Developing and Pilot Testing a Population-focused Nutrition Screen Incorporating Social Determinants of Health

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-89
Author(s):  
Kyle L Thompson ◽  
Melissa Gutschall ◽  
Amanda Bliss ◽  
Grace Herman ◽  
Madison Zimmerman ◽  
...  

Introduction: Given that nutrition status is directly related to a variety of health outcomes, nutrition screening is a prime focus of public health nutrition practice.  Objectives: The purposes of this pilot study were to develop and pilot test a Rural Adult Nutrition Screen (RANS) that includes criteria addressing social determinants of health and to explore possible applications of the screen development methodology in other settings. Methods: Mixed-methods research including interviews and survey dissemination was conducted among a rural southern Appalachian population in the United States.  Themes identified in the research were used to construct a preliminary rural adult nutrition screen (RANS-1).  The RANS-1 was pilot-tested among a sample of community-dwelling rural residents (n = 83), and was revised based on participant, administrator, and nutrition practitioner comments.  The revised screen, the RANS, was pilot-tested among a sample of attendees of a free community medical clinic (n = 37).   Nutrition risk as determined by the RANS was compared with the Nutrition Triage Score of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), the United States Department of Agriculture 6-item Household Food Security Survey Module (USDA-6), and nutrition assessment performed by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist who was also credentialed as a Physician Assistant (RDN, PA).  Non-parametric statistical tests were used to compare the results of the PG-SGA NTS and the USDA-6 with the RANS regarding “at risk” and “low risk” status. Results: In this small pilot study, no statistically significant differences were found among either comparative instrument and the RANS in determination of “at risk” and “low risk” status.  The RDN, PA’s agreement with the RANS was 100%.  Conclusion:  This pilot study provides some evidence that the RANS may be used to screen rural, community-dwelling adults for nutrition needs in light of social determinants of health common in rural settings.  Further research and formal validation of the RANS are needed in order to establish this tool as a valid nutrition screen for use in the rural community setting.  Procedures used to develop the RANS may be applicable to the development of population-specific nutrition screens in other rural and urban global populations.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 961-961
Author(s):  
Sojeong Lee ◽  
Victoria Rizzo

Abstract The visible impact of the SDoHs on health and behavioral health as well as health disparities among minority populations is heightened due to COVID-19. One group about which little is known in relation to SDoHs is the older Korean immigrant population in the U.S. To examine the impact of SDoHs on the health, mental health, and health care utilization, a systematic review of studies focused on SDoHs for this population was conducted. Using multiple indexing terms, databases were searched for articles published in English between January 1, 2011 and December 2020. Articles were included in the search if they examined social determinants of health of older Korean immigrants defined as foreign-born Koreans aged 60 or older who live in the United States regardless of citizenship or legal immigration status. A total of 1090 articles were identified in the search. A review of abstracts for inclusion criteria resulted in 118 articles for review. Seventy-one articles were excluded during the review process. A total of 47 articles met inclusion criteria and were evaluated. The review revealed that SDoHs, including education level, financial resources, access to health insurance, level of acculturation and level of social support, influenced cognitive status, depressive symptoms, health status and quality of life. These findings validate the need for interventions to address the social care needs of older Korean immigrants and can be used to identify the role of social workers in addressing the SDoHs that result in health disparities for older Korean immigrants.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 164-164
Author(s):  
Yongjing Ping ◽  
Chenkai Wu ◽  
Michelle Odden ◽  
Robert Stawski ◽  
Hoda Magid

Abstract The interrelatedness between social determinants of health impedes researchers to identify important social factors for health investment. Since the older population had highly diverse social backgrounds, a new approach is needed to quantify the aggregate effect of social factors and develop person-centered social interventions. Participants ([n = 7383], 54.5% female) were aged 65 years or above who complete an additional psychosocial questionnaire in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) at study entry in 2006 or 2008. Social determinants of health encompassing five social domains: economic stability, neighborhood and physical environment, education, community and social context, and health care system. Five-year mortality was calculated as the number of years from the interview date to the death date. We used the forward stepwise logistic regression to construct the polysocial score and multivariate logistic regressions to assess the associations between polysocial score and five-year mortality. Polysocial score (range: 7 to 59, mean±SD: 35.5±7.5) was created using 15 social determinants of health. Of the 7383 participants, 491 (30.8%), 599 (17.2%), and 166 (7.8%) deaths occurred over five years among participants with a low (0-29), intermediate (30-39), and high (40+) polysocial score, respectively. Participants with an intermediate (Odds Ratio [OR]=0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.89) or high (OR=0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.59) polysocial score had higher odds of death than those in the low category in the fully adjusted model, respectively. The polysocial approach may offer possible solutions to monitor social environments and suggestions for older adults to improve their social status for specific health outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 422-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marik Moen ◽  
Carla Storr ◽  
Danielle German ◽  
Erika Friedmann ◽  
Meg Johantgen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document