scholarly journals The Weak Completion Semantics and Equality

10.29007/pr47 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuelle-Anna Dietz Saldanha ◽  
Steffen Hölldobler ◽  
Sibylle Schwarz ◽  
Lim Yohanes Stefanus
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Point ◽  
Ethical Decision ◽  
Cognitive Theory ◽  
Ethical Dilemmas ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Syllogistic Reasoning ◽  
Decision Problems ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Normal Logic ◽  
Trolley Problems

The weak completion semantics is an integrated and computational cognitive theory which is based on normal logic programs,three-valued Lukasiewicz logic, weak completion, and skeptical abduction. It has been successfully applied – among others – to the suppression task, the selection task, and to human syllogistic reasoning. In order to solve ethical decision problems like – for example – trolley problems, we need to extend the weak completion semantics to deal with actions and causality. To this end we consider normal logic programs and a set E of equations as in the fluent calculus. We formally show that normal logic programs with equality admit a least E-model under the weak completion semantics and that this E-model can be computed as the least fixed point of an associated semantic operator. We show that the operator is not continuous in general, but is continuous if the logic program is a propositional, a finite-ground, or a finite datalog program and the Herbrand E-universe is finite. Finally, we show that the weak completion semantics with equality can solve a variety of ethical decision problems like the bystander case, the footbridge case, and the loop case by computing the least E-model and reasoning with respect to this E-model. The reasoning process involves counterfactuals which is necessary to model the different ethical dilemmas.

Logical Decision Problems and Complexity of Logic Programs

1987 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-33
Author(s):  
Egon Börger ◽  
Ulrich Löwen
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Point ◽  
Computational Complexity ◽  
Decision Problem ◽  
Decision Problems ◽  
Complexity Classes ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Finite Structures ◽  
Syntactic Restrictions

We survey and give new results on logical characterizations of complexity classes in terms of the computational complexity of decision problems of various classes of logical formulas. There are two main approaches to obtain such results: The first approach yields logical descriptions of complexity classes by semantic restrictions (to e.g. finite structures) together with syntactic enrichment of logic by new expressive means (like e.g. fixed point operators). The second approach characterizes complexity classes by (the decision problem of) classes of formulas determined by purely syntactic restrictions on the formation of formulas.

scholarly journals Knowledge Forgetting in Answer Set Programming

2014 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 31-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Wang ◽  
Y. Zhang ◽  
Y. Zhou ◽  
M. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Irrelevant Information ◽  
Semantic Knowledge ◽  
Decision Problems ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Substitution Principle ◽  
Answer Set

The ability of discarding or hiding irrelevant information has been recognized as an important feature for knowledge based systems, including answer set programming. The notion of strong equivalence in answer set programming plays an important role for different problems as it gives rise to a substitution principle and amounts to knowledge equivalence of logic programs. In this paper, we uniformly propose a semantic knowledge forgetting, called HT- and FLP-forgetting, for logic programs under stable model and FLP-stable model semantics, respectively. Our proposed knowledge forgetting discards exactly the knowledge of a logic program which is relevant to forgotten variables. Thus it preserves strong equivalence in the sense that strongly equivalent logic programs will remain strongly equivalent after forgetting the same variables. We show that this semantic forgetting result is always expressible; and we prove a representation theorem stating that the HT- and FLP-forgetting can be precisely characterized by Zhang-Zhou's four forgetting postulates under the HT- and FLP-model semantics, respectively. We also reveal underlying connections between the proposed forgetting and the forgetting of propositional logic, and provide complexity results for decision problems in relation to the forgetting. An application of the proposed forgetting is also considered in a conflict solving scenario.

scholarly journals Inconsistency Proofs for ASP: The ASP - DRUPE Format

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 891-907
Author(s):  
MARIO ALVIANO ◽  
CARMINE DODARO ◽  
JOHANNES K. FICHTE ◽  
MARKUS HECHER ◽  
TOBIAS PHILIPP ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Boolean Satisfiability ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Disjunctive Logic Programs ◽  
Normal Logic ◽  
Consistency Problem ◽  
Unit Propagation ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractAnswer Set Programming (ASP) solvers are highly-tuned and complex procedures that implicitly solve the consistency problem, i.e., deciding whether a logic program admits an answer set. Verifying whether a claimed answer set is formally a correct answer set of the program can be decided in polynomial time for (normal) programs. However, it is far from immediate to verify whether a program that is claimed to be inconsistent, indeed does not admit any answer sets. In this paper, we address this problem and develop the new proof format ASP-DRUPE for propositional, disjunctive logic programs, including weight and choice rules. ASP-DRUPE is based on the Reverse Unit Propagation (RUP) format designed for Boolean satisfiability. We establish correctness of ASP-DRUPE and discuss how to integrate it into modern ASP solvers. Later, we provide an implementation of ASP-DRUPE into the wasp solver for normal logic programs.

scholarly journals On the Equivalence Between Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and Logic Programs

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 941-956
Author(s):  
JOÃO ALCÂNTARA ◽  
SAMY SÁ ◽  
JUAN ACOSTA-GUADARRAMA
Keyword(s):  
Logic Program ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Stable Semantics ◽  
Acceptance Condition ◽  
Normal Logic ◽  
Normal Logic Program ◽  
Stable Models

AbstractAbstract Dialectical Frameworks (ADFs) are argumentation frameworks where each node is associated with an acceptance condition. This allows us to model different types of dependencies as supports and attacks. Previous studies provided a translation from Normal Logic Programs (NLPs) to ADFs and proved the stable models semantics for a normal logic program has an equivalent semantics to that of the corresponding ADF. However, these studies failed in identifying a semantics for ADFs equivalent to a three-valued semantics (as partial stable models and well-founded models) for NLPs. In this work, we focus on a fragment of ADFs, called Attacking Dialectical Frameworks (ADF+s), and provide a translation from NLPs to ADF+s robust enough to guarantee the equivalence between partial stable models, well-founded models, regular models, stable models semantics for NLPs and respectively complete models, grounded models, preferred models, stable models for ADFs. In addition, we define a new semantics for ADF+s, called L-stable, and show it is equivalent to the L-stable semantics for NLPs.

scholarly journals A Core Method for the Weak Completion Semantics with Skeptical Abduction (Extended Abstract)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuelle-Anna Dietz Saldanha ◽  
Steffen Hölldobler ◽  
Carroline Dewi Puspa Kencana Ramli ◽  
Luis Palacios Medinacelli
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Point ◽  
Logic Programming ◽  
Cognitive Theory ◽  
Stable State ◽  
Syllogistic Reasoning ◽  
Feed Forward ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Method ◽  
Feed Forward Network ◽  
Input Layer

The Weak Completion Semantics is a novel cognitive theory which has been successfully applied -- among others -- to the suppression task, the selection task and syllogistic reasoning. It is based on logic programming with skeptical abduction. Each weakly completed program admits a least model under the three-valued Lukasiewicz logic which can be computed as the least fixed point of an appropriate semantic operator. The operator can be represented by a three-layer feed-forward network using the Core method. Its least fixed point is the unique stable state of a recursive network which is obtained from the three-layer feed-forward core by mapping the activation of the output layer back to the input layer. The recursive network is embedded into a novel network to compute skeptical abduction. This extended abstract outlines a fully connectionist realization of the Weak Completion Semantics.

scholarly journals A Core Method for the Weak Completion Semantics with Skeptical Abduction

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 51-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuelle-Anna Dietz Saldanha ◽  
Steffen Hölldobler ◽  
Carroline Dewi Puspa Kencana Ramli ◽  
Luis Palacios Medinacelli
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Point ◽  
Cognitive Theory ◽  
Spatial Reasoning ◽  
Stable State ◽  
Syllogistic Reasoning ◽  
Bias Effect ◽  
Feed Forward ◽  
Core Method ◽  
Feed Forward Network ◽  
Input Layer

The Weak Completion Semantics is a novel cognitive theory which has been successfully applied to the suppression task, the selection task, syllogistic reasoning, the belief bias effect, spatial reasoning as well as reasoning with conditionals. It is based on logic programming with skeptical abduction. Each program admits a least model under the three-valued Lukasiewicz logic, which can be computed as the least fixed point of an appropriate semantic operator. The semantic operator can be represented by a three-layer feed-forward network using the core method. Its least fixed point is the unique stable state of a recursive network which is obtained from the three-layer feed-forward core by mapping the activation of the output layer back to the input layer. The recursive network is embedded into a novel network to compute skeptical abduction. This paper presents a fully connectionist realization of the Weak Completion Semantics.

scholarly journals On the Equivalence between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Logic Programming

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 779-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Caminada ◽  
Claudia Schulz
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
The Other ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
Reverse Translation ◽  
Normal Logic ◽  
The Relationship

Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) has been shown to subsume various other non-monotonic reasoning formalisms, among them normal logic programming (LP). We re-examine the relationship between ABA and LP and show that normal LP also subsumes (flat) ABA. More precisely, we specify a procedure that given a (flat) ABA framework yields an associated logic program with almost the same syntax whose semantics coincide with those of the ABA framework. That is, the 3-valued stable (respectively well-founded, regular, 2-valued stable, and ideal) models of the associated logic program coincide with the complete (respectively grounded, preferred, stable, and ideal) assumption labellings and extensions of the ABA framework. Moreover, we show how our results on the translation from ABA to LP can be reapplied for a reverse translation from LP to ABA, and observe that some of the existing results in the literature are in fact special cases of our work. Overall, we show that (flat) ABA frameworks can be seen as normal logic programs with a slightly different syntax. This implies that methods developed for one of these formalisms can be equivalently applied to the other by simply modifying the syntax.

scholarly journals Answer Sets for Logic Programs with Arbitrary Abstract Constraint Atoms

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 353-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. C. Son ◽  
E. Pontelli ◽  
P. H. Tu
Keyword(s):  
Logic Program ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Normal Logic ◽  
Alternative Approaches ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Answer Set Semantics ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Semantics Of Logic Programs ◽  
Normal Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set

In this paper, we present two alternative approaches to defining answer sets for logic programs with arbitrary types of abstract constraint atoms (c-atoms). These approaches generalize the fixpoint-based and the level mapping based answer set semantics of normal logic programs to the case of logic programs with arbitrary types of c-atoms. The results are four different answer set definitions which are equivalent when applied to normal logic programs. The standard fixpoint-based semantics of logic programs is generalized in two directions, called answer set by reduct and answer set by complement. These definitions, which differ from each other in the treatment of negation-as-failure (naf) atoms, make use of an immediate consequence operator to perform answer set checking, whose definition relies on the notion of conditional satisfaction of c-atoms w.r.t. a pair of interpretations. The other two definitions, called strongly and weakly well-supported models, are generalizations of the notion of well-supported models of normal logic programs to the case of programs with c-atoms. As for the case of fixpoint-based semantics, the difference between these two definitions is rooted in the treatment of naf atoms. We prove that answer sets by reduct (resp. by complement) are equivalent to weakly (resp. strongly) well-supported models of a program, thus generalizing the theorem on the correspondence between stable models and well-supported models of a normal logic program to the class of programs with c-atoms. We show that the newly defined semantics coincide with previously introduced semantics for logic programs with monotone c-atoms, and they extend the original answer set semantics of normal logic programs. We also study some properties of answer sets of programs with c-atoms, and relate our definitions to several semantics for logic programs with aggregates presented in the literature.

LOGIC PROGRAMMING AND DEFAULT LOGIC

1994 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 367-373
Author(s):  
GRIGORIS ANTONIOU
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Operational Semantics ◽  
Main Property ◽  
Default Logic ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Default Theory ◽  
Normal Logic ◽  
Direct Use

We present several ideas of increasing complexity how to translate default theories to normal logic programs that make direct use of the deductive capacity of logic programming. We show the limitations of simple, ad hoc approaches, and arrive at a more general construction; its main property is that the answer substitutions computed by the logic program via its standard operational semantics correspond exactly to the extensions of the default theory.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document