Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) U.S. data at state, county and individual practice level for soil and environmental health, 2009-2018

Author(s):  
Andrea Basche ◽  
Katherine Tully ◽  
Nora L. Álvarez-Berríos ◽  
Julian Reyes ◽  
Laura Lengnick ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (01) ◽  
pp. 357-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Obubuafo ◽  
Jeffrey Gillespie ◽  
Krishna Paudel ◽  
Seon-Ae Kim

This study uses a bivariate probit model with partial observability to examine Louisiana beef producers' awareness of the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and how awareness translates to application to the program. Results indicate that awareness of and application to the EQIP depend on portion of income derived from off-farm sources, extent of previous best management practice adoption at one's own expense, household income, farmed land that is highly erodible, contact with Natural Resource Conservation Service and extension service personnel, and producer age.


1995 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 17-21
Author(s):  
Lynette Benson

Anthropologists are increasingly confronted with concerns about environmental quality and health in the communities in which they live and work. Significant numbers of anthropologists are employed by government agencies, health departments, and nongovernmental organizations, and others serve as community advocates to promote health education. Environmental health issues are fast becoming a part of their agendas.


2018 ◽  
Vol 133 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 35S-43S ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Koehler ◽  
Megan Latshaw ◽  
Thomas Matte ◽  
Daniel Kass ◽  
Howard Frumkin ◽  
...  

Environmental quality has a profound effect on health and the burden of disease. In the United States, the environment-related burden of disease is increasingly dominated by chronic diseases. At the local level, public health practitioners realize that many policy decisions affecting environmental quality and health transcend the authorities of traditional health department programs. Healthy decisions about the built environment, including housing, transportation, and energy, require broad collaborative efforts. Environmental health professionals have an opportunity to address the shift in public health burden toward chronic diseases and play an important role in the design of healthy communities by bringing data and tools to decision makers. This article provides a guide for community leaders to consider the public health effects of decisions about the built environment. We present a conceptual framework that represents a shift from compartmentalized solutions toward an inclusive systems approach that encourages partnership across disciplines and sectors. We discuss practical tools to assist with environmental decision making, such as Health Impact Assessments, environmental public health tracking, and cumulative risk assessment. We also identify priorities in research, practice, and education to advance the role of public health in decision making to improve health, such as the Health Impact Assessment, as a core competency for environmental health practitioners. We encourage cross-disciplinary communication, research, and education that bring the fields of planning, transportation, and energy in closer collaboration with public health to jointly advance the systems approach to today’s environmental challenges.


2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narayan P. Nyaupane ◽  
Jeffrey M. Gillespie ◽  
Krishna P. Paudel

This study investigates reasons for adoption of best management practices (BMP), crawfish farmers' participation in the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), and economic impacts of BMP adoption using data from a 2008 survey of crawfish producers. Most-cited reasons for BMP adoption are farmers' perceptions of increases in profit and long-run productivity. Land tenancy, education, double-cropping or crop rotation, and proximity to a stream influence EQIP participation. Perceptions of economic profits depend on the practices used. Participation in EQIP negatively impacts farmers' perceptions of profitability from adopting BMPs. The results underscore the importance of economic incentives in promoting BMP adoption.


Humanus ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Wina Agnesia ◽  
Aldri Frinaldi ◽  
Henni Candra Gustina

This research aims to discover and analyze the effect of the development of drinking water program and environmental health in improving the quality of life in Payakumbuh city. The background of the research is the various environmental problems in Payakumbuh. This research is quantitative as well as descriptive qualitative. The population of the research is the community of Payakumbuh city in five districts. The result shows that the provision of basic sanitary system in Payakumbuh is in medium level. This can be inferred from the data analysis that shows the average basic sanitary level in 3.6 between 1 to 5 and the TCR reaches 63.20%, which means medium category. The waste management of Payakumbuh city is in medium category, where the anticipation of local waste is only 2.85 between 1 to 5 and TCR 57.00%. The drainage facility of Payakumbuh city is in medium category with the score reaching 3.13 between 1 to 5 and the TCR 62.60. The quality of environment in Payakumbuh city is quite good, shown by the score 3.25 between 1 to 5 and TCR 65.00%. This means the environmental quality of the developing city is quite good and within medium category. Therefore, it can be concluded that the development of drinking water program and environmental health contributes to the quality of environment that are proven by the sub-variables; all in medium category.Key words: drinking water, environmental health, sanitary


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-59
Author(s):  
David S. Kelleher ◽  
Geum-Soo Kim

The pursuit of sustainable development initially centered on understanding how economic development and environmental quality are related. More recently, many have focused on how political development and environmental quality are related. Researchers have examined a variety of environmental problems using a variety of political measures. While there is support for the idea that democracies outperform more authoritarian regimes on various environmental issues, the results are somewhat mixed and ambiguous, not least because the individual studies lack comparability and generalizability. To take stock and address this problem we use a comprehensive dataset of environmental performance outcomes and political variables to systematically address whether democracies do indeed outperform authoritarian regimes across a range of environmental issues. Our results suggest that for environmental issues that are tied to human health, two governance indicators, “voice and accountability” and “control of corruption,” explain international variation in environmental health indicators independently of per capita income, which is also statistically significant. Turning to measures of ecosystem vitality, unlike environmental health indicators, ecosystem measures bear more disparate relations to economic and political measures. Thus, while support for “democratic environmentalism” may only be partial, support for “authoritarian environmentalism” is non-existent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document