scholarly journals LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 233-236
Author(s):  
NAVEED JABBAR ◽  
M. ZAFAR KHAN ◽  
AFTAB AHMED CH.
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendicectomy ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Cost Effective Method ◽  
Stump Closure ◽  
Appendiceal Stump ◽  
Appendicular Stump ◽  
Discharge From Hospital

Objective: An inadequate closure of the appendix stump leads to intra-abdominal surgical site infection. Many studies show that the use of costly high tech instruments such as Endo-loops, Endo-GIA for transaction and closure of the appendiceal stump lowers the risk of infection. The Aim of this study was to evaluate the use of clips for closure of appendix stump as a safe and cost-effective method. Study Design: Descriptive Study. Period: Oct 2009 to Jun 2010. Setting: Shalamar Hospital, Lahore. Materials and Methods: Over a period of 9 months 36 patients were selected to have laparoscopic appendicectomy. All patients had stump closure by clips as used for cystic duct and cystic artery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. No patient had Endo-loop or Endo-GIA for closure of stump. All patients had follow-up at one week and six weeks after discharge from hospital. Results: There was no clinical evidence of surgical site infection or leak from appendicular stump by this method. There was no discomfort in handling this instrument both for surgeon and scrub nurse. The price of the clips used was 4.30 Euros as compared to 112.00 and 232.77 Euros for the Endo-loops and Endo-GIA respectively. Conclusions: This study shows that clips can be used for stump closure without any additional risk to patient. It is also cost- effective. So appendiceal stump closure using clips is very convenient, an easy, safe, and cost-effective procedure.

scholarly journals Hospitalization time after open appendectomy by three different surgical techniques

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agláia Moreira Garcia XIMENES ◽  
Fernando Salvo Torres MELLO ◽  
Zailton Bezerra de LIMA-JÚNIOR ◽  
Cícero Faustino FERREIRA ◽  
Amanda Dantas Ferreira CAVALCANTI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Hospitalization Time ◽  
Contingency Coefficient ◽  
Appendicular Stump

BACKGROUND: The choice of surgical technique to approach the appendicular stump depends mostly on skill and personal preference of the surgeon or on the protocol used in the service, and the influence of this choice in hospitalization time is not evaluated. AIM: To evaluate the relation between surgical technique and postoperative hospitalization time in patients presenting with acute appendicitis. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 180 patients who underwent open appendectomy. These where divided into three groups according to surgical technique: conventional appendectomy (simple ligation of the stump), tobacco pouch suture and Parker-Kerr suture. Data where crossed with hospitalization time (until three days, from four to six days and over seven days). RESULTS: A hundred and eighty patients with age from 15 to 85 years where included. From these, 95 underwent conventional technique, had an average hospitalization time of 3,9 days and seven had complications (surgical site infection, seroma, suture dehiscence and evisceration). In 67 patients, tobacco pouch suture was chosen and had average hospitalization time of 3,7 days and two complications (infection and seroma). In 18 Parker-Kerr suture was made, with average hospitalization time of 2,6 days, with no complication. Contingency coefficient between the variables hospitalization time and technique was 0,255 and Cramér's V was 0,186. CONCLUSION: There was tendency to larger hospitalization time and larger number of complications in conventional appendectomy, whereas in patients where Parker-Kerr suture was performed, hospitalization time was significantly smaller.

scholarly journals Study of efficacy of short course peri-operative antibiotics in clean contaminated surgeries

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 2455
Author(s):  
Shivakumar C. R. ◽  
Mohammad Fazelul Rahman Shoeb ◽  
Anil Reddy Pinate
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Perioperative Antibiotics ◽  
Clean Contaminated ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Background: Surgical site infection is a one of the most common postoperative complication and causes significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. WHO described Hospital acquired infections as one of the major infectious diseases having huge economic impact. Perioperative antibiotics constitute the bulk of antimicrobial consumption in any hospital. We need to adapt the policies that decrease the incidence of postoperative wound infection.Methods: Patients undergoing elective surgeries for clean contaminated cases for various causes from 15th May 2014 to 15th June 2017 under Surgical 1st Unit of District hospital Gulbarga (Affiliated to Gulbarga Institute of Medical Sciences, Gulbarga) are included in our study. During this period, a total of 216 patients participated, of which 145 were males and 71 were females. Patients received two doses of perioperative antibiotics, first dose before surgery and second dose after surgery, 12 hours apart during this period.Results: In this study, surgical site infection rate is 2.3% in clean-contaminated surgeries.Conclusions: The findings indicate that a short course of perioperative antibiotics where in first dose is given 30 minutes to one hour before surgery and second dose is given 12 hours after surgery are sufficient and efficacious as infection rate is acceptable (1%-3%).Infection rate in our study was 2.3%. It is cost-effective as well for prevention of surgical site infections in clean-contaminated surgeries in Indian surgical setup.

scholarly journals Surgical site infection in Laparoscopic versus Open appendicectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-43
Author(s):  
Ashok Koirala ◽  
Dipendra Thakur ◽  
Sunit Agrawal ◽  
Bhuwan Lal Chaudhary ◽  
Sagar Poudel
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendicectomy ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Open Appendicectomy ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Mean

 Background: Acute appendicitis is very common surgical cause of acute abdomen and needs surgical removal either by laparoscopic or open appendicectomy. The aim of this study is to compare frequency of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Materials and Methods: The study was prospective study conducted in NMCTH, Biratnagar. Total 200 patients with diagnosis of acute appendicitis admitted through the emergency department of our hospital were included in the study. The patients were randomly allocated in two groups: Laparoscopic appendicectomy group (LA) and Open appendicectomy group (OA). Both groups underwent successful emergency appendicectomy. Wound infections in terms of surgical site infection (SSI) if present were recorded. All age groups and both sexes were included.  Results: Two hundred patients underwent appendicectomy, one hundred Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) and another hundred open appendicectomy (OA). The mean age of patients with acute appendicitis was 30.63±16.14 years with minimum of 6 years and maximum of 77 years. The highest number of patients were in age group of 10 to 20 years (29.5%). In LA group SSI noted in 3 patients (3%) whereas in OA group it was found in 12 patients (12%). Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendicectomy is better and offers great advantages in terms of SSI as compared to Open appendicectomy.  

scholarly journals Handmade endoloop knotting technique without knot pusher for appendicular stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy: an experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 3804
Author(s):  
Akhilesh Kumar Yadav ◽  
Sankalp Dwivedi ◽  
Rahul Ranjan ◽  
Naveen Yadav
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Surgical Team ◽  
Bipolar Cautery ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Procedure Cost ◽  
Stump Closure ◽  
Appendicular Stump ◽  
Knot Pusher ◽  
Appendicular Stump Closure

Background: The objective of the study was to devise a handmade endoloop knotting technique without the use of knot pusher thereby reducing the overall cost of laparoscopic appendectomy.Methods: This prospective study was conducted in MMIMSR Ambala from September 2016 to August 2018. All operations were performed by the same surgical team. Mesoappendix was coagulated with bipolar cautery and cut with scissors. Two handmade Meltzer loops were placed on base of appendix and tightened using conventional graspers.Results: Around 50 patients were included in the study. The time spent for preparing and tying one loop was approximately 20-25 seconds. None of the patients had leakage from the appendicular stump. Only one polyglactin suture was used to make three loops. Knot pusher was not used in any of the patients.Conclusions: Handmade endoloop used in this prospective study for securing appendicular stump using conventional laparoscopic graspers was found to be equally safe and can be easily mastered by any laparoscopic surgeon, which will reduce his dependency upon preformed endoloops making the procedure cost effective.

scholarly journals Comparative study of single dose preoperative antibiotics versus both preoperative and postoperative antibiotics in laparoscopic appendicectomy for nonperforated appendicitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 3092
Author(s):  
Himabindu Bangaru ◽  
Varun V. Gaiki ◽  
M. V. Ranga Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Prophylactic Antibiotics ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendicectomy ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Preoperative Antibiotics

Background: Antibiotics are being administered both preoperatively and postoperatively even in uncomplicated nonperforated appendicitis. Studies regarding role of postoperative antibiotics in laparoscopic appendicectomy for nonperforated appendicitis are sparse. The aim of the study is therefore to study the efficacy of single dose preoperative antibiotics versus both preoperative and postoperative antibiotics in reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic appendicectomy for uncomplicated nonperforated acute appendicitis.Methods: This is a prospective study done in general surgery department at Malla Reddy institute of medical sciences from September to April 2016.162 patients with nonperforated appendicitis were randomly allocated into two groups. 80 patients in Group A were given single dose of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics. No further antibiotics were given. 82 patients in Group B were given both preoperative and postoperative antibiotics. Postoperative surgical site infection and duration of postoperative hospital stay were compared between both groups. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA, Fisher’s Exact test and Chi-square test wherever necessary.Results: There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection in both groups. The mean duration of postoperative hospital stay was shorter in preoperative antibiotics only group (Group A). Age and gender had no significant association with surgical site infection. There was no deep incisional or organ space infection in this study.Conclusions: Single dose prophylactic antibiotics would be sufficient in cases of laparoscopic appendicectomy for simple uncomplicated nonperforated acute appendicitis. Postoperative antibiotic administration would not be necessary in these cases.

High-tech or field techs: Radio-telemetry is a cost-effective method for reducing bias in songbird nest searching

The Condor ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M. Peterson ◽  
Henry M. Streby ◽  
Justin A. Lehman ◽  
Gunnar R. Kramer ◽  
Alex C. Fish ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radio Telemetry ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Cost Effective Method ◽  
Nest Searching

scholarly journals A study to evaluate the safety and cost effectiveness of preformed catgut endoloops and polyglactin 910 extracorporeal ligation in the management of appendicular stump closure in laparoscopic appendicectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 813
Author(s):  
Khamar J. Banu ◽  
Austin Titus
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Polyglactin 910 ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Stump Closure ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Cost Effective Technique ◽  
Appendicular Stump

Background: The most essential component of laparoscopic appendectomy is the closure of appendicular stump. Failure of which can result in catastrophic complications including intra-abdominal and surgical site infections and rarely faecal fistula. The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness of preformed catgut endoloop and extracorporeal polyglactin 910 for appendicular stump closure.Methods: This prospective study was carried out in 64 patients. We compared patient demographics, duration of surgery, intra and post-operative complications, hospital stay and cost of surgery between the two groups.Results: A total of sixty-four patients were finally included in the analysis, catgut group (n=34), polyglactin 910 group (n=30). The demographics between the two groups were similar. The mean age in catgut group was 23.94 years and polyglactin 910 groups was 23.33 years. Mean duration of surgery was 41.6 and 41.8 minutes in catgut and endoloop group respectively. Mean hospital stay was 3 days. There was no mortality but complications were seen in 6 patients. However, there was no statistical significance in between the two groups with any of the parameters studied.Conclusions: Multiple studies have demonstrated safety and effectiveness of various techniques of appendicular stump. The use of extracorporeal single polyglactin 910 extracorporeal suture knot is safe and cost-effective technique for closure of appendicular stump in rural and resource poor regions.

scholarly journals A comparative study on surgical site infection in cases of open and laparoscopic appendicectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 3309
Author(s):  
Priyansh Pandey ◽  
Manish M. Swarnkar ◽  
S. C. Jain
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Blood Cell ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
White Blood Cell ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendicectomy ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Site Infection

Background: Diagnosis of acute appendicitis is mostly based on clinical features pointing towards appendicitis. Several biochemical parameters, such as the white blood cell (WBC) count, and neutrophil percentage, are currently used to aid clinical diagnosis.  Without immediate surgery, appendicitis may progress to perforation of the appendix. This study was carried out to determine rate of SSI in open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy for acute appendicitis and to identify independent risk factors for SSI.Methods: Appendicitis is a common cause of pain in right iliac fossa worldwide. The present study was carried out in the Department of General Surgery, Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi, Wardha, from August 2015 to July 2017. This study was conducted after the due clearance from Institutional Ethical committee. Total 132 patients admitted to the surgery ward with acute lower abdominal pain with clinical features of acute appendicitis on clinical examination, were studied prospectively.Results: In the present study, maximum patients were seen in less than 20 years of age and next commonest age group of presentation was 21-30 years. The male to female sex ratio was 1:1.3 in the laparoscopic appendectomy group while in the open appendectomy group was 1.81:1. The incidence of complicated intra-operative findings and mean white blood cell count was more in the open appendectomy group. The mean operative time, days for use of analgesics, time taken to return to soft diet and length of hospital stay for laparoscopic appendectomy group was less than the open appendectomy group. There were more cases of surgical site infection in the patients operated by open approach than laparoscopic approach.Conclusions: Wound class II versus III and NNIS index were found to be significantly associated with surgical site infection.

117 A Systematic Review Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Hem-O-Lok Clips and Endoloops In Securing the Base of The Appendix During Laparoscopic Appendicectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Khawaja ◽  
Magee Conor ◽  
Jeremy Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendicectomy ◽  
Intracorporeal Suturing ◽  
Stump Closure ◽  
Postoperative Length ◽  
Time Of Operation

Abstract Introduction One of the crucial steps of laparoscopic appendicectomy is to secure the base of appendix. A variety of techniques for stump closure have been described as Endoloops(Vicryl or PDS), Hem-o-lok clips, intracorporeal suturing and endoscopic staplers. Method A detailed literature survey using Pubmed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was carried out to extract studies conducted between 1990 and 2020. A total of 14 studies- 3 randomized controlled trials & 11 comparative studies enrolling 2098 (1030 in HL & 1068 in EL group) patients were included in the final analysis comparing Hem-o-lok versus endoloops for closure of appendiceal base. Outcome measures were Operative time, Cost benefit, Post-operative complications, and length of hospital stay. Results The average time of operation was significantly shorter in the HL group (SMD -0.79; 95% CI -1.03 – 0.56; z = 6.61; p < 0.00001). HL was found to be more cost-effective. (SMD -5.00; 95% CI-7.00 – 3.00; z = 4.90; p < 0.00001). However, no statistical difference was found between both the groups when comparing mean postoperative length of hospital stay & post-operative. Conclusions Based on the results of the above study, applying Hem-o-lok clips seems to be a safe, effacious and cost-effective way of securing the base of appendix.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document