scholarly journals BANKING STOCK ABNORMAL RETURN ANALYSIS OF PRE AND POST MERGER AND ACQUISITION IN INDONESIA

JEMBATAN ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-24
Author(s):  
Rivanny Astricia ◽  
Isni Andriana ◽  
Reza Ghasarma

The number of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in Indonesia is growing because of government policy and also their usefulness as a corporate tool to pursue strategic growth and profit. This study aims to analyze the abnormal returns of banking industries pre and post-merger and acquisition in Indonesia. Using a sample of 7 M&A deals in Indonesia from 2018 to 2019, the event study methodology used in this study is Paired Sample T-Test to tell the difference between pre and post abnormal returns. The data that use for calculating is -30 until +30 of Merger and Acquisition. The result shows that from 7 mergers and acquisition there is only one bank that has a significant difference while the rest does not have a significant difference pre and post the event. This research hopefully can be used for further research, useful for investment practitioners.

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Suherman Suherman ◽  
Riznita Nuraisyah ◽  
Gatot N. Ahmad

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis perbedaan abnormal return dan likuiditas saham sebelum dan sesudah pengumuman akuisisi. Pengukuran abnormal return menggunakan market-adjusted model. Pengukuran likuiditas saham menggunakan volume perdagangan dan Amihud’s Illiquidity ratio. Periode pengamatan (event windows) penelitian ini selama 11 hari bursa, yaitu 5 hari bursa sebelum pengumuman akuisisi dan 5 hari bursa sesudah pengumuman akuisisi. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 70 perusahaan yang mengumumkan akuisisi antara 2010-2014. Hasil uji hipotesis menunjukkan bahwa 1)terjadi perbedaan abnormal return yang signifikan sebelum dan sesudah akuisisi, dan 2)tidak terdapat perbedaan likuiditas saham yang signifikan pada periode sebelum dan sesudah akuisisi.The purpose of this study is to analyze the difference of abnormal return and liquidity before and after the announcement of mergers and acquisitions. Abnormal returns are measured with market-adjusted model. Liquidity is measured with trading volume and Amihud Illiquidity ratio. The observation period (event windows) of this research is 11 trading days which 5 trading days before the announcement of the merger and acquisition and 5 trading days after the announcement mergers and acquisitions. Research sample consists of 70 companies which announce merger and acquisition between 2010 and 2014. The results show that 1)there is significant differences of abnormal returns before and after merger and acquisition, and 2)there is no significant differences of stock liquidity before and after merger and acquisition.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-22
Author(s):  
Sonny Haryanto ◽  
Umi Mardiyati ◽  
Agung Dharmawan Buchdadi

This study aims to analyze the abnormal returns before and after the announcement of mergers and acquisitions in the companies listed on the IDX 2018. In this study the observation period taken was three days before and after the announcement of mergers and acquisitions with the number of samples observed were 9 companies. The method for calculating abnormal returns used is the market adjusted return by using an intraday stock price of 15 minutes. Based on testing hypotheses conducted by paired sample t-test, it was found that there were no significant differences in abnormal returns before and after the announcement of mergers and acquisitions in each 15 minute period.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Patrick Maina Gachuhi ◽  
Cyrus Iraya

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of bonus issue on stock prices of companies quoted at the Nairobi securities exchangeMethodology: The study adopted an event study methodology since the study was concerned with the establishment of the information content of bonus issue announcement on share performance at the NSE. The population of this study was 61 companies listed in the NSE. A sample size of 10 listed companies was focused on as there were only 10 companies which had issued bonuses between 2009 and 2012. The study used secondary data to gather information. The collected secondary data was coded and entered into Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, Version 20) for analysisResults: The study findings revealed that there was a drastic incline from year 2009 to year 2010 followed by a slight decrease in abnormal returns in the following years, Abnormal returns present the difference between the actual returns and the expected returns over a certain period of time. Study findings from the market model indicated that the market return is a good predictor of stock returns.  ANOVA results indicated that abnormal returns after bonus issue were significantly higher than abnormal returns before bonus issue. ANOVA results also indicated that actual stock returns were significantly higher after bonus issue than before the bonus issuePolicy recommendation: The study recommends the NSE to establish and enhance policies for investing so as to attract and encourage large institutional and foreign investors to participate at the NSE. The study also recommends that policy makers and regulators at the NSE are encouraged to encourage more research on the NSE form of efficiency; this will provide a forum for investors to get the information on the form of efficiency of the market and boost their confidence when investing at the NSE


Academia Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wardah Azizah ◽  
Nurasik

This study aims to get a real picture of the Capital Market Reaction to the Corona Covid-19 Virus Outbreak (Study on LQ-45 Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange). The analytical tool used is descriptive statistical analysis and classical assumption test. To test the hypothesis, it is done using data analysis in the form of Paired Sample T-Test using the statistical program "Product and Service Solution" (SPSS). The results of hypothesis testing using paired sample t-test obtained t-value with a significant value of 0.000 (0.000 <0.05). From these results, it can be stated that the hypothesis is accepted, which means that there is a significant difference in abnormal returns before and after the Corona / Covid-19 Virus Outbreak. The difference in Abnormal Return on the test results has a positive value, this shows that if the Corona / Covid-19 Virus Outbreak has increased, the Abnormal Return value will increase.


TRIKONOMIKA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Alvin Mulya Hidayati

The research is aimed at finding out the stock prices before and after the disclosure of dividend distribution and the difference in abnormal return before and after the disclosure of dividend distribution. The research object is companies consistent in the Index Kompas-100 from February 2009 to January 2014. The type of this research is comparative descriptive. The sample used is 54 issuers obtained by conducting purposive sampling. The research periods are 31 days consisting of 15 days before the disclosure of dividend distribution, 1 day at the disclosure of dividend distribution, and 15 days after the disclosure of dividend distribution. This research uses market adjusted model to obtain the value of expected return. While paired sample t-test is used in hypothesis testing. The result of this research shows that there is no significant difference in stock prices as well as in average abnormal return between 15 days before the disclosure of dividend distribution and 15 days after the disclosure of dividend distribution.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 54-74
Author(s):  
Truong Nguyen Xuan

While numerous studies on spin-off have been done in the US and Europe, little efforts have been directed to research this area of cor-porate finance in Australia. This study investigates how market re-acts to corporate spin-offs in this country. We employ traditional event study methodology and find that market reacts strongly and positively to the announcements of spin-offs. Specifically, the cu-mulative average abnormal return over the 3-day event window is 3.58%. The cumulative average abnormal return for spin-offs by companies that increase their industrial focus is 4.12% and 3.33% for non-focused increasing spin-offs. Nevertheless, the difference between these two subgroups is statistically insignificant. Multivari-ate regressions provide evidence that high pre-leverage firms benefit more from spin-offs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pinky Mal ◽  

This study attempts to examine the stock behaviour of acquirer banks during pre and post-merger and acquisition (M&A) announcement period in the Indian banking sector. Data of M&A events that took place in the Indian banking sector during 2000-2018 was collected from the prowessdx database. The sample consisted of 31 merger and 351 acquisition announcements during 2000-2018 in the Indian Banking sector. Stock prices of sample banks were extracted from the NSE for an event window of -10 to +10 days and the event study methodology was used for analysis. The results suggest that shareholders of Indian acquirer banks generate small and insignificant abnormal returns from M&A deals. Return variability was also noticed from the curvy jumps in the average abnormal spread of returns during the announcement period. Whereas, the average abnormal change in liquidity witnessed a sharp hike on day 0 i.e. the date of deal announcement and it remained negative throughout the post-deal period. KEYWORDS: Mergers and Acquisitions, Stock Return, Stock Volatility, Stock Liquidity, Event Study Methodology.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Sylvi Liani Dewi ◽  
Indra Widjaja

This study aims to examine the difference in firm performances and abnormal returns before and after the merger and acquisition in the companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange in the year 2014 to 2018. The data observation period is 1 year before the merger dan acquisition and 2 years after merger and acquisition. The analysis technique used is the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for ratio performance and Paired Sample T-test for abnormal return. The results of the testing of the hypothesis show that period 1 year before M&A and comparison comparison 2 years after M&A shows there is no significant difference in company financial performance before and after merger and acquisition. Hypothesis for Abnormal return, there is no difference before and after merger and acquisition.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji perbedaan kinerja perusahaan dan abnormal return sebelum dan sesudah merger dan akuisisi pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek pada tahun 2014 hingga 2018. Periode observasi data adalah 1 tahun sebelum merger dan akuisisi dan 1& 2 tahun sesudah merger dan akuisisi. Metode analisa data yang digunakan adalah Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test dan Paired Sample T-Test untuk abnormal return. Hasil pengujian hipotesis menunjukkan bahwa periode 1 tahun sebelum M&A dan perbandingan 2 tahun setelah M&A menunjukkan tidak ada perbedaan signifikan dalam kinerja keuangan perusahaan sebelum dan sesudah merger dan akuisisi. Hipotesis untuk Abnormal return, tidak ada perbedaan sebelum dan sesudah merger dan akuisisi.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-17
Author(s):  
Sonny Haryanto ◽  
Umi Mardiyati ◽  
Agung Dharmawan Buchdadi

This study aims to analyze the abnormal returns before and after the announcement of mergers and acquisitions in the companies listed on the IDX 2018. In this study the observation period taken was three days before and after the announcement of mergers and acquisitions with the number of samples observed were 9 companies. The method for calculating abnormal returns used is the market adjusted return by using an intraday stock price of 15 minutes. Based on testing hypotheses conducted by paired sample t-test, it was found that there were no significant differences in abnormal returns before and after the announcement of mergers and acquisitions in each 15 minute period.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-60
Author(s):  
Eka Lavista

This study tests whether there are significant stock prices changes around the cum-dividend date. In particular, it examines the stock price movement of two days before and two days after the cum-dividend date. It uses an event study methodology. The population of this study are all companies in the LQ45 listed at Indonesia stock exchange for the year 2017 and the sample consists of 38 companies. Abnormal return is measured using the single index model. Results show that there are no significant abnormal returns around the cum-dividend date. In addition, there is no significant abnormal return difference between two days before and two days after the cum-dividend date. The implication of the reported findings is that investors may not obtain significant positive abnormal returns using a cum-dividend date as the trading strategy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document