A Social Dilemma of the Nuclear Energy Issue in South Korea: How Social Value Orientation and Trust in Nuclear Energy Control Affect Individuals’ Behavioral Intentions

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-311
Author(s):  
Hyung Min Lee ◽  
Jin-Woo Park
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
Behavioral Intentions ◽  
Nuclear Energy ◽  
Social Dilemma ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Energy Control ◽  
Energy Issue

scholarly journals Social Value Orientation On Corruption Prisoners

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 245-252
Author(s):  
Agus Mulyana ◽  
Aulia Iskandarsyah ◽  
Ahmad Gimmy Prathama Siswadi ◽  
Wilis Srisayekti
Keyword(s):  
Social Values ◽  
Cooperative Behavior ◽  
Social Dilemma ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Personal Interest ◽  
Common Interests ◽  
Values Orientation ◽  
Personal Interests

Social value orientation is a psychological factor that can influence cooperative behavior. In social values orientation, the prosocial type promotes cooperation while proself type is not. A social dilemma is a situation where to be cooperative or not. Corruption behavior is one of the contexts of social dilemmas. Someone who commits corruption means he/she shows non-cooperative behavior. It is hypothesized that someone who commits corruption is a self-type social values orientation because he/she prioritizes personal interests and is not cooperative. This study aims to explore how social value orientation types on corruption prisoners. Data collection in this study used a questionnaire distributed to participants and interview. The study found that not all corruptors are proself types and focused on personal interest. Individuals of prosocial types who focus on common interests can also commit corruption. Corruption perpetrators believe that anyone who is in their position will commit corruption. There is another psychological aspect that can encourage someone to commit corruption.

scholarly journals The path to cooperative action during group social dilemmas: A literature review, set of propositions, and model describing how the opportunity to communicate encourages cooperation

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 54-83
Author(s):  
Charles Pavitt ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Social Dilemma ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Individual Decision ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Cooperative Action ◽  
Term Benefit

A social dilemma is a circumstance in which each of an aggregate of people must make an individual decision whether to acquire a short-term benefit for themselves or to forego some of that benefit for the long-term benefit of the aggregate. The intent of this essay is to describe how communication, in terms of both the opportunity to talk and the content of what is said, interacts with other “cooperative mechanisms” – group identity, reciprocity and equity norms, and trust and trustworthiness – to largely determine individual cooperation versus defection. Two variables with relatively complex impacts on the cooperative mechanisms – social value orientation and group size – are also discussed. A model and set of propositions relating these variables are also included, and areas for further are explored.

scholarly journals A Social Dilemma Analysis of Commuting Preferences: The Roles of Social Value Orientation and Trust1

1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 796-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. M. Van Lange ◽  
Mark Van Vugt ◽  
Ree M. Meertens ◽  
Rob A. C. Ruiter
Keyword(s):  
Social Dilemma ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation

Theories and Measurement Methods of Social Value Orientation Related to Decision Making

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen ZHANG ◽  
Fan ZHANG ◽  
Liang HUANG ◽  
Bo YUAN ◽  
Yiwen WANG
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Measurement Methods ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation

scholarly journals Social Value Orientation Modulates Fairness Processing During Social Decision-Making: Evidence From Behavior and Brain Potentials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinmu Hu ◽  
Xiaoqin Mai
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Ultimatum Game ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Emotional Reactions ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Social Decision ◽  
Frontal Negativity ◽  
Social Decision Making

Abstract Social value orientation (SVO) characterizes stable individual differences by an inherent sense of fairness in outcome allocations. Using the event-related potential (ERP), this study investigated differences in fairness decision-making behavior and neural bases between individuals with prosocial and proself orientations using the Ultimatum Game (UG). Behavioral results indicated that prosocials were more prone to rejecting unfair offers with stronger negative emotional reactions compared with proselfs. ERP results revealed that prosocials showed a larger P2 when receiving fair offers than unfair ones in a very early processing stage, whereas such effect was absent in proselfs. In later processing stages, although both groups were sensitive to fairness as reflected by an enhanced medial frontal negativity (MFN) for unfair offers and a larger P3 for fair offers, prosocials exhibited a stronger fairness effect on these ERP components relative to proselfs. Furthermore, the fairness effect on the MFN mediated the SVO effect on rejecting unfair offers. Findings regarding emotional experiences, behavioral patterns, and ERPs provide compelling evidence that SVO modulates fairness processing in social decision-making, whereas differences in neural responses to unfair vs. fair offers as evidenced by the MFN appear to play important roles in the SVO effect on behavioral responses to unfairness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document