scholarly journals Características de consumo para salas de cine de arte en México (Consumption characteristics for Mexican art movie theaters)

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (28) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Fernando Lozano Treviño

El presente artículo de investigación analiza el carácter del cine como obra de arte y su relación en los mercados cinematográficos. Detalla cómo las Organizaciones de Producción Cinematográficas (OPC) trabajan en la estética de la película. Se presenta el desarrollo del cine de arte dentro de la industria cinematográfica mexicana y los espacios existentes donde los directores y las OPC se relacionan con distribuidores y exhibidores. Se mencionan los géneros cinematográficos y su funcionamiento como herramienta cultural. Algunos beneficios para el público del cine como arte son expuestos. Se ubica la correlación que hay entre los deseos de los espectadores porque las películas que se proyectan en salas de arte estimulen entre los espectadores el aprecio a las artes, la reflexión, el aprendizaje y el entretenimiento con el gasto mensual en pesos para ver películas que antepongan el arte sobre cualquier otra característica del cine.Palabras clave: arte, cultura, espectadores, ingresos, organizaciones de producción cinema- tográficas. Abstract:This research paper analyzes the character of cinema as a work of art and its relation in the cinematographic markets. It details the way in which Film Production Organizations (OPC) works on the aesthetics ways in movies. It shows the development of the art cinema within the Mexican film industry and the spaces where filmmakers and OPC interacts with distribution and exhibition companies. Film genres are mentioned and how they work as a cultural tools. Some benefits to the audience cinema art are exposed. It runs a correlation between the desires of the spectators for movies in art halls that stimulates among the audience the appreciation of arts, reflection, learning and entertainment with the monthly expenditure in pesos to watch films that places art before any other feature of the cinema.Key words: art, culture, income, film production organizations, spectators.

Author(s):  
Jacqueline Avila

Cinesonidos: Film Music and National Identity During Mexico’s Época de Oro is the first book-length study concerning the function of music in the prominent genres structured by the Mexican film industry. Integrating primary source material with film music studies, sound studies, and Mexican film and cultural history, this project closely examines examples from five significant film genres that developed during the 1930s through 1950s. These genres include the prostitute melodrama, the fictional indigenista film (films on indigenous themes or topics), the cine de añoranza porfiriana (films of Porfirian nostalgia), the revolutionary melodrama, and the comedia ranchera (ranch comedy). The musics in these films helped create and accentuate the tropes and archetypes considered central to Mexican cultural nationalism. Distinct in narrative and structure, each genre exploits specific, at times contradictory, aspects of Mexicanidad—the cultural identity of the Mexican people—and, as such, employs different musics to concretize those constructions. Throughout this turbulent period, these tropes and archetypes mirrored changing perceptions of Mexicanidad manufactured by the state and popular and transnational culture. Several social and political agencies were heavily invested in creating a unified national identity to merge the previously fragmented populace owing to the Mexican Revolution (1910–ca.1920). The commercial medium of film became an important tool in acquainting a diverse urban audience with the nuances of national identity, and music played an essential and persuasive role in the process. In this heterogeneous environment, cinema and its music continuously reshaped the contested, fluctuating space of Mexican identity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Fernando Lozano Treviño

Keywords: arts, consumption, entertainment, film production organizations, LozanoBarragan syndromeAbstract. This research paper has as main purpose to determine which film model is more convenient for the Mexican film production organizations in the search of increasing the possibilities of spectators to attend and watch their movies. The character that the films have as popular and academic arts and the elements that compose it is analyzed. We study the way in which motion pictures work as cultural tools. We highlight the importance of movies as an entertainment product and how this aspect impacts in the consumption of movie tickets in the box office. Lozano-Barragan syndrome is detailed and how filmmakers can suffer this artistic, marketing and economic discomfort. Finally, we make some linear regressions to determine the impact that the film models inclusions have on increasing the possibilities of spectators attending to the films.Palabras clave: arte, consumo, entretenimiento, organizaciones de producción cinematográfica, síndrome Lozano-Barragán.Resumen. Este artículo de investigación tiene como finalidad determinar qué modelo cinematográfico es más conveniente para las Organizaciones de Producción Cinematográficas Mexicanas en la búsqueda de aumentar las posibilidades de que los espectadores asistan a ver sus películas. Se analiza el carácter que el cine tiene como arte popular y académico, así como los elementos que lo conforman. Se estudia la manera en que las películas funcionan como herramienta cultural. Se resalta la importancia del cine como producto de entretenimiento y cómo esta cualidad impacta en el consumo de boletos en taquilla. Se detalla el síndrome Lozano-Barragán y cómo los cineastas pueden padecer este malestar artístico, mercadológico y económico. Finalmente, se efectúan regresiones lineales para determinar el impacto que tiene la inclusión de los modelos cinematográficos en el incremento de las posibilidades de asistencia para ver las películas.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Lozano ◽  
José N. Barragán ◽  
Sergio Guerra

Key Words: Film business, film consumption, film market, film production, culture.Abstract: The main purpose of this document to state the importance of the films not only as a cultural generator, but also as an economical and industrial engine for the Country of origin. It establishes, mainly the importance that producers and directors have to play in these two film slopes of movie business: as a culture product and as a consumption product. It shows the contribution that the 7th art has given to the United States obtaining importantblockbusters and as a mean in which this Country has influenced in the values and the desires of others. We expose what, years ago, the film industry represented to Mexico during the “Golden Era” (“Epoca de Oro”), how it declined and which mechanisms are being implemented by the government to stimulate this industry. On the other hand, we give detailed information of what the Mexican film makers could do to impulse the industry.Palabras Clave: Consumo de películas, cultura, mercado del cine, negocios deproducciones cinematográficas, producción cinematográfica.Resumen: El presente documento tiene como finalidad plasmar la importancia de los negocios dedicados a la producción cinematográfica no sólo como generadores de cultural sino también como motor económico y empresarial del país de origen. Se establece la importancia que tienen principalmente los productores y directores de actuar en estas dos vertientes del negocio del cine: como cultura y como producto de consumo. Se plantea el aporte que han hecho en los Estados Unidos los negocios de producción cinematográfica recaudando importantes sumas de dinero en taquilla y como medio por el cual este país hainfluido en los valores y deseos de los demás. Se expone lo que alguna vez la producción de cine representó para México durante su “Época de Oro”, cómo declinó y qué mecanismos se están implementando para estimular a los negocios dedicados a este giro. Por otro lado, se puntualiza lo que este tipo de negocios en México pudieran hacer para impulsar la industria.


Author(s):  
Sarah Atkinson

From Film Practice to Data Process critically examines the practices of independent digital feature filmmaking in contemporary Britain. The business of conventional feature filmmaking is like no other, in that it assembles a huge company of people from a range of disciplines on a temporary basis, all to engage in the collaborative endeavour of producing a unique, one-off piece of work. The book explicitly interrogates what is happening at the frontiers of contemporary ‘digital film’ production at a key transitional moment in 2012, when both the film industry and film-production practices were situated between the two distinct medium polarities of film and digital. With an in-depth case study of Sally Potter’s 2012 film Ginger & Rosa, drawing upon interviews with international film industry practitioners, From Film Practice to Data Process is an examination of film production in its totality, in a moment of profound change.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Feng Mon

This book uses the potent case study of contemporary Taiwanese queer romance films to address the question of how capitalism in Taiwan has privileged the film industry at the expense of the audience's freedom to choose and respond to culture on its own terms. Interweaving in-depth interviews with filmmakers, producers, marketers, and spectators, Ya-Fong Mon takes a biopolitical approach to the question, showing how the industry uses investments in techno-science, ancillary marketing, and media convergence to seduce and control the sensory experience of the audience-yet that control only extends so far: volatility remains a key component of the film-going experience.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Heqiang Zhou ◽  
Lei Que

With the in-depth influence of 5G technology on film art, the postmodern culture contained in it is also becoming more and more obvious. Understanding the context of the 5G era and clarifying the origin of film postmodernism culture will help us deeply analyze the cause of the rise of postmodernism film culture, especially the important influence of the expansion of film application scenes, the innovation of the whole industry chain and the evolution of film aesthetics on the rise of postmodernism film culture. In addition, we should also think deeply about the film culture under the post-modernism of 5G era, and explore the way to stick to the benign development of film creation and film industry. To enhance our cognition and appreciation of post-modern film culture, to give play to the positive factors of post-modern film culture, and to promote the healthy and prosperous development of Chinese film production, creation and industry.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 100-117
Author(s):  
Kingsley Chukwuemeka Anyira ◽  
Divine Sheriff Uchenna Joe

The art of video film directing is all encompassing as the director deals with virtually all aspects of film production. This comes with herculean challenges that tend to mar the efforts of directors if not properly addressed. Film scholars cum critics have done a lot of work investing the challenges of the Nigerian Video Film industry with little or no effort to directly ascertain the peculiar challenges of each sector of the industry. To this effect, the paper seeks to source from the directors what these challenges have been over the decade in view and as well through the affected, proffer plausible suppositions asmeasure to ameliorate the identified challenges. In doing so, this paper adopts the view point that the director is the author of the film and thus engages the Survey research method wherein Personal interviews are employed as data collation tool and later analyzed with inferences made from the responses. Conclusively, it anchors on the directors’ views of possible ways to improve/enhance the director’s art in future productions.


Author(s):  
Catriona Kelly

This book examines cinema in the Brezhnev era from the perspective of one of the USSR’s largest studios, Lenfilm. Producing around thirty feature films per year, the studio had over three thousand employees working in every area of film production. The discussion covers the period from 1961 to the collapse of centralized state facilities in 1986. The book focuses particularly on the younger directors at Lenfilm, those who joined the studio in the recruiting drive that followed Khrushchev’s decision to expand film production. Drawing on documents from archives, the analysis portrays film production “in the round” and shows that the term “censorship” is less appropriate than the description preferred in the Soviet film industry itself, “control,” which referred to a no less exigent but far more complex and sophisticated process. The book opens with four framing chapters that examine the overall context in which films were produced: the various crises that beset film production between 1961 and 1969 (chapter 1) and 1970 and 1985 (chapter 2), the working life of the studio, and particularly the technical aspects of production (chapter 3), and the studio aesthetic (chapter 4). The second part of the book comprises close analyses of fifteen films that are typical of the studio’s production. The book concludes with a brief survey of Lenfilm’s history after the Fifth Congress of the Filmmakers’ Union in 1986, which swept away the old management structures and, in due course, the entire system of filmmaking in the USSR.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-197
Author(s):  
Llewella Chapman

From the early 1960s, the British film industry was increasingly reliant on American studio financed ‘runaway’ productions. Alexander Walker identifies United Artists and Universal Pictures as two of the major players in the trend he dubbed ‘Hollywood England’. This article offers a close examination of the role of two studios in the financing of British film production by making extensive use of the Film Finances Archive. It focuses on two case studies: Tom Jones (1963) and Isadora (1968), both of which had completion guarantees from Film Finances, and will argue that Tony Richardson and Karel Reisz, two of the key British New Wave directors, lost their previous ability to direct films to budget and within schedule when they had the financial resources of American studios behind them. It will analyse how, due to a combination of ‘artistic’ intent and Hollywood money, Richardson and Reisz separately created two of the most notorious ‘runaways’ that ran away during the 1960s.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document