Establishing cooperation in a mixed-motive social dilemma. An fMRI study investigating the role of social value orientation and dispositional trust

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Griet Emonds ◽  
Carolyn H. Declerck ◽  
Christophe Boone ◽  
Ruth Seurinck ◽  
Rik Achten
Keyword(s):  
Social Dilemma ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Fmri Study ◽  
Dispositional Trust

Individuele verschillen in graaigedrag

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maaike Jongenelen ◽  
Roos Vonk
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
High Power ◽  
Role Playing ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Equal Share ◽  
Power Scale ◽  
Role Playing Game

Individual differences in money-grabbing: The role of entitlement, social value orientation, and misuse of power Individual differences in money-grabbing: The role of entitlement, social value orientation, and misuse of power M. Jongenelen & R. Vonk, Gedrag & Organisatie, volume 20, November 2007, nr. 4, pp. 369-381 This research investigates the role of individual differences in money-grabbing. Feelings of entitlement, high scores on the Misuse of Power scale and a pro-self focus were expected to lead to grabbing behaviour in high-power individuals. While playing a manager in a role-playing game, participants had the opportunity to grab more valuable points then their equal share. Results showed that pro-self participants grabbed more than pro-socials. Among the pro-self participants, feelings of entitlement led to higher Misuse of Power scores which, in turn, led to more grabbing. Entitlement en Misuse of Power had no effect on grabbing in pro-socials. It is concluded that power does not corrupt absolutely: Individual differences predict how a powerful person will behave. Implications for business settings are dealt with in the discussion.

How Incomplete Information of Team Member Contributions Affects Subsequent Contributions: The Moderating Role of Social Value Orientation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler F. Thomas ◽  
Todd A. Thornock
Keyword(s):  
Team Member ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Input Information ◽  
Team Project ◽  
Types Of Information ◽  
Output Information

In this study, we investigate how team members' social value orientation (SVO) affects their contributions to a team project when different types of information about other team members' effort is known. Specifically, we examine the team contributions made by proselfs and prosocials after they learn either the input provided or output achieved by other team members. Proselfs subsequently contributed less following input information compared to output information because they can use input information opportunistically to justify their own lower contributions. Conversely, prosocials contributed more after receiving input information compared to output information because they perceive input information as being more psychologically meaningful. Finally, proself teams with output information perform similarly to prosocial teams with either type of information. These findings provide insight into how information about team member contributions and SVO affect individuals' subsequent team contributions, and how output information can help mitigate proselfs' free-riding tendencies and improve team performance.

Aggression as a Motive for Gossip During Conflict: The Role of Power, Social Value Orientation, and Counterpart's Behavior

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emile Jeuken ◽  
Bianca Beersma ◽  
Femke S. ten Velden ◽  
Maria T. M. Dijkstra
Keyword(s):  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation

scholarly journals Social Value Orientation On Corruption Prisoners

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 245-252
Author(s):  
Agus Mulyana ◽  
Aulia Iskandarsyah ◽  
Ahmad Gimmy Prathama Siswadi ◽  
Wilis Srisayekti
Keyword(s):  
Social Values ◽  
Cooperative Behavior ◽  
Social Dilemma ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Personal Interest ◽  
Common Interests ◽  
Values Orientation ◽  
Personal Interests

Social value orientation is a psychological factor that can influence cooperative behavior. In social values orientation, the prosocial type promotes cooperation while proself type is not. A social dilemma is a situation where to be cooperative or not. Corruption behavior is one of the contexts of social dilemmas. Someone who commits corruption means he/she shows non-cooperative behavior. It is hypothesized that someone who commits corruption is a self-type social values orientation because he/she prioritizes personal interests and is not cooperative. This study aims to explore how social value orientation types on corruption prisoners. Data collection in this study used a questionnaire distributed to participants and interview. The study found that not all corruptors are proself types and focused on personal interest. Individuals of prosocial types who focus on common interests can also commit corruption. Corruption perpetrators believe that anyone who is in their position will commit corruption. There is another psychological aspect that can encourage someone to commit corruption.

scholarly journals Trust and mindreading in adolescents: the moderating role of social value orientation

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Derks ◽  
Manon A. Van Scheppingen ◽  
Nikki C. Lee ◽  
Lydia Krabbendam
Keyword(s):  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Moderating Role
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document