Age and Gender Detection System using Raspberry Pi

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 14-18
Author(s):  
Sumangala Biradar ◽  
Beena Torgal ◽  
Namrata Hosamani ◽  
Renuka Bidarakundi ◽  
Shruti Mudhol
Author(s):  
Prof. Jaydeep Patil ◽  
Rohit Thombare ◽  
Yash deo ◽  
Rohit Kharche ◽  
Nikhil Tagad

In recent years, much effort has been put forth to balance age and sexuality. It has been reported that the age can be accurately measured under controlled areas such as front faces, no speech, and stationary lighting conditions. However, it is not intended to achieve the same level of accuracy in the real world environment due to the wide variation in camera use, positioning, and lighting conditions. In this paper, we use a recently proposed mechanism to study equipment called covariate shift adaptation to reduce the change in lighting conditions between the laboratory and the working environment. By examining actual age estimates, we demonstrate the usefulness of our proposed approach.


2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (07) ◽  
pp. 56-61
Author(s):  
Jamoliddin Uraimov ◽  
◽  
Nosirjon Abdurazaqov ◽  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-64
Author(s):  
Pray Somaldo ◽  
Dina Chahyati

The crowd detection system on CCTV has proven to be useful for retail and shopping sector owners in mall areas. The data can be used as a guide by shopping center owners to find out the number of visitors who enter at a certain time. However, such information was still insufficient. The need for richer data has led to the development of more specific person detection which involves gender. Gender detection can provide specific information on the number of men and women visiting a particular location. However, gender detection alone does not provide an identity label for every detection that occurs, so it needs to be combined with a multi-person tracking system. This study compares two tracking methods with gender detection, namely FairMOT with gender classification and MCMOT. The first method produces MOTA, MOTP, IDS, and FPS of 78.56, 79.57, 19, and 24.4, while the second method produces 69.84, 81.94, 147, and 30.5. In addition, evaluation of gender was also carried out where the first method resulted in a gender accuracy of 65\% while the second method was 62.35\%. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 671-676
Author(s):  
Arsala Kadri ◽  
Kirti Sharma ◽  
Narendrasinh Chauhan

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Meinedo ◽  
Isabel Trancoso

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Felix ◽  
Anjali T. Naik-Polan ◽  
Christine Sloss ◽  
Lashaunda Poindexter ◽  
Karen S. Budd

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirby Gilliland ◽  
Robert E. Schlegel ◽  
Thomas E. Nesthus

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document