scholarly journals Overview of Polymers for Improved Oil Recovery Treatments

Author(s):  
Mohamed Saeed Shamlooh1 ◽  
Ahmed Hamza ◽  
Ibnelwaleed Hussein ◽  
Mustafa Nasser ◽  
Saeed Salehi

High water production in oil and gas wells reduces significantly the recovery factor. Mechanical as well as chemical methods are applied to shut off water productive zones. Crosslinked polymers showed high efficiency to seal off water zones in high permeability sandstone and fractured carbonate reservoirs. Moreover, emulsified polymeric formulations have been introduced for deep profile modification by changing the wettability of the rock and hence allowing selective plugging of water. This poster provides an overview of the polymeric formulations used for such application.

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dick Jacob Ligthelm ◽  
Paul Jacob van den Hoek ◽  
Pascal Hos ◽  
Marinus J. Faber ◽  
Roeland Roeterdink

2016 ◽  
pp. 71-74
Author(s):  
E. F. Zakharova ◽  
E. V. Levanova ◽  
G. N. Farkhutdinov

The efficiency of different physical and chemical technologies used in various areas and Romashkinskoye New-Elkhovskoye oil fields was researched. The result was a conclusion that at high water-cut objects, restriction of movement of water in highly permeable leached zones of a productive layer is one of the main conditions for increasing the efficiency of not only flooding, but also the use of physical and chemical methods based on improving of oil extraction factor.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rene Tabary ◽  
Antoine Fornari ◽  
Brigitte Bazin ◽  
Bernard Jean Bourbiaux ◽  
Christine S.H. Dalmazzone

Author(s):  
Pertiwi Andarani ◽  
Arya Rezagama

The exploration and production process of oil and its supporting operations always generates wasteas by-product. If they are uncontrolled, it might decrease the environmental quality. Thus, it isnecessary to manage and treat the waste in order to meet the regulation standard of quality andquantity. PT XYZ is an energy company, particularly oil and gas production, which its productionactivity generate a large amount of waste as well as produced water. Thus, PT XYZ must havefacilities or produced water handling plant which could minimize pollution caused by produced water.PT XYZ already has a system of produced water handling with recycling principle. After oil and waterseparation including water treating at Water Treating Plant (WTP), produced water will be used forsteam injection. This is the part of enhanced oil recovery by steam flooding in Duri Field. Besides,produced water could be used as backwash water at WTP, that is Oil Removal Filter (ORF) and WaterSoftener, which is called brine water. If the produced water and brine water is over load the capacity ofoil enhanced recovery injection, it might be disposed through injection to Disposal Well and there arecertain condition that produced water should be discharged into canal. The objective f this study is toanalyze the performance of a water treating plant in PT XYZ. Water Treating Plant is a facility fortreating produced water. Basically, WTP is on good condition and each unit has high efficiency forseparating oil and water (60-99%). Horizontal velocity at pit #A of API Separator was larger than thedesign criteria. In addition, Water Softeners have efficiency until 99% for the hardness.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamad AL-Rashidi ◽  
Mahmoud Reda Aly Hussein Hussein ◽  
Abdulaziz Erhamah ◽  
Satinder Malik ◽  
Abdulrahman AL-Hajri ◽  
...  

Abstract Large reserves of High-Viscous Oil in Kuwait calls for Improved Oil Recovery scenarios. In Kuwait unconsolidated sandstone formations, the sandstone intervals represent extensive reservoir intervals of sand separated by laterally extensive non-reservoir intervals that comprise finer-grained, argillaceous sands, silts and muds. The reservoir is shallow with high permeability (above 1000 mD) and under bottom aquifer pressure support. Due to strong viscosity contrast between oil and water, after breakthrough, the water cut rises quickly resulting in strong loss of production efficiency. Mitigating water production is thus mandatory to improve production conditions. The candidate wells have 2 to 3 open intervals in different rock facies with comingle production. The total perforated length is between 38 and 48 ft. Production is through PCP at a rate of around 300 bpd and BS&W is between 71 and 87%. The technology applied utilizes pre-gelled size-controlled product (SMG Microgels) having RPM properties, i.e. inducing a strong drop of relative permeability to water without affecting oil relative permeability. The size is chosen to selectively treat the high-permeability water producing zones while preserving the lower-permeability oil zones. The chemical can also withstand downhole harsh conditions such as salinity of around 170,000ppm and presence of 2% H2S. The treatment consisted of bullhead injection of 300 bbls of pre-gelled chemical through tubing. The first results seem very favourable, sincefor two wells, the water cut has dropped from 80 to 40% with almost same gross production rate. The incremental oil is more than 100 bopd. The third well did not show marked change after WSO treatment. The wells are under continuous monitoring to assess long-term performance. Such result, if confirmed, may lead to high possibilities for the improvement of heavy-oil reservoir production under aquifer support by mitigating water production with simple chemical bullhead injection.


Author(s):  
Craig M. Bethke

In efforts to increase and extend production from oil and gas fields, as well as to keep wells operational, petroleum engineers pump a wide variety of fluids into the subsurface. Fluids are injected into petroleum reservoirs for a number of purposes, including: • Waterflooding, where an available fresh or saline water is injected into the reservoir to displace oil toward producing wells. • Improved Oil Recovery (IOR), where a range of more exotic fluids such as steam (hot water), caustic solutions, carbon dioxide, foams, polymers, surfactants, and so on are injected to improve recovery beyond what might be obtained by waterflooding alone. • Near-well treatments, in which chemicals are injected into producing and sometimes injector wells, where they are intended to react with the reservoir rock. Well stimulation techniques such as acidization, for example, are intended to increase the formation's permeability. Alternatively, producing wells may receive “squeeze treatments” in which a mineral scale inhibitor is injected into the formation. In this case, the treatment is designed so that the inhibitor sorbs onto mineral surfaces, where it can gradually desorb into the formation water during production. • Pressure management, where fluid is injected into oil fields in order to maintain adequate fluid pressure in reservoir rocks. Calcium carbonate may precipitate as mineral scale, for example, if pressure is allowed to deteriorate, especially in fields where formation fluids are rich in Ca++ and HCO3- and CO2 fugacity is high. In each of these procedures, the injected fluid can be expected to be far from equilibrium with sediments and formation waters. As such, it is likely to react extensively once it enters the formation, causing some minerals to dissolve and others to precipitate. Hutcheon (1984) appropriately refers to this process as “artificial diagenesis,” drawing an analogy to the role of groundwater flow in the diagenesis of natural sediments (see Chapter 19). Further reaction is likely if the injected fluid breaks through to producing wells and mixes there with formation waters. There is considerable potential, therefore, for mineral scale, such as barium sulfate (see the next section), to form during these procedures.


Author(s):  
V. V. Mukhametshin ◽  
◽  
R. N. Bakhtizin ◽  
L. S. Kuleshova ◽  
A. P. Stabinskas ◽  
...  

For the conditions of deposits in Jurassic and Paleozoic terrigenous reservoirs of the Sherkalinsky trough and Shaimsky swell of Western Siberia, a criterion analysis and screening of enhanced oil recovery techniques used in the fields of the West Siberian oil and gas province were carried out. For various groups of oil fields, a set of the most effective technologies for the development of residual hard-to-recover reserves of flooded fields has been proposed. The areas for effective application of the selected techniques for deposits introduced into development within the considered tectonic-stratigraphic elements are determined. The areas determination was carried out on the basis of 19 parameters characterizing the geological-physical and physical-chemical properties of formations and fluids, as well as the maximum and minimum values of the canonical discriminant functions determined by the situational map. Based on the numerical modeling of oil recovery processes, a forecast of an increase in the final oil recovery factor was made for five facilities-field test sites of the selected groups of facilities. Keywords: hard-to-recover reserves; terrigenous reservoirs; factor analysis; enhanced oil recovery techniques; numerical modeling; criterion analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document