scholarly journals Appraisal of self-care agency A.S.A.-scale : reliability and validity testing of the Dutch version of the A.S.A.-scale measuring Orem's concept 'Self-Care Agency'

1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.C.M. Evers
1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.C.M. Evers ◽  
M.A. Isenberg ◽  
H. Philipsen ◽  
M. Senten ◽  
G. Brouns

Author(s):  
Ayfer PEKER ◽  
Selda MERT ◽  
Yeliz DEMİRHAN ◽  
İnsaf ALTUN ◽  
Canan BAYDEMİR ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 1459-1476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina Guo ◽  
Jaclene A. Zauszniewski ◽  
Xianfei Ding ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Han Gao ◽  
...  

The study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale–Revised (ASAS-R-CHI). A cross-sectional design was used to conduct this study, and the sample consisted of 1,219 older people, collected by a demographic questionnaire, ASAS-R-CHI and the Exercise of Self-Care Agency (ESCA) scale. The Cronbach’s alpha (α) of ASAS-R-CHI was .79, the test–retest correlation was 0.95, and the item-to-total correlations ranged from r = .41 to r = .74. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) resulted in three factors that explained 65.31% of the total variance; all 15 items had strong factor loadings ranging from 0.54 to 0.91. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated the three-factor solution of ASAS-R-CHI had a good fit (x2,chi-square/degree of freedom [CMIN/DF] = 2.61, goodness of fitness index [GFI] = 0.93, adjusted goodness of fit index [AGFI] = 0.92,, comparative fit index [CFI = 0.92], Tucker Lewis index [TLI] = 0.91, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.04, root mean residual [RMR] = 0.02, P-value for test of close fit [PCLOSE] = 0.68). ASAS-R-CHI is a short, reliable, and valid instrument for measuring self-care agency among Chinese older adults.


2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 326-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiko Miyawaki ◽  
Yasuko Shimizu ◽  
Kyoko Uchiumi ◽  
Kawai Asou ◽  
Naoko Murakado ◽  
...  

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a shortened version of the Instrument of Diabetes Self-Care Agency (IDSCA). Methods: In the development of the shortened version of IDSCA, intraclass correlation coefficient 2 (ICC2) analysis was done to determine items to be deleted. However, the 7 subscales were retained. The shortened IDSCA was evaluated for internal consistency, reproducibility, concurrent validity, criterion-related validity, and goodness of fit. Results: The shortened IDSCA included 35 items addressing 7 subscales. High ICC2 (.804) and a high Cronbach’s alpha (.89) indicate internal consistency and reproducibility. A high correlation (.62) between the shortened version of the IDSCA and the Self-Care Agency Questionnaire indicated concurrent validity. Conclusion: The shortened IDSCA provides a reliable and valid measure of self-care agency of individuals with diabetes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1248-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna D LaNoue ◽  
Angela M Gerolamo ◽  
Rhea Powell ◽  
Garrison Nord ◽  
Amanda MB Doty ◽  
...  

Research suggests that patient uncertainty related to experiencing symptoms may drive decisions to seek care. The only validated measure of patient uncertainty assesses uncertainty related to defined illness. In prior work, we engaged patients to describe uncertainty related to symptoms and used findings to develop the ‘U-Scale’ scale. In this work, we present results from preliminary scale reliability and validity testing. Psychometric testing demonstrated content validity, high internal consistency, and evidence for concurrent validity. Next steps include administration in diverse populations for continued refinement and validation, and exploration of the potential contribution of uncertainty to healthcare utilization.


1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theo van Achterberg ◽  
Margarethe Lorensen ◽  
Marjorie A. Isenberg ◽  
George C. M. Evers ◽  
Erna Levin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-36
Author(s):  
Yeşim Aksoy Derya ◽  
Aslı Sis Çelik ◽  
Serap Ejder Apay

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen T. Hallam ◽  
Danielle Leigh ◽  
Cassandra Davis ◽  
Nathan Castle ◽  
Jenny Sharples ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Qin Wang ◽  
Xuancan Zhang ◽  
Li Jiang ◽  
Lezhi Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study aimed at investigating: 1) the relationship between self-care agency and depression and anxiety; 2) the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with depression and anxiety in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) in China. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted. One-hundred and five patients with DR were recruited. Self-care agency was assessed by the exercise of self-care agency (ESCA) scale. Depression and anxiety were assessed by the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS-D and HADS-A). Pearson or Spearman correlations were performed to assess the association between self-care agency and depression and anxiety. Stepwise multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the contribution of the sociodemographic and clinical factors to depression and anxiety. Results Thirty-six (34.3%) and 43 (41.1%) patients exhibited depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively. Only 24 (22.9%) patients showed a high self-care agency. The ESCA total and subscale scores were negatively correlated depressive symptoms (P < 0.05). Self-care skills were negatively correlated with anxiety symptoms (P < 0.05). ESCA total score, rural residence, history of hypertension and visual acuity were associated with depression; self-care skills and diastolic blood pressure were associated with anxiety. Conclusions Self-care agency negatively correlates with depression and anxiety in patients with DR. Special attention should be paid to patients living in rural areas and/or those having a history of hypertension when assessing depression and anxiety in patients with DR. Future studies are needed to clarify the causal relationship between self-care agency and depression and anxiety.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document