on the pregnancy outcomes of fresh blastocyst transfer (BT) and frozen-thawed BT, but the conclusions are controversial and incomplete. To compare the pregnancy outcomes, maternal complications and neonatal outcomes of fresh and frozen-thawed BT in the context of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles, we conducted a meta-analysis. Methods A meta-analysis was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through May 2020. Data were extracted independently by two authors. Results Fifty-four studies, including 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), met the inclusion criteria. Fresh BT was associated with a lower implantation rate, pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate and higher ectopic pregnancy rate than frozen-thawed BT according to the results of the RCTs. The risks of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, placental abruption, placenta previa and preterm delivery were higher for fresh BT than for frozen-thawed BT. The risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia was lower for fresh BT; however, no significant differences in risks for gestational diabetes mellitus and preterm rupture of membrane were found between the two groups. Compared with frozen-thawed BT, fresh BT appears to be associated with small for gestational age and low birth weight. No differences in the incidences of neonatal mortality or neonatal malformation were observed between fresh and frozen-thawed BT. Conclusions At present there is an overall slight preponderance of risks in fresh cycles against frozen, however individualization is required and current knowledge does not permit to address a defintive response.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document