scholarly journals PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM ON DIABETES HEALTHCARE DATASET

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 260-266
Author(s):  
Subhankar Manna ◽  
Malathi G.

Healthcare industry collects huge amount of unclassified data every day.  For an effective diagnosis and decision making, we need to discover hidden data patterns. An instance of such dataset is associated with a group of metabolic diseases that vary greatly in their range of attributes. The objective of this paper is to classify the diabetic dataset using classification techniques like Naive Bayes, ID3 and k means classification. The secondary objective is to study the performance of various classification algorithms used in this work. We propose to implement the classification algorithm using R package. This work used the dataset that is imported from the UCI Machine Learning Repository, Diabetes 130-US hospitals for years 1999-2008 Data Set. Motivation/Background: Naïve Bayes is a probabilistic classifier based on Bayes theorem. It provides useful perception for understanding many algorithms. In this paper when Bayesian algorithm applied on diabetes dataset, it shows high accuracy. Is assumes variables are independent of each other. In this paper, we construct a decision tree from diabetes dataset in which it selects attributes at each other node of the tree like graph and model, each branch represents an outcome of the test, and each node hold a class attribute. This technique separates observation into branches to construct tree. In this technique tree is split in a recursive way called recursive partitioning. Decision tree is widely used in various areas because it is good enough for dataset distribution. For example, by using ID3 (Decision tree) algorithm we get a result like they are belong to diabetes or not. Method: We will use Naïve Bayes for probabilistic classification and ID3 for decision tree.  Results: The dataset is related to Diabetes dataset. There are 18 columns like – Races, Gender, Take_metformin, Take_repaglinide, Insulin, Body_mass_index, Self_reported_health etc. and 623 rows. Naive Bayes Classifier algorithm will be used for getting the probability of having diabetes or not. Here Diabetes is the class for Diabetes data set. There are two conditions “Yes” and “No” and have some personal information about the patient like - Races, Gender, Take_metformin, Take_repaglinide, Insulin, Body_mass_index, Self_reported_health etc. We will see the probability that for “Yes” what unit of probability and for “No” what unit of probability which is given bellow. For Example: Gender – Female have 0.4964 for “No” and 0.5581 for “Yes” and for Male 0.5035 is for “No” and 0.4418 for “Yes”. Conclusions: In this paper two algorithms had been implemented Naive Bayes Classifier algorithm and ID3 algorithm. From Naive Bayes Classifier algorithm, the probability of having diabetes has been predicted and from ID3 algorithm a decision tree has been generated.

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Yuris Alkhalifi ◽  
Ainun Zumarniansyah ◽  
Rian Ardianto ◽  
Nila Hardi ◽  
Annisa Elfina Augustia

Non-Cash Food Assistance or Bantuan Pangan Non-Tunai (BPNT) is food assistance from the government given to the Beneficiary Family (KPM) every month through an electronic account mechanism that is used only to buy food at the Electronic Shop Mutual Assistance Joint Business Group Hope Family Program (e-Warong KUBE PKH ) or food traders working with Bank Himbara. In its distribution, BPNT still has problems that occur that are experienced by the village apparatus especially the apparatus of Desa Wanasari on making decisions, which ones are worthy of receiving (poor) and not worthy of receiving (not poor). So one way that helps in making decisions can be done through the concept of data mining. In this study, a comparison of 2 algorithms will be carried out namely Naive Bayes Classifier and Decision Tree C.45. The total sample used is as much as 200 head of household data which will then be divided into 2 parts into validation techniques is 90% training data and 10% test data of the total sample used then the proposed model is made in the RapidMiner application and then evaluated using the Confusion Matrix table to find out the highest level of accuracy from 2 of these methods. The results in this classification indicate that the level of accuracy in the Naive Bayes Classifier method is 98.89% and the accuracy level in the Decision Tree C.45 method is 95.00%. Then the conclusion that in this study the algorithm with the highest level of accuracy is the Naive Bayes Classifier algorithm method with a difference in the accuracy rate of 3.89%.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 4105-4110

In the current scenario, the researchers are focusing towards health care project for the prediction of the disease and its type. In addition to the prediction, there exists a need to find the influencing parameter that directly related to the disease prediction. The analysis of the parameters needed to the prediction of the disease still remains a challenging issue. With this view, we focus on predicting the heart disease by applying the dataset with boosting the parameters of the dataset. The heart disease data set extracted from UCI Machine Learning Repository is used for implementation. The anaconda Navigator IDE along with Spyder is used for implementing the Python code. Our contribution is folded is folded in three ways. First, the data preprocessing is done and the attribute relationship is identified by the correlation values. Second, the data set is fitted to random boost regressor and the important features are identified. Third, the dataset is feature scaled reduced and then fitted to random forest classifier, decision tree classifier, Naïve bayes classifier, logistic regression classifier, kernel support vector machine and KNN classifier. Fourth, the dataset is reduced with principal component analysis with five components and then fitted to the above mentioned classifiers. Fifth, the performance of the classifiers is analyzed with the metrics like accuracy, recall, fscore and precision. Experimental results shows that, the Naïve bayes classifier is more effective with the precision, Recall and Fscore of 0.89 without random boost, 0.88 with random boosting and 0.90 with principal component analysis. Experimental results show, the Naïve bayes classifier is more effective with the accuracy of 89% without random boost, 90% with random boosting and 91% with principal component analysis.


Author(s):  
Neli Kalcheva ◽  
◽  
Maya Todorova ◽  
Ginka Marinova ◽  
◽  
...  

The purpose of the publication is to analyse popular classification algorithms in machine learning. The following classifiers were studied: Naive Bayes Classifier, Decision Tree and AdaBoost Ensemble Algorithm. Their advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Research shows that there is no comprehensive universal method or algorithm for classification in machine learning. Each method or algorithm works well depending on the specifics of the task and the data used.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dito Putro Utomo ◽  
Mesran Mesran

Heart disease is a disease with a high mortality rate, there are 12 million deaths each year worldwide. This is what causes the need for early diagnosis to find out the heart disease. But the process of diagnosis is quite challenging because of the complex relationship between the attributes of heart disease. So it is important to know the main attributes that are used as a decision making process or the classification process in heart disease. In this study the dataset used has 57 types of attributes in it. So that reduction is needed to shorten the diagnostic process, the reduction process can be carried out using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method. The PCA method itself can be combined with data mining calcification techniques to measure the accuracy of the dataset. This study compares the accuracy rate using the C5.0 algorithm and the Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) algorithm, the results obtained both after and before the reduction are Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) algorithms that have better performance than the C5.0 algorithm


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 1886-1891
Author(s):  
Rizal Syarifuddin ◽  
Rosmiati Rosmiati

Kecelakaan laut yang mengakibatkan musibah tenggelamnya kapal laut angkutan barang dan orang diakibatkan salah satunya adalah faktor cuaca. Akses akan informasi perkiraan cuaca menjadi penting sebelum kapten kapal laut memutuskan untuk melakukan pelayaran. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan melakukan penghitungan menggunakan algoritma naïve bayes dalam membantu kapten kapal mengambil keputusan untuk berlayar atau tidak. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada kapal roro penyeberangan laut dari pelabuhan bira Kabupaten Bulukumba ke Pelabuhan Benteng Kepulauan Selayar. Kriteria atau atribut yang digunakan untuk mengklasifikasi diperoleh dari data badan meterologi dan geofisika terkait parameter cuaca seperti angina didaratan dan buih gelombang laut sebagai atribut. Hasil pengujian penghitungan menunjukkan bahwa data set tersebut dapat diimplementasikan pada penghitungan algorithma naïve bayes untuk dipakai mengambil keputusan untuk melakukan pelayaran.


Author(s):  
M. Khairul Anam ◽  
Bunga Nanti Pikir ◽  
Muhammad Bambang Firdaus

Pemerintah Pekanbaru saat ini sudah menerapkan teknologi dalam sistem pemerintahan, penerapannya saat ini masih mendapat keluhan dari masyarakat seperti layanan publik command center yang hanya sebagian masyarakat mengetahuinya dan penerapan cctv yang ada di Alat Pemberi Isyarat Lalu Lintas (APILL) yang belum berfungsi dengan baik. Penerapan teknologi lainnya oleh Pemerintah Pekanbaru dapat kita lihat dari keberadaan portal-portal web situs resmi Pemerintah. Sedangkan untuk melihat beragam komentar netizen dari twitter. Twitter menjadi tempat untuk mendapatkan data yang diungkapkan masyarakat melalui tweets yang diposting ke timeline. Analisa sentimen dilakukan untuk melihat pendapat atau kecenderungan opini netizen terhadap pemerintah Pekanbaru yang mengandung sentimen positif, negatif, dan netral. Data yang digunakan adalah tweet dengan jumlah dataset sebanyak 150 tweets. Data tersebut kemudian di analisa agar menjadi informasi. Analisa dilakukan menggunakan metode data mining yaitu Naïve Bayes Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), dan Decision tree. Penggunaan ketiga pendekatan ini berupaya untuk mengkategorikan hasil komentar netizen terkait penggunaan teknologi yang telah melalui proses analisis sentimen dan membandingkan keakuratan ketiga cara tersebut. Hasil akurasi yang didapatkan cukup beragam yaitu dari metode Naïve Bayes akurasi 100%, metode KKN akurasi 98,25%, dan metode decision tree akurasi 62,28%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document