scholarly journals Relapse risk factors during allogeneic stem cell transplantation in children, adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-384
Author(s):  
D. V. Prudnikau ◽  
N. P. Kirsanava ◽  
Yu. E. Mareika ◽  
N. V. Minakovskaya ◽  
O. V. Aleinikova
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Disease Relapse ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Hsc Transplantation

More than 20–25 % of patients with acute leukemia underwent transplantation of HSC from HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor had relapse.Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different factors on the risk of post-transplantation relapse in children and teenagers with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).The gender, the age of a donor at the time of transplantation; the gender, the age of a recipient at the time of transplantation; the type, the number of relapses of previous HSCTs; the type of conditioning; the type of transplantation; the source of stem cells; transplant parameters; the acute (aGVHD) and chronic (cGVHD) graft-versus-host disease or its absence; the KIRalloreactivity of donor NK cells were estimated as risk factors for the disease relapse in our study.We established that the recipient’s age of less than 4 years at the time of transplantation (p = 0.0042); the time of relapse (very early and early) (p = 0.0047); the absence of aGVHD (p = 0.0183) or cGVHD (p = 0.0384) have been the important factors for the disease relapse of patients with ALL after allogeneic HSC transplantation.

Outcome of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Third Complete Remission (CR3): A Vital Role for Graft-Versus-Host-Disease/Graft-Versus-Leukemia Effect in Survival.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3667-3667
Author(s):  
Adam Gassas ◽  
Kashif Ishaqi ◽  
John Doyle
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Related Mortality

Abstract Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who suffer 2 relapses could be salvaged by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) when a suitable stem cell source is available provided they respond to the pre HSCT chemotherapy and at least enter morphological remission. However, these patients are at very high risk for post HSCT relapse and also at a high risk for transplant related mortality (TRM). Our objective, herein, was to review the outcome of children (0–18years) with ALL who received allogeneic HSCT in third complete remission (CR3) at our institution. Between January 1994 – August 2005, twenty-two consecutive children in CR3 received HSCT in the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. Conditioning regimens included single dose of VP16 (60mg/kg infused over 4 hours) and fractionated total body irradiation (TBI; 1200cGy) in six fractions over 3 days (VP16/TBI) in 10 patients (1994–1998) and cyclophosphamide 50mg/kg infused over 1 hour daily for 4 days followed by the same dose of fractionated TBI (CY/TBI) in 12 patients (1999–2005). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included cyclosporine A and a short course of methotrexate for the majority of patients, and all patients were in complete morphological remission prior to HSCT. Median age was 8.4 years (range 3–15.4). Donor source was as follows: matched sibling donor (MSD), 8; matched unrelated donor (MUD) 6; one antigen mismatch related donor (MMRD) 4; one antigen mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) 3; and one patient received 1 antigen mismatched cord progenitor stem cells. White cell engraftment was successful in all patients at a median of 18 days (range 9–29). Ten patients died of TRM, seven relapsed, one died from other causes and four patients are long term survivors at a median follow up of 3.7 years (range 1–10.2). All patients who did not develop clinical acute or chronic GVHD relapsed and died. Event free survival was (EFS 19% ± 4%). Three out of the 4 survivors received MMUD and all 4 survivors had moderate to severe acute GVHD and three had chronic GVHD, limited in two and extensive in one. Conclusion: Children with ALL in CR3 receiving HSCT are extremely high risk for relapse and transplant related mortality. These children have already relapsed twice and demonstrated chemotherapy resistance and GVL/GVHD plays a key role in leukemia eradication. Although, TRM is high in such patients and GVHD could potentially increase TRM, there are no survivors without GVHD and exploring means of inducing GVHD by reduction of immunosuppressive medications or other means of immunotherapy should seriously be considered in these patients.

scholarly journals Very Small Embryonic-Like Stem Cells, Endothelial Progenitor Cells, and Different Monocyte Subsets Are Effectively Mobilized in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients after G-CSF Treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Eljaszewicz ◽  
Lukasz Bolkun ◽  
Kamil Grubczak ◽  
Malgorzata Rusak ◽  
Tomasz Wasiluk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Endothelial Progenitor Cells ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Monocyte Subsets ◽  
Endothelial Progenitor ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Background. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a malignant disease of lymphoid progenitor cells. ALL chemotherapy is associated with numerous side effects including neutropenia that is routinely prevented by the administration of growth factors such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). To date, the effects of G-CSF treatment on the level of mobilization of different stem and progenitor cells in ALL patients subjected to clinically effective chemotherapy have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, in this study we aimed to assess the effect of administration of G-CSF to ALL patients on mobilization of other than hematopoietic stem cell (HSCs) subsets, namely, very small embryonic-like stem cells (VSELs), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), and different monocyte subsets. Methods. We used multicolor flow cytometry to quantitate numbers of CD34+ cells, hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), VSELs, EPCs, and different monocyte subsets in the peripheral blood of ALL patients and normal age-matched blood donors. Results. We showed that ALL patients following chemotherapy, when compared to healthy donors, presented with significantly lower numbers of CD34+ cells, HSCs, VSELs, and CD14+ monocytes, but not EPCs. Moreover, we found that G-CSF administration induced effective mobilization of all the abovementioned progenitor and stem cell subsets with high regenerative and proangiogenic potential. Conclusion. These findings contribute to better understanding the beneficial clinical effect of G-CSF administration in ALL patients following successful chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Single step multiple genotyping by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, for evaluation of minor histocompatibility antigens in patients submitted to allogeneic stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched related and unrelated donor

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Cattina ◽  
Simona Bernardi ◽  
Vilma Mantovani ◽  
Eleonora Toffoletti ◽  
Alessandra Santoro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Sibling Pairs ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Maldi Tof ◽  
Increased Risk

The outcome of patients underwent to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo- SCT) is closely related to graft versus host disease (GvHD) and graft versus leukemia (GvL) effects which can be mediated by mHAgs. 23 mHAgs have been identified and reported to be differently correlated with GVHD or GVL and the aim of this work was develop a method to genotype the mHAgs described so far. For this study we used MALDI-TOF iPLEX Gold Mass Array technology. We tested 46 donor/recipient matched pairs that underwent allo-SCT because of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (n=29) or Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=17). Our data show that sibling pairs had a lesser number of mHAgs mismatches compared to MUD pairs. Notably, donor/recipient genomic mismatch on DPH1 was correlated with an increased risk of acute GvHD and LB-ADIR-1R mismatch on graft versus host direction was correlated with a better RFS with no increase of GvHD risk. Our work provides a simple, accurate and highly automatable method for mHAgs genotyping and suggest the role of mHAgs in addressing the immune reaction between donor and host.

CD34 Expression in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Is a Favorable Prognostic Factor in Patients Treated with Stem Cell Transplant in First Remission,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4091-4091
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Aljurf ◽  
Naeem A. Chaudhri ◽  
Fahed Almhareb ◽  
Claudia Ulrike Walter ◽  
Randa Nounou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Prognostic Relevance ◽  
First Remission ◽  
Cd34 Expression

Abstract Abstract 4091 Background: CD34 is a member of the trans-membrane sialomucin proteins expressed on the surface of hematopoietic cells and plays an important role as a cell-cell adhesion factor and mediates attachment of stem cells to extracellular matrix. Clinically, CD34 and other surface markers, such as CD13 and CD33, are frequently used as differentiation markers: CD34 for stem cells and CD13 and CD33 for myeloid differentiation. CD34 is not expressed on the surface of leukemic cells in a significant number of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). CD13 and CD33 are expressed on the surface of lymphoblasts in few ALL patients. The clinical significance of CD13 and CD33 expression on the surface of lymphoblasts in ALL has been studied extensively in patients treated with conventional chemotherapy. The clinical relevance of the expression of CD34, CD13 and CD33 on outcome in ALL patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is not known. We studied the prognostic relevance of the expression of CD34, CD13, and CD33 on outcome of adult ALL patients when treated with allogeneic HSCT, either in the first remission or after relapsing and correlated the expression with outcome. Methods: Data collected from immunophenotyping of 62 patients with ALL who were treated with HSCT was reviewed and the expression of the CD34, CD13, and CD33 on the blast population as determined using flow cytometry was correlated with clinical behavior and outcome. Thirty-eight (61%) of these patients were treated with HSCT in first remission (CR1), while the rest of the patients were transplanted in the second or third remission. The median age of these patients was 19 (range: 14–43) and included 17 females (27%) and 45 males (73%). Cytogenetics at diagnosis classified the patients as intermediate in 24 cases (39%), adverse in 31 (50%), and favorable in 5 (8%). Cytogenetic data was not available on two patients. Results: Twenty-four (39%) of all patients did not express CD34 on the surface of the blasts at diagnosis, while 13 (21%) patients expressed CD13 and 19 (31%) expressed CD33. ALL patients who did not express CD34 had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (P=0.003) and event free survival (EFS) (P=0.009). However, when only patients who were treated with HSCT in CR2 or CR3 were considered, CD34 expression was not relevant for OS or for EFS. Patients treated with HSCT in CR1 had significantly better OS (P=0.00) and EFS (P=0.00) if they expressed CD34. In contrast, expression of CD13 or CD33 had no impact on OS or EFS. Conclusion: Our data suggests that CD34 expression, and not CD13 or CD33, has a favorable impact on overall survival as well as EFS in adult ALL patients being treated with HSCT in CR1, however it loses its prognostic relevance in patients transplanted in more advanced disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Predictive Factors and Outcomes after Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Brazil

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2926-2926
Author(s):  
Wellington F Silva ◽  
Dalila Cysne ◽  
Mariana Nassif Kerbauy ◽  
Iago Colturato ◽  
Ana Carolina Arrais Maia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Donor Age ◽  
Center Effect

Abstract Introduction: Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) remains a potentially curative approach for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially for high-risk patients and those with relapsed/refractory disease, although its efficacy is offset by a not negligible toxicity. Adult patients with ALL fare worse in developing countries with low data about the HSCT in this setting. In this study, we aim to describe outcomes and examine risk factors for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after HSCT for ALL in Brazilian centers. Methods: This is a retrospective registry study. Patients with ALL or ambiguous lineage leukemia above 16 years who underwent a first HSCT in 5 Brazilian centers between January 2007 and December 2017 were included. Kaplan-Meier method and competing risk analysis were used. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed using Cox regression and the Akaike's information criteria was used for model selection. Cut-offs for continuous variables were calculated through "findcut" R function. Center effect was evaluated by using frailty model. Results: Overall, 275 patients were included with a median age of 31y (range, 16-65). Philadelphia chromosome was found in 35%. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Matched sibling donor (MSD), matched unrelated donor (MUD), mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD), haploidentical donor and umbilical cord were reported in 53%, 19%, 9%, 19%, and 5%, respectively. Total body irradiation (TBI) was used in 67% of myeloablative HSCT. Median time to HSCT in CR1 was 7.8 months. Engraftment failure rate was 1.5%. Median follow-up time was 6.4 y. Cumulative incidence of acute grade II-IV and chronic GVHD were 54.2% and 26.2%, respectively. In MVA, the use of MUD (HR=2.3) and increased donor age (HR=1.02) were associated with GVHD. Five-year CIR was 28.1% (95% CI 22.9-33.6) and 5-y NRM was 34.1% (95% CI 28.4-39.8). At D+100, NRM incidence was 22.6%. Central nervous system involvement at the diagnosis (HR=2.2), and disease status (HR 1.8 for CR2+, and HR 7.9 for refractory) increased relapse incidence, whereas the use of peripheral blood graft (HR=0.51) and haploidentical donor (HR=0.4) significantly decreased relapse incidence. In MVA, NRM was increased by patient's age (HR=1.04), refractory status (HR=4.2), MUD (HR=3.8) and donor age (HR=1.02). Center effect was significantly associated with relapse and NRM. Five-year OS and DFS were 40.7% (95% CI 35.1-47.1) and 37.8% (95% CI-32.3-44.1), respectively (Figure 1). Patient's age, donor age and disease status were independently associated with OS and DFS (Table 2). When GVHD (as a time-dependent variable) was introduced in the MVA for OS and DFS, it was associated with decreased OS (HR 4.2, p<0.001) but not with DFS. Pre-HSCT positivity of minimal residual disease (>0.01%) was associated with worse DFS in univariate analysis (HR=1.47) in available cases. Conclusions: This is the largest series of ALL adults receiving HSCT from Brazil. While OS and DFS were similar to published data, NRM was higher. Patient's age and donor age outweighed donor type or graft source in our analysis. Interestingly, haploidentical HSCT related to lower CIR, whereas the use of MUD was associated with higher NRM and GVHD rates. These results impact on donor selection strategy in our country, aiming to timely offer HSCT for high-risk ALL patients in our setting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation from Unmanipulated Haploidentical Donors Versus Matched or Mismatched 9/10 Unrelated Donors in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Complete Remission: On Behalf of the ALWP of the EBMT

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2174-2174
Author(s):  
Noga Shem-Tov ◽  
Christophe Peczynski ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Maija Itälä-Remes ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Matched Sibling ◽  
First Complete Remission

Abstract Background: Unmanipulated T-cell replete haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation has become an attractive alternative choice for patients with no HLA matched sibling or unrelated donors. However data of outcome in patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is still scarce. The Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) conducted this study to compare the outcome of allogeneic transplantation (Allo-SCT) from haploidentical donor (Haplo) versus matched (MUD 10/10) or mismatched (MMUD 9/10) unrelated donor for patients with ALL in first Complete Remission (CR1). Methods: The outcomes of 1,234 adult patients with Philadelphia positive or negative (Ph+ / Ph-) B ALL or T ALL in CR1 who underwent Allo-SCT between 2007 and 2016 were analyzed. Comparison was made between Haplo (136 patients), MUD 10/10 (809 patients) and MMUD 9/10 (289 patients). Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional-hazard model. To control potential confounding factors between treatments that could influence outcome, propensity score matching was also performed between Haplo and the 2 other groups. Results: Main population characteristics are depicted in Table 1. Recipients of Haplo, MUD 10/10 and MMUD 9/10 were comparable concerning median age, time from diagnosis to Allo-SCT and myeloablative versus reduced intensity conditioning (MAC/RIC). However, Haplo transplants cohort differed in several characteristics from the MUD and MMUD patients groups. The percentage of female donors was higher in Haplo transplants and female to male mismatch was higher accordingly, CMV matched negative status was lower in Haplo. The source of stem cells was bone marrow (BM) versus peripheral blood (PB) stem cells in significantly higher percentage of Haplo transplants (53.7% vs 15.1% and 16.6% for MUD and MMUD respectively, p<0.0001). Most Haplo patients received post-transplant cyclophosphamide for graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (77%) while this regimen was rarely used in the other groups (about 3%, p=0.0005). Univariate analysis showed similar results in Haplo, MUD and MMUD. Disease free survival (DFS) at 3 years was 49±11%, 53±4% and 55±7%, respectively (p=0.67) (Figure 1). Overall survival (OS) was 54±11%, 62±4% and 62±6%, respectively (p=0.11) (Figure 2). Relapse incidence (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 3 years were not different either, RI was 28±9%, 28±4% and 25±6%, respectively (p=0.7) and NRM was 23±8%, 19±3% and 20±6%, respectively (p=0.6). Acute GVHD (AGVHD), either grade II-IV or grade III-IV and chronic GVHD (CGVHD) did not differ between the 3 groups (p=0.1, p=1.0 and p=0.6 respectively). The GVHD-relapse free survival (GRFS) was also not statistically different between the groups, 43±10%, 43±4% and 46±7%, respectively (p=0.7). After adjustment for center effect, patient age, donor/patient gender, donor and patient CMV serostatus, ALL type (B Ph- vs B Ph+ vs T), time from diagnosis to SCT, type of conditioning and cell source (PB vs BM), the multivariate Cox model showed that Haplo recipients did not experience worse outcomes compared to MUD 10/10 and MMUD 9/10. Indeed, compared to Haplo, the Hazard Ratio (HR) for DFS was 1.1 for MUD (p=0.7) and 1.1 for MMUD (p=0.8). The HR for OS in MUD and MMUD did not differ from Haplo either (HR=0.9, p=0.4 and HR=1.0, p=1.0 respectively). Moreover, compared to Haplo, SCT from MUD and MMUD were not associated with lower hazards for RI (HR=0.9, p=0.8 and HR=0.7, p=0.2 respectively), NRM (HR=0.7, p=0.2 and HR=0.8, p=0.4 respectively), AGVHD II-IV (HR=1.1, p=0.8 and HR=1.2, p=0.3 respectively) and CGVHD (HR=0.8, p=0.2 and HR=0.9, p=0.6 respectively). Propensity matching confirmed the results of the multivariate Cox analysis with no difference in outcome between Haplo, MUD and MMUD. Compared to Haplo the HR for DFS and OS were 1.04 (p=0.84) and 0.85 (p=0.50) for MUD and 0.9 (p=0.66) and 0.82 (p=0.48) for MMUD. Conclusions: Outcomes of adult patients with ALL in CR1 receiving Haplo Allo-SCT are comparable to MUD or MMUD transplants. Haplo should be considered as an additional option for patients lacking a matched sibling donor. Disclosures Tischer: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Jazz Advisory Board. Mohty:MaaT Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Inhibitory Effects of Homoharringtonine on Leukemic Stem Cells and BCR-ABL Induced Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Mice.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2912-2912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaoyu Chen ◽  
Yiguo Hu ◽  
Shawnya Michaels ◽  
Dennis Brown ◽  
Shaoguang Li
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Leukemia Cells ◽  
Leukemic Stem Cells ◽  
Lymphoid Leukemia

Abstract The Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) imatinib mesylate (IM) and dasatinib, targeting BCR-ABL for the treatment of Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) leukemia including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), have produced impressive results in terms of therapeutic outcome and safety for patients. However, clinical resistance to these TKIs likely at the level of leukemic stem cell negates curative results in Ph+ leukemia. At present, an anti-stem cell strategy has not been developed for treating these leukemia patients. Homoharringtonine (HHT) (omacetaxine mepesuccinate - USAN/INN designation) has shown significant clinical activity in CML in combination with IM or alone for patients failing IM. However, little is known about whether HHT has an inhibitory effect on leukemic stem cells. The purpose of this study is to determine whether HHT inhibits BCR-ABL-expressing leukemic stem cells (Lin-c-Kit+Sca-1+) that we identified previously (Hu et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(45):16870–16875, 2007) and to evaluate therapeutic effects of HHT on CML and B-ALL in mice. We find that in our in vitro stem cell assay, greater than 90% of leukemic stem cells were killed after being treating with HHT (12.5, 25, and 50 nM) for 6 days, and in contrast, greater than 75% or 92% of leukemic stem cells survived the treatment with dasatinib (100 nM) or imatinib (2 mM). We next treated CML mice with HHT (0.5 mg/kg, i.p., once a day). 4 days after the treatment, FACS analysis detected only 2% GFP+Gr–1+ myeloid leukemia cells in peripheral blood of HHT -treated CML mice and in contrast, 41% GFP+Gr–1+ myeloid leukemia cells in placebo-treated mice. We also treated mice with BCR-ABL induced B-ALL with HHT, and found that only 0.78% GFP+B220+ lymphoid leukemia cells were detected in peripheral blood compared to 34% GFP+B220+ lymphoid leukemia cells in placebo-treated mice. Furthermore, HHT significantly inhibited in vitro proliferation of K562 and B-lymphoid leukemic cells isolated from mice with B-ALL induced by BCR-ABL wild type and BCR-ABL-T315I resistant to both imatinib and dasatinib. In sum, HHT has an inhibitory activity against CML stem cells, and is highly effective in treating CML and B-ALL induced by BCR-ABL in mice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document