scholarly journals Sex Allocation, Diet, and Small Population Management of African Rhinoceros

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Elizabeth Victoria Berkeley

<p>The application of sex allocation theory can provide useful insight into endangered rhinoceros biology to improve in situ and ex situ conservation efforts by understanding the factors that cause a female to produce one sex of calf. By decreasing the birth sex ratio (number of males born per number of females born) in a population it may be possible to increase population growth rates. The first aim was to determine if an environmentally cued sex allocation response occurred in black rhinos. By examining rainfall and calf sex records in a wild black rhino population, I identified that birth sex ratios increase in rainy seasons and rainy years. Mothers were more likely to be observed with male calves if they conceived during the wet season (57.3% male) than during the dry season (42.9% male). Mothers were more likely to raise male calves if they conceived during wet years (60.2% male) than during dry years (46.1% male). Next, I examined whether pulsatile or random variation in sex ratios of different magnitudes, as might occur under changes in climate patterns, would be detrimental to rhinoceros population growth. Results demonstrated that while random increases in the magnitude of birth sex ratio variation, in either direction, increased population survival probability up to 0.907, sequential pulsed years of birth sex ratio bias had the opposite effect on population performance down to a survival probability of 0.619. Furthermore, for both scenarios, populations of less than 50 animals are particularly vulnerable to extinction. Since the sex biases observed in the captive rhinoceros population were attributed to several factors, I used an information theoretic approach to evaluate the relative importance of different hypotheses for birth sex bias for predicting calf sex. The results demonstrated that none of the models tested were greatly predictive of calf sex. Suspecting that the mechanisms that were cueing calf sex occur close to the time of conception and were nutritionally cued, in the final experiment, I measured changes in blood glucose in white rhinos after they ate different meals. At 90 minutes, serum glucose levels in rhinos eating the 10 % lucerne hay diet were significantly lower than the 5% glucose and 10% glucose diets but not the 10% pellet nor 10% grass hay diets. This is the first time such an experiment has been published in a wildlife species and not only demonstrates the feasibility of training rhinos for successive blood draws but also that captive diets are low glycemic for white rhinos. Overall, my research confirmed that an environmentally cued sex allocation response does occur in African rhinos, and changes in the duration and magnitude of sex ratio patterns can decrease population growth and increase potential for extinction. Additionally, none of the previous hypotheses for the suspected male-sex bias in captive born rhinos were influential on calf sex, which shifts the focus of sex allocation research in rhinos to more acute signals around the time of conception, such as changes in diet and body condition.</p>

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Elizabeth Victoria Berkeley

<p>The application of sex allocation theory can provide useful insight into endangered rhinoceros biology to improve in situ and ex situ conservation efforts by understanding the factors that cause a female to produce one sex of calf. By decreasing the birth sex ratio (number of males born per number of females born) in a population it may be possible to increase population growth rates. The first aim was to determine if an environmentally cued sex allocation response occurred in black rhinos. By examining rainfall and calf sex records in a wild black rhino population, I identified that birth sex ratios increase in rainy seasons and rainy years. Mothers were more likely to be observed with male calves if they conceived during the wet season (57.3% male) than during the dry season (42.9% male). Mothers were more likely to raise male calves if they conceived during wet years (60.2% male) than during dry years (46.1% male). Next, I examined whether pulsatile or random variation in sex ratios of different magnitudes, as might occur under changes in climate patterns, would be detrimental to rhinoceros population growth. Results demonstrated that while random increases in the magnitude of birth sex ratio variation, in either direction, increased population survival probability up to 0.907, sequential pulsed years of birth sex ratio bias had the opposite effect on population performance down to a survival probability of 0.619. Furthermore, for both scenarios, populations of less than 50 animals are particularly vulnerable to extinction. Since the sex biases observed in the captive rhinoceros population were attributed to several factors, I used an information theoretic approach to evaluate the relative importance of different hypotheses for birth sex bias for predicting calf sex. The results demonstrated that none of the models tested were greatly predictive of calf sex. Suspecting that the mechanisms that were cueing calf sex occur close to the time of conception and were nutritionally cued, in the final experiment, I measured changes in blood glucose in white rhinos after they ate different meals. At 90 minutes, serum glucose levels in rhinos eating the 10 % lucerne hay diet were significantly lower than the 5% glucose and 10% glucose diets but not the 10% pellet nor 10% grass hay diets. This is the first time such an experiment has been published in a wildlife species and not only demonstrates the feasibility of training rhinos for successive blood draws but also that captive diets are low glycemic for white rhinos. Overall, my research confirmed that an environmentally cued sex allocation response does occur in African rhinos, and changes in the duration and magnitude of sex ratio patterns can decrease population growth and increase potential for extinction. Additionally, none of the previous hypotheses for the suspected male-sex bias in captive born rhinos were influential on calf sex, which shifts the focus of sex allocation research in rhinos to more acute signals around the time of conception, such as changes in diet and body condition.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 20190929
Author(s):  
Renée C. Firman ◽  
Jamie N. Tedeschi ◽  
Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez

Mammal sex allocation research has focused almost exclusively on maternal traits, but it is now apparent that fathers can also influence offspring sex ratios. Parents that produce female offspring under conditions of intense male–male competition can benefit with greater assurance of maximized grand-parentage. Adaptive adjustment in the sperm sex ratio, for example with an increase in the production of X-chromosome bearing sperm (CBS), is one potential paternal mechanism for achieving female-biased sex ratios. Here, we tested this mechanistic hypothesis by varying the risk of male–male competition that male house mice perceived during development, and quantifying sperm sex ratios at sexual maturity. Our analyses revealed that males exposed to a competitive ‘risk’ produced lower proportions of Y-CBS compared to males that matured under ‘no risk’ of competition. We also explored whether testosterone production was linked to sperm sex ratio variation, but found no evidence to support this. We discuss our findings in relation to the adaptive value of sperm sex ratio adjustments and the role of steroid hormones in socially induced sex allocation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1729) ◽  
pp. 20160322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Komdeur ◽  
Tamás Székely ◽  
Xiaoyan Long ◽  
Sjouke A. Kingma

Cooperative breeding is a form of breeding system where in addition to a core breeding pair, one or more usually non-breeding individuals provide offspring care. Cooperative breeding is widespread in birds, but its origin and maintenance in contemporary populations are debated. Although deviations in adult sex ratio (ASR, the proportion of males in the adult population) have been hypothesized to influence the occurrence of cooperative breeding because of the resulting surplus of one sex and limited availability of breeding partners, this hypothesis has not been tested across a wide range of taxa. By using data from 188 bird species and phylogenetically controlled analyses, we show that cooperatively breeding species have more male-biased ASRs than non-cooperative species. Importantly, ASR predicts helper sex ratio: in species with more male-biased ASR, helper sex ratio is also more male biased. We also show that offspring sex ratios do not predict ASRs, so that the skewed ASRs emerge during the period when individuals aim to obtain a breeding position or later during adulthood. In line with this result, we found that ASR (among both cooperatively and non-cooperatively breeding species) is inversely related to sex bias in dispersal distance, suggesting that the cost of dispersal is more severe for the further-dispersing sex. As females usually disperse further in birds, this explains the generally male-biased ASR, and in combination with benefits of philopatry for males, this probably explains why ASR is more biased in cooperatively breeding species. Taken together, our results suggest that a sex bias in helping in cooperatively breeding species relates to biased ASRs. We propose that this relationship is driven by sex-specific costs and benefits of dispersal and helping, as well as other demographic factors. Future phylogenetic comparative and experimental work is needed to establish how this relationship emerges. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Adult sex ratios and reproductive decisions: a critical re-examination of sex differences in human and animal societies’.


1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.M. Heinz

AbstractAn often encountered problem associated with augmentative and inundative biological control programmes is the high cost of producing sufficient numbers of natural enemies necessary to suppress pest populations within the time constraints imposed by ephemeral agroecosystems. In many arrhenotokous parasitoids, overproduction of males in mass-rearing cultures inflates costs (per female) and thus limits the economic feasibility of these biological control programmes. Within the context of existing production technologies, experiments were conducted to determine if the sex ratio ofCatolaccus grandis(Burks), an ectoparasitoid of the boll weevilAnthonomous grandisBoheman, varied as a function of boll weevil larval size. Results from natural and manipulative experiments demonstrate the following behavioural characteristics associated with C.grandissex allocation behaviour: (i) femaleC. grandisoffspring are produced on large size hosts and male offspring are produced on small hosts; (ii) whether a host is considered large or small depends upon the overall distribution of host sizes encountered by a female parasitoid; and (iii) female parasitoids exhibit a greater rate of increase in body size with host size than do male parasitoids. The observed patterns cannot be explained by sex-specific mortality of immature parasitoids developing on the different host size categories. In subsequent experiments, laboratory cultures ofC. grandisexposed daily to successively larger sizes ofA. grandislarvae produced successively greater female biased offspring sex ratios, cultures exposed daily to successively smaller sizes of host larvae produced successively greater male biased offspring sex ratios, and cultures exposed daily to equivalent host size distributions over time maintained a uniform offspring sex ratio. By increasing the average size ofA. grandislarval hosts exposed toC. grandisby 2.5 mg per day in mass rearing cultures, the percentage of male progeny can be reduced from 33% to 23% over a period of four consecutive exposure days.


Behaviour ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 114 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 137-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.C.J. Godfray ◽  
I.C.W. Hardy

Abstract1) Sex ratio theory has assumed that females can produce offspring of both sexes. It has been suggested that some females in haplodiploid populations are only able to produce sons (constrained sex allocation), for example because they are virgin. The presence of such females influences the optimal sex ratio of unconstrained females. The relevance of these ideas to field sex ratios is largely untested. 2) The frequencies of constrained oviposition in three Drosophila parasitoid species are estimated. Constrained, ovipositing females were distinguished by the absence of sperm in the spermatheca. Constrained females were absent or rare in these species. 3) We review data from the literature that allow an estimate of the frequency of constrained females. 4) We conclude that the available evidence suggests that while constrained oviposition is uncommon, there are some species in which constrained females are sufficiently common to select for an observable sex ratio bias by unconstrained females.


1993 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 937-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry N. Milligan ◽  
R. Mark Brigham

Sex allocation theory predicts that monomorphic species should produce natal sex ratios near unity. We measured natal sex ratios in a maternity colony of approximately 1600 yuma bats (Myotis yumanensis) near Squilax, British Columbia, during June and July 1991. Overall, the natal sex ratio did not differ from unity but the sex ratio did vary significantly throughout the summer. Variation appears to be related to an interaction between maternal age and date of birth. This evidence suggests that facultative manipulation of the sex of the offspring by individual females may occur within the population.


The Condor ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 437-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. South ◽  
Timothy F. Wright

AbstractMany birds, including some parrots, may adjust the sex ratio of their offspring in relation to the relative fitness benefits of sons and daughters. We investigated nestling sex ratios in Yellow-naped Amazons (Amazona auropalliata) using a molecular sexing technique that amplifies intronic regions of the CHD-W and CHD-Z genes in birds. We examined all nestlings in 37 complete clutches comprising 77 chicks. The overall nestling sex ratio did not differ from unity. Sex allocation was not associated with hatch date, sequence of hatching, or clutch size. We also found no difference in sex ratio between two regional dialects. Female Yellow-naped Amazons may be unable to control their hatchling sex ratio. Alternatively, there may be no fitness benefits to females producing more of one sex in relation to the factors we measured here.No Existe Evidencia que Indique Modificaciones Adaptativas de la Proporción de Sexos en la Progenie de Amazona auropalliataResumen. En muchas aves, incluyendo los loros, la proporción de sexos en la progenie puede ajustarse en relación a los beneficios relativos de adecuación biológica de hembras y machos. Dichas tasas fueron investigadas en Amazona auropalliata por medio de una técnica molecular de determinación sexual por la cual se amplifican regiones intrónicas de los genes CHD-W y CHD-Z de aves. Se examinaron todos los pichones de 37 nidadas completas, constituidas por 77 pichones. La proporción de sexos total no resultó diferente a uno. La asignación sexual no estuvo correlacionada con la fecha de eclosión, la secuencia de eclosión, ni el tamaño de la nidada. Tampoco se encontraron diferencias en las proporciones de sexos entre dos dialectos vocales regionales. Las hembras de A. auropalliata podrían no tener la habilidad de controlar la proporción de sexos de su progenie. Alternativamente, es posible que en términos de adecuación biológica, no haya diferencia en el beneficio de producir una progenie enriquecida en un sexo determinado con respecto a los factores medidos en este estudio.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Abe ◽  
Ryosuke Iritani ◽  
Koji Tsuchida ◽  
Yoshitaka Kamimura ◽  
Stuart A. West

AbstractThe scandalous sex ratio behaviour of Melittobia wasps has long posed one of the greatest problems for the field of sex allocation. In contrast to the predictions of theory, and the behaviour of numerous other organisms, laboratory experiments have found that Melittobia females do not produce less female-biased offspring sex ratios when more females lay eggs on a patch. We resolve this scandal, by showing that, in nature, females of M. australica have sophisticated sex ratio behaviour, where their strategy also depends upon whether they have dispersed from the patch where they emerged. When females have not dispersed, they will be laying eggs with close relatives, which keeps local mate competition high, even with multiple females, and so they are selected to produce consistently female-biased sex ratios. Laboratory experiments mimic these conditions. In contrast, when females disperse, they will be interacting with non-relatives, and so they adjust their sex ratio depending upon the number of females laying eggs. Consequently, females appear to use dispersal status as an indirect cue of relatedness, and whether they should adjust their sex ratio in response to the number of females laying eggs on the patch.


1974 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.F. Owen

AbstractThe butterfly, Acraea quirina, occurs as an adult in all months of the year in forests around Freetown in Sierra Leone. For ninc months (July— March) it is not common but in April—June, at the onset of the wet season, becomes exceedingly abundant. During this period there are two generations, the first containing mainly females, while in the second there is what is probably a normal sex ratio. In butterflies the sex ratio is usually 1 : 1 but a number of instances of an excess of females are now known. The possible mechanisms and significance of distorted sex ratios in butterflies are discussed, not only for A. quirina, but for other species, including Hypolimnas bolina.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (20) ◽  
pp. e2024656118
Author(s):  
Jun Abe ◽  
Ryosuke Iritani ◽  
Koji Tsuchida ◽  
Yoshitaka Kamimura ◽  
Stuart A. West

The puzzling sex ratio behavior of Melittobia wasps has long posed one of the greatest questions in the field of sex allocation. Laboratory experiments have found that, in contrast to the predictions of theory and the behavior of numerous other organisms, Melittobia females do not produce fewer female-biased offspring sex ratios when more females lay eggs on a patch. We solve this puzzle by showing that, in nature, females of Melittobia australica have a sophisticated sex ratio behavior, in which their strategy also depends on whether they have dispersed from the patch where they emerged. When females have not dispersed, they lay eggs with close relatives, which keeps local mate competition high even with multiple females, and therefore, they are selected to produce consistently female-biased sex ratios. Laboratory experiments mimic these conditions. In contrast, when females disperse, they interact with nonrelatives, and thus adjust their sex ratio depending on the number of females laying eggs. Consequently, females appear to use dispersal status as an indirect cue of relatedness and whether they should adjust their sex ratio in response to the number of females laying eggs on the patch.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document