Study on the Suspension of Execution Cases in Administrative Litigation Act

The Justice ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 187 ◽  
pp. 86-113
Author(s):  
Hyun kee Cheong
2004 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 75-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. O'Brien ◽  
Lianjiang Li

2011 ◽  
pp. 988-993
Author(s):  
Ruan Chuanshen

E-government has become a part of our society gradually as a derivative of the current information society. To adapt to international affairs, the country’s economic development and social progress, China should expedite the transfer from a traditional superintendent government to a modern service government by building an e-government. However, there are many obstacles in the way of popularizing e-government. The “validity” and “reliability” of e-governance are key problems, because China’s administrative legal system hasn’t made specific laws and regulations on e-governance administration. In the current situation, it is of great and practical importance to discuss the new characteristics of e-government administration and understand the influence of information on the administrative legal system.


2021 ◽  
pp. 44-46
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Sun

This chapter focuses on administrative procedure and judicial review in China. Despite its willingness to adapt to the rules of the global market, China does not accept the direct applicability of international standards in administrative litigation. Judicial review of administration is based on a set of legislative texts and judicial interpretations by the Supreme People's Court. Among these texts, the Administrative Litigation Law regulates the judicial review of administrative acts. There are two lists in its chapter concerning the scope of judicial review: one includes the administrative acts that are open to judicial review, another the acts that are not reviewable. In any case, it is up to the courts to examine the following two combinations of criteria: the degree of the seriousness of the infringement with the definition of the state interest and that of the public interest; and the degree of procedural breach with the definition of the real impact on the rights of the plaintiff. According to Article 76 of the ALL, in the case of annulment and/or declaration of unlawfulness of an administrative act, a court may order the administration to take measures to compensate the damage inflicted on the plaintiff.


1956 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-99
Author(s):  
Jésus Gonzalez Perez

Author(s):  
R. Chuanshen

E-government has become a part of our society gradually as a derivative of the current information society. To adapt to international affairs, the country’s economic development and social progress, China should expedite the transfer from a traditional superintendent government to a modern service government by building an e-government. However, there are many obstacles in the way of popularizing e-government. The “validity” and “reliability” of e-governance are key problems, because China’s administrative legal system hasn’t made specific laws and regulations on e-governance administration. In the current situation, it is of great and practical importance to discuss the new characteristics of e-government administration and understand the influence of information on the administrative legal system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document