scholarly journals A Jack Russell Terrier suspected of sebaceous adenitis with suspected dermatophytosis but poor response to antifungal treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-143
Author(s):  
Takeshi Yamamoto ◽  
Takahito Nishizawa ◽  
Toshiroh Iwasaki
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Fiszman ◽  
Mauro V. Mendlowicz ◽  
Carla Marques-Portella ◽  
Eliane Volchan ◽  
Evandro S. F. Coutinho ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 48 (02) ◽  
pp. 156-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
E J P Brommer ◽  
M M Barrett-Bergshoeff ◽  
R A Allen ◽  
I Schicht ◽  
R M Bertina ◽  
...  

SummaryIntravenous infusion of desmopressin (DDAVP, 0.4 μg/kg b.w. in 12’) causes an increase in the level of extrinsic plasminogen activator, measured in plasma euglobulin fractions with added C1-inactivator on fibrin plates. A poor response or no response at all was elicited in two out of 21 patients with spontaneous thrombosis, 18/38 with hyperlipoproteinaemia and 10/14 with terminal renal insufficiency requiring haemodialysis.Haemodilution during the first 30’ after starting the DDAVP-infusion occurred both in responders and in non-responders; so did haemodynamic reactions: increase in heart rate, drop in diastolic blood pressure, facial flushing. The rise of fibrinolytic activity was shown not to be associated with decreased hepatic blood flow. Normal factor VIII-rises in “non-responders” indicate the responsiveness of the receptive organs, including the hypothalamus, to DDAVP.Despite a normal baseline level of fibrinolytic activity in the blood, as occurs for instance in terminal renal insufficiency, the vascular endothelium may be refractory to stimulation. In some patients, especially in type IV hyperlipoproteinaemia, a selective defect of the release of plasminogen activator is postulated. In subjects with low fibrinolytic activity at rest, as observed in spontaneous thromboembolism and in hypertriglyceridaemia, the failure to release plasminogen activator upon stimulation with DDAVP might be a consequence of an impairment of synthesis as well.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-187
Author(s):  
George P. Christophi ◽  
Yeshika Sharma ◽  
Quader Farhan ◽  
Umang Jain ◽  
Ted Walker ◽  
...  

Background: Non-Langerhans histiocytosis is a group of inflammatory lymphoproliferative disorders originating from non-clonal expansion of hematopoietic stem cells into cytokine-secreting dendritic cells or macrophages. Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) is a rare type of non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis characterized by tissue inflammation and injury caused by macrophage infiltration and histologic findings of foamy histiocytes. Often ECD involves the skeleton, retroperitoneum and the orbits. This is the first report documenting ECD manifesting as segmental colitis and causing cytokine-release syndrome.Case presentation: A 68-year old woman presented with persistent fever without infectious etiology and hematochezia. Endoscopy showed segmental colitis and pathology revealed infiltration of large foamy histiocytes CD3-/CD20-/CD68+/CD163+/S100- consistent with ECD. The patient was empirically treated with steroids but continued to have fever and developed progressive distributive shock.Conclusion: This case report describes the differential diagnosis of infectious and immune-mediated inflammatory and rheumatologic segmental colitis. Non-Langerhans histiocytosis and ECD are rare causes of gastrointestinal inflammation. Prompt diagnosis is imperative for the appropriate treatment to prevent hemodynamic compromise due to distributive shock or gastrointestinal bleeding. Importantly, gastrointestinal ECD might exhibit poor response to steroid treatment and other potential treatments including chemotherapy, and biologic treatments targeting IL-1 and TNF-alpha signaling should be considered.Abbreviations: AFB: acid-fast bacilli; ECD: Erdheim-Chester Disease; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; PASD: periodic acid-Schiff with diastase; TB: tuberculosis


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 436-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Rosloff ◽  
Kunal Patel ◽  
Paul J. Feustel ◽  
Jocelyn Celestin

Background: Undifferentiated somatoform (US) idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) is considered a psychogenic disorder characterized by a lack of observable physical findings and poor response to treatment. Although failure to diagnose true anaphylaxis can have disastrous consequences, identification of US-IA is crucial to limit unnecessary expenses and use of health care resources. Objective: To better define the presentation and understand the potential relationship between US-IA and underlying psychiatric comorbidities. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 110 visits by 107 patients to our institution for evaluation and management of anaphylaxis over a 1-year period. The patients were classified as having either criteria positive (CP) or criteria negative (CN) anaphylaxis based on whether they met Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network Symposium criteria for the clinical diagnosis of anaphylaxis. Patient characteristics, including objective and subjective signs and symptoms, and the presence of psychiatric diagnoses were collected and analyzed. Statistical significance was assessed by using the Fisher exact test. A literature review of US-IA and other psychogenic forms of anaphylaxis was performed. Results: Patients with CP anaphylaxis were more likely to present with hypotension, wheezing, urticaria, and vomiting than were patients with CN anaphylaxis. The patients with CN anaphylaxis were more likely to present with subjective symptoms of sensory throat tightness or swelling compared with patients with CP anaphylaxis. No significant difference was detected in the prevalence of psychiatric conditions between the two groups. Conclusion: Patients who met previously established diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis were more likely to present with objective physical findings than those who did not meet criteria for true anaphylaxis. CN patients who presented for treatment of anaphylaxis were more likely to present with subjective symptoms. Formal diagnostic criteria should be used by clinicians when evaluating patients with suspected anaphylaxis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document