Comparison of procalcitonin and c-reactive protein with blood culture in early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Swati Karad ◽  
◽  
Desma D'Souza ◽  
Sujata Baveja ◽  
◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-65
Author(s):  
Chiranjib Barua ◽  
Md Nurul Anwar ◽  
Md Shahidullah ◽  
Shahadat Hossain ◽  
Sharmila Barua ◽  
...  

Neonatal septicemia is a clinical syndrome of systemic illness accompanied by bacteremia occuring in the first 28 days of life. Neonatal septicemia is one of the major causes of neonatal death in developing countries. Early diagnosis and treatment can prevent neonatal mortality and morbidity. The present study includes: 1) usefulness of CRP (C-reactive protein), Total Leucocyte Count, Platelet Count and Blood Culture in early diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis, 2) significance of serial CRP in diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. 3) the prognostic value of CRP in neonatal sepsis. This is a prospective study done in neonatal ward, Chittagong Medical College Hospital and carried out from January 2008 to January 2011. Sample size was 300. One hundred fifty neonates with suspected sepsis as cases and 150 healthy babies as control were enrolled in this study. Seventy two percent of cases neonates were preterm and low birth weight. Common risk factors for neonatal septicemia which were identified in this study; preterm (72%), low birth weight (72%), premature rupture membrane (60%), chorioamnionitis (26%) and maternal urinary tract infection (16%) . Out of 150 cases of suspected neonatal sepsis total 80.7%% had raised CRP, in initial sample 70.39% were CRP positive and in 2nd sample additional 9.31% case were CRP positive . In control group 91% were CRP negative. CRP was positive in 100% of culture proven sepsis. Sensitivity of CRP was 80.67% and specificity of CRP was 76.44%. Leucocytosis was observed in 7% of cases and leucopenia was found in 11% of cases. In 82 % cases leucocyte count was found normal. In control group, 95% had normal leucocyte count and 5% had leucocytosis but no leucopenia. Sensitivity of leucocyte count was 18% and specificity was 20.68%. Thrombocytopenia was found in 28% of case group. Out of 150 cases only 15.33% yielded growth of organisms in blood culture. Klebsiella was the most common pathogen isolated which was followed by E.coli and Strph. aureus. Sensitivity of blood culture was 15.33% and specificity was 100% Therefore serial CRP can be taken as alternative method for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis specially in developing countries where blood culture is not readily available.J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2014; 32: 61-65


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 1036-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alistair G. S. Philip ◽  
Jean R. Hewitt

To better define the need for antibiotic therapy, several tests recommended as helpful in diagnosing neonatal sepsis were evaluated in 376 neonates during the first week after birth. The five most useful tests (with definitions of abnormality) were: band/total neutrophils ([unknown]0.2); leukocyte count (<5,000/cu mm); latex-C-reactive protein (positive >0.8 mg/100 ml); ESR ([unknown]15 mm for the first hour); and latex haptoglobin (positive >25 mg/100 ml). When these five tests were applied early (at the time infection was suspected and blood culture sent), 28 of 30 cases (93%) subsequently proven to have infection had two or more abnormal tests. This compares with only 24 of 320 babies (8%) with no subsequently documented evidence of infection. Of all babies who had two or more tests positive (n = 71), 39% had proven sepsis, and an additional 23% had "very probable" infection. The combination of leukopenia and an elevated band/total neutrophil ratio seems to be particularly predictive of sepsis (13 of 17 babies with this combination had proven sepsis). When less than two tests were positive, the probability that sepsis was not present was 99%. These simple, rapid tests require no special laboratory facilities and provide a valuable adjunct in the early detection of the neonate with sepsis.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-153
Author(s):  
Patrick R. Murray

The article by Philip and Hewitt (Pediatrics 65:1036-1041, 1980) on the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis was interesting, but their conclusions may be misleading. They demonstrated that when at least two of five screening tests were positive (band/total neutrophils, leukocyte counts, latex C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and latex haptoglobin), neonatal sepsis could be accurately predicted in 28 of 30 (93%) infants. Two or more tests were also positive for 43 of 346 (12%) infants without proven sepsis.


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Author(s):  
BK Jha ◽  
YI Singh ◽  
S Mahadevmurthy ◽  
NK Chaudhary

Early diagnosis of childhood septicemia can be done by simple tests like C-reactive protein (CRP) and anticoagulant added blood centrifuged buffy coat smear (BBCS) examination, where there is no well equipped hospital setting for blood culture and identification facility in remote health care centers. This study was conducted between 1st Jan. 2007 to 27th Dec. 2007 in College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur, Nepal. In this study we have selected 150 suspected cases of childhood septicemia for screening CRP by kit method and BBCS by two slide techniques. This kit is supplied by Span Diagnostic Pvt. Ltd. (Surat, India). Out of 150 cases of childhood septicemia of age group 0-14 years, 83 had positive C- reactive protein (CRP >6ì g/ml), 70 were positive for BBCS and blood culture was positive only in 83 cases, where predominant organism being Klebsiella species followed by Staphylococcus species. CRP test showed 100.0% sensitivity and 87.30% specificity, where BBCS showed 76.5% sensitivity and 91.2% specificity. Blood culture reports are available only after 48-72 hours and this facility is available only in well equipped centers but CRP and BBCS are easy and cheap procedure to perform even in remote areas for early diagnosis of childhood septicemia. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jcmsn.v7i1.5968 JCMSN 2011; 7(1): 19-23


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (13) ◽  
pp. 751-754
Author(s):  
Pruthvi D ◽  
Pavan Ramarao Kulkarni ◽  
Uma Raghavendra Jamkhandi ◽  
Shivakumar Sanganagouda Inamdar

BACKGROUND Neonatal septicaemia is a bacterial infection with positive blood culture in first four weeks of life. The early sepsis screen is vital as it detects earlier and benefits the clinician to treat the infection reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity. We wanted to evaluate various haematological screening parameters and C-reactive protein (CRP) in blood culture positive neonates in sepsis. METHODS This prospective study was conducted for a period of one year. Blood samples from hundred clinically suspected neonatal septicaemia cases were subjected to aerobic culture and sepsis screen tests like C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation ratio (ESR), total WBC count, absolute neutrophil count, immature / total neutrophil count (I / T) ratio and platelet count. The culture results were correlated with the sepsis screen tests. RESULTS Of the hundred cases studied, 18 % were blood culture positive and 66 % were males. Early onset septicaemia was more common, seen in 64 % of cases than late onset septicaemia (26 %) cases. Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest organism isolated in 38.46 % of cases followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae & E. Coli. Among the haematological parameters, the positivity was best with Creactive protein (94.44 %) followed by immature & mature neutrophil ratio (I / M) (94.44 %), I / T ratio (88.88 %) and the least with absolute neutrophil count (66.0 %). Any two or more parameters were positive in 94.44 % of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS Sepsis screen has good sensitivity, specificity and is a valuable aid for early diagnosis of neonatal septicaemia. Sepsis screen is simple, cost effective, less time consuming and easy to perform. As an individual test C-reactive protein has shown highest sensitivity, specificity and is a sensitive and responsive indicator of neonatal sepsis. KEYWORDS Blood Culture, Neonatal Septicaemia, Sepsis Screen


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-106
Author(s):  
Seema Shah ◽  
Anil Kumar Goel ◽  
Renu Garg ◽  
Mamta Padhy ◽  
Amit Gupta

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-217
Author(s):  
Abebe Sorsa

Introduction:Nowadays various biochemical markers, such as C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Procalcitonin and tumor necrosis factor alpha, have been proposed as a potential marker for screening neonatal sepsis. In the current study, we tried to see the diagnostic significance of White Blood Cell (WBC) count and CRP in diagnostic screening of neonatal sepsis.Methods:A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2016 to April 2017 in Asella Teaching and Referral Hospital. Data were entered into EPI-INFO version 3.5.1 for cleanup and then exported to SPSS version 17 for further analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were used to assess the accuracy of CRP and WBC count taking blood culture as gold standard.Results:Data of 303 neonates with clinical sepsis were analyzed. Positive CRP and abnormal WBC were reported in 136(45%) and 99(32.7%) of study subjects respectively. Blood culture turned to be positive in 88(29.4%) of study subjects. The Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV and NPV of WBC count were 59.5 %, 79.6%, 52%, 64.5% respectively while the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of CRP were 65.6%, 78%, 42% and 91% respectively. By combining both WBC and CRP, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV improve to 78.5%, 83%, 60% and 93% respectively. CRP positivity rate was comparable across gram positive and gram negative bacteria while high WBC count were more reported among gram positive sepsis than gram negative ( OR 4.8, (95% CI 1.45-15.87, P 0.01)Conclusion:Based on this study’s finding, it can be concluded that CRP alone or in combination with WBC count showed better diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 364
Author(s):  
Prutha Pankajkumar Desai ◽  
Amrish N. Shah ◽  
Tejas Pandya ◽  
Pankaj Desai ◽  
Tejal Pandya

2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Hawk

SEPSIS IS ONE OF THE MOST COMMON diagnostic challenges in the NICU. Currently a definitive diagnosis can be made only with the gold-standard blood culture, which is generally not available for 48 hours.1,2 Difficulty obtaining a large enough sample to detect a positive blood culture, as well as increased use of antenatal antibiotics, has complicated the ability to make a definitive diagnosis of sepsis.3 If left untreated, sepsis can increase morbidity and mortality. Therefore, many infants are treated empirically with broad-spectrum antibiotics.4,5 Two kinds of tests would be most helpful in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: one that quickly confirms the diagnosis and one that conclusively rules it out. In fact, a diagnostic sepsis marker with a high negative predictive value (the value representing patients without sepsis who are correctly diagnosed) might reduce the short- and long-term adverse effects of antibiotics, health care costs, and length of hospital stay.6 Despite extensive investigation no single test meets the criteria that would make it an ideal marker for the early diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn.5,7,8 Generally, screening includes a complete blood count with differential and may be accompanied by other adjunctive tests such as a C-reactive protein (CRP).9–11 This column examines CRP, an acute phase reactant (APR), as a diagnostic marker for neonatal sepsis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document