scholarly journals ANAL FISSURE;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (09) ◽  
pp. 1354-1359
Author(s):  
Syeda Tooba Bukhari ◽  
Sheikh Atiq-ur- Rehman ◽  
Muhammad Shoaib Abdullah ◽  
Syed Talha Bukhari ◽  
Javid Iqbal
Keyword(s):  
Glyceryl Trinitrate ◽  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Pain Response ◽  
Surgical Units ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Group B ◽  
Glyceryl Trinitrate Ointment ◽  
Mean Time

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of 2% Diltiazem ointment with 0.2%Glyceryl trinitrate ointment. Place & period: The study was conducted in surgical units,Bahawal Vicotria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan from 01-01-2016 to 31-12-2016. Material &Method: In this prospective comparative study, 160 patients with anal fissure were equally&randomly divided in two group A (received 2%diltiazem ointment) & group B (received 0.2%Glyceryl trinitrate ointment). The ointment had to be applied to anal verge twice daily for 6-8weeks. Assessment was done at 2nd, 4th & 6th weekends for fissure healing, pain relief & sideeffects. Results: Complete fissure healing was observed in 80%of patients in group A & 70% ingroup B (P<0.15). Pain response was good & was fairly similar in both the groups. Headacheoccurred in 5% in group A & 20% in group B (P<0.002). Mean time taken for healing of fissurein group A was 5.5±0.28 weeks & in group B was 5.8±0.32 weeks (P< 0.237). Recurrence ratewas 7.5% in group A & 17.5% in group B. Conclusion: Topical Diltiazem is preferred to topicalGlyceryl trinitrate in the treatment of acute & chronic fissure, because it is associated with a fewside effects.

scholarly journals Comparing the Efficacy of 2% Diltiazem Gel with 0.2% Glyceryl Trinitrate in Anal Fissure

2021 ◽  
pp. 397-401
Author(s):  
Ehsanullah Malik ◽  
Sania Bhatti ◽  
Qararo Shah ◽  
Muharram Ali Abbasi ◽  
Khushbakhat Abro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glyceryl Trinitrate ◽  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Group B ◽  
Better Than

Objective: To compare the efficacy of 2% diltiazem gel with 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate in patients presenting with chronic anal fissure at Tertiary Care Hospital, Larkana. Methodology: This prospective comparative Study was conducted at department of Surgery ward-II Chandka Medical Hospital, Larkana from 14-01-19 to 14-07-19. A total of 130 patients who were treated as OPD cases were included in this study. Each patient detailed history & clinical examination, details of symptomatology was recorded in a epically diagnosed proforma. These patients were randomly divided in two equal groups i-e group A 65 patients and group B 65 patients. Group A patients were treated with 02% glyceryl trinitrate and group B patients were treated with diltiazem gel 02%. All the patients of group A & B were followed up to 02 months after start of leadema as a OPD cases. Results: A total of 130 patients (65 each in 2% diltiazem gel with 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate group) were included. Mean age in both groups was 42.56±3.91 and 41.71±4.01. 46 (70.8%) and 19 (29.2%) were male and female in Group A and 39 (60%) and 26 (40%) were male and female in Group B. Efficacy of 2% diltiazem gel with 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate in patients presenting with chronic anal fissure was 76.9% and 50.8% respectively. Conclusion: DTZ (2%) and GTN (0.2%) are equally effective in healing anal fissures. DTZ is better than GTN as it causes less side effects, low recurrence rate, healing rate and therefore better compliance.

scholarly journals Comparison of efficacy of internal sphincterotomy versus topical 0.2 % glyceryl trinitrate ointment after hemorrhoidectomy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 2541-2547
Author(s):  
Muhammad Arif ◽  
Sabih Nofal ◽  
Ahsan Khan ◽  
Mariam Tariq Awana ◽  
Anum Arif
Keyword(s):  
Glyceryl Trinitrate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Male Predominance ◽  
Internal Sphincterotomy ◽  
Open Hemorrhoidectomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Glyceryl Trinitrate Ointment

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate ointment versus internal sphincterotomy after hemorrhoidectomy. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of Surgery Unit III, at Lahore General Hospital, Lahore. Period: 6 months (August 2017 to February 2018). Material & Methods: The OPD of the Department of Surgery included 124 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria. There were two groups of patients, Group A and Group B. Group-A was told to use gloved finger three times daily for 0.2 percent GTN ointment topically. For Group B, lateral internal sphincterotomy was performed as day care procedure. On visit, patients were assessed for pain relief by using VAS. All data was collected using a pre-designed (attached) proforma. In SPSS v23.0 the data were input and analyzed. It was stratified for age, sex, disease duration and hemorrhoid stage. The effectiveness of both groups was compared by using a p-value of 0.05 as significant for a chi-square test. Results: Male predominance; in group-A, 41(66.1%) patients were male and 21(33.9%) were female, while in group-B, 52(83.9%) patients were male and 10(16.1%) were females. Efficacy was found in 11(17.7%) patients in group-A (0.2% GTN) while in 25(40.3%) patients in group-B (Internal sphincterotomy) with p-value of 0.006 which is statistically significant. Conclusion: Open hemorrhoidectomy internal sphincterotomy is an effective method to reduce pain after hemorrhoidectomy in contrast to Glyceryl Trinitrate (GTN) topical cream of 0.2 percent.

scholarly journals Comparative study of closed versus open lateral internal sphincterotomy in the management of chronic anal fissure

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1158
Author(s):  
Anand R. Bansal ◽  
Manish Bansal ◽  
Ankit Bhardwaj
Keyword(s):  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Dentate Line ◽  
Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy ◽  
Internal Sphincterotomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Delayed Healing ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Anal fissure is a painful tear in distal anal canal extending from just below the dentate line to anal verge. Patient presents with pain during or after defecation and passage of bright red blood per anus. Various studies investigating chronic anal fissures show a large variation in healing rates for different modalities. The present study was carried out to evaluate effectiveness of closed versus open lateral internal sphincterotomy in treatment of patients with chronic anal fissure.Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak. Group A and group B included 20 patients each with chronic anal fissure and managed by closed and open lateral internal sphincterotomy respectively and effectiveness was evaluated with regards to fissure healing, pain reduction, recurrence and incontinence after surgical treatment.Results: The mean pain scores on visual analogue scale at end of 1 week in group A and group B was not found to be statistically significant, whereas it was found to be statistically significant at 3 week and at 6 weeks. Delayed healing was seen in 1 patient of group B, whereas no patient in group A had delayed healing or absence of healing postoperatively.Conclusions:There was a significant difference between closed and open methods of lateral internal sphincterotomy in terms of relief in post-operative pain but as a whole both techniques did not show any statistically significant difference in terms of fissure healing, postoperative complications or recurrence at 3 months.  

scholarly journals Topical diltiazem versus topical glyceryl trinitrate in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a prospective comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1127
Author(s):  
Venkatesh S. ◽  
Srinivas B. Kulkarni ◽  
Kruthi S. R.
Keyword(s):  
Glyceryl Trinitrate ◽  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Complete Healing ◽  
P Value ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Chemical Sphincterotomy ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Topical Glyceryl Trinitrate

Background: Acute anal fissure (AAF) heals spontaneously with conservative line of treatment. Chronic anal fissure (CAF) needs either traditional surgical lateral sphicterotomy or chemical sphincterotomy with topical agents. The present study aims at the effectiveness of topical diltiazem (DTZ) cream over topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) ointment in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.Methods: A total of 100 patients with CAF were included in this comparative prospective study conducted in Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital Bengaluru from July 2017 to December 2018. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups of 50 patients each and were advised to apply 2% DTZ cream or 0.2% GTN ointment by fingertip to the anal verge twice daily for 8 weeks. The results were analysed and compared on two weekly intervals to know the effectiveness of treatment. P value of <0.05 is considered to be significant.Results: Complete healing of the fissure occurred in 80% of the patients in DTZ group against 76% in the GTN group by the end of 6 weeks (p>0.05, statistically not significant). Mild headache was experienced by 14% of the patients in the DTZ group, while 46% of the cases in the GTN group reported about the same (p<0.05 statistically significant).Conclusions: Topical 2% DTZ appeared to be well tolerated and effective preferred first-line method of chemical sphincterotomy with less side effects for chronic anal fissure.

scholarly journals Topical Lignocaine with Diltiazem or Glyceryltrinitrate for Paediatric Acute Anal Fissure: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 70-75
Author(s):  
Mukhtiar Ahmed ◽  
Jamil Akhter Munir Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Ali Sheikh ◽  
Tariq Latif ◽  
Abdul Qayyum
Keyword(s):  
Glyceryl Trinitrate ◽  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Symptomatic Relief ◽  
Paediatric Population ◽  
Paediatric Surgery ◽  
Exact Etiology ◽  
Group A ◽  
Bleeding Per Rectum ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Anal fissure is a common problem in children, the exact etiology of which is unknown and it mostly presents with painful defecation and bleeding per rectum. The standard treatment of anal fissure is lateral internal sphincterotomy but due to risk of fecal incontinence chemical sphincterotomy is used as alternative to surgical sphincterotomy. Aims & Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of topical diltiazem and lignocaine with glyceryl trinitrate and lignocaine in relieving of symptoms and healing of acute anal fissure in children. Place and duration of study: This study was conducted in the Department of Paediatric Surgery, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore & Department of Paediatric Surgery, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore from September 2017 to September 2018. Material & Methods: Total 228 children were enrolled in the study and randomly divided in group A and B, 114 children in each group. Group A received topical 2% diltiazem cream and 2% lignocaine gel, while group B received topical 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate and 2% lignocaine gel, applied locally, twice daily. Results: There were 78(68.4%) male children in group A and 66(57.9%) in group B. All patients completed 6 week treatment course. The symptoms and condition of the anal fissure were evaluated before start of treatment and at subsequent follow up periods. In group A 55 (48.2%) cases completely healed by second week, while in group B, 33 (28.9%) cases healed. The number of completely healed cases at 4 weeks follow up in group A and group B were 91 (79.8%) and 69(60.5%) respectively, while at week 6 follow up this rate was 95 (83.3%) and 73 (64.0%) respectively. Symptomatic relief in painful defecation observed in group A and group B was 74(64.9%) and 55(48.2%) at week 2, 95(83.3%) and 74(64.9%) at week 4 while 95(83.3%) and 77(67.5%) at week 6 in two groups respectively. Conclusion: Use of combination of topical diltiazem and lignocaine for the treatment of acute anal fissure in paediatric population is preferred over combination of glyceryl trinitrate and lignocaine.

What is the optimum treatment of chronic anal fissure?

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 2337-2339
Author(s):  
Said Zaman Khan ◽  
Anum Arif ◽  
Sabih Nofil ◽  
Bismah Riaz ◽  
Nawabzada Zeeeak Farhat Khan Sherwani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Glyceryl Trinitrate ◽  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Topical Glyceryl Trinitrate ◽  
Group B ◽  
Surgery Department

Aim: To compare the efficacy of topical Glyceryl trinitrate 0.2% (GTN) with Lateral internal spincterotomy (LIS) for treating chronic anal fissure (CAF). Methodology: A randomized control trial was carried out in the general surgery department, Lady reading hospital, LRH MTI, Peshawar (January 2018 to July 2018). All consecutive patients 18 to 60 year old presenting to OPD with a clinical diagnosis of chronic anal fissure were enrolled after informed consent. A total of 60 patients were enrolled. The patients were assigned two groups, including treatment group A (lateral internal spinterotomy) or treatment group B (use of Topical GTN ointment 0.2%). Results: Out of the 60 patients, 30 were enrolled into each group. The female had majority of 57% (group A) and 60% (group B). Mean duration regarding symptoms in group A was 1 year with SD ± 3.51 vs 1 year ± 2.98 in group B. Majority of patients in both groups were in the 20 to 40 years age group (74% in group A vs 83% in group B). Complete fissure healing and resolution of symptoms was observed in 27(91%) in group A vs 20(66%) in group B. Conclusion: In conclusion, we derive that lateral internal spincterotomy is more effectual than Topical Glyceryl trinitrate 0.2% for treating chronic anal fissure. Keywords: Chronic anal fissure, lateral internal spincterotomy, Glyceryltrinitrate

scholarly journals Intermittent Self Dilation – An Option For The Prevention of Urethral Stricture Recurrence After Filliform Follower Urethral Dilation

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-40
Author(s):  
N M Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Urethral Stricture ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Urine Test ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Foley’S Catheter ◽  
Group B ◽  
Stricture Recurrence ◽  
Urethral Dilation ◽  
Lower Urinary

Background: Urethral stricture and its recurrence is still a major problem in male. Several procedures are present for the treatment of the disease. Lapides introduced the concept of intermittent self dilatation (ISD) which has decreased the incidence of recurrence of urethral stricture if doing properly. The aim of the this study was to report the outcomes of ISD for the treatment of urethral stricture after Filliform follower urethral dilatation (FFUD).Method: This was a prospective comparative study, conducted in the department of surgery, urology unit from March 2013 to February 2016. Total of 49 patients were enrolled and were randomly divided into Group A and Group B. In Group A, all the patients were taught ISD with Nelaton Catheter after FFUD. In group B, all patients underwent only FFUD for urethral stricture. In both groups, Foley's catheter was removed after 2 weeks of FFUD. These patients who had difficulty In passing urine or having lower urinary tract syndrome after removal of catheter, were evaluated for urethral stricture recurrency by clinical symptoms, ultrasonography, urine test for culture and sensitivity, cystoscopy/urethrogram as necessarily.Result: In Group A, 4 patients out of 20(20%)developed urethral stricture recurrency where as in Group B,18 patients out of 23 (78.26%) developed urethral stricture recurrency. Therefore, the rate of urethral stricture recurrence is significantly more in group B than the Group A (p< 0.001).Conclusion: ISD is an effective way for the prevention of urethtral stricture recurrence after FFUD. JNGMC,  Vol. 14 No. 2 December 2016, Page: 38-40

Modified Lift Versus Cutting Seton for Transphincteric Fistula -Experience at Tertiary Care Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 3257-3260
Author(s):  
Muhammad Najam Iqbal ◽  
Ashfaq Nasir
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Anal Incontinence ◽  
Complete Healing ◽  
Fistula Tract ◽  
Fistula Closure ◽  
Fistula In Ano ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Cutting Seton ◽  
Group B

Background: Fistula in ano is a common disease which has high recurrence rate and high fecal incontinence rate after surgery. We compared modified LIFT (Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) through lateral approach ) with cutting seton for transphincteric fistula. Aim: This study is aimed at which procedure is better with respect to postoperative complications Study design: It was a prospective comparative study. Methods: This was a prospective comparative study from 01-01-2019 to 30-06-2021 which was conducted on 50 patients who presented with transsphincteric fistula in ano (FIA) in surgical ward of Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur. Patients were divided into two groups .Patients of Group A underwent modified lift procedure and patients of group B underwent cutting seton procedure. Data was collected on a proforma which included patients’ name ,age ,sex, age group, comorbid disease like diabetes mellitus ,chronic liver disease, cardiovascular disease and chronic renal failure, fistula tract involving less than 50% or more than 50% external sphincter ,procedure done, healing time of wound, complications like recurrence and incontinence. Patients were followed for 6 months for healing rate ,recurrence and incontinence. Data was analysed on spss 22 version Results: In Group A, complete healing (fistula closure without recurrence) was achieved in 20 patients (80%) out of 25. There was no case of anal incontinence after the procedure. 5 (20%) patients experienced recurrence in 6 months . In Group B, complete healing (fistula closure without recurrence) was achieved in 21 patients (84%), in 6 months follow up . 4(16%) patients were diagnosed as a case of anal incontinence. There were 4 (16%) patients with recurrence. Conclusion: Modified LIFT is better in terms of incontinence where as cutting seton is better in terms of recurrence.it is suggested that for high lying fistula modified LIFT is better procedure and for low lying fistula involving less than 50% sphincter cutting seton is better procedure.. Keywords: Modified LIFT (ligation of ineter sphincteric fistula tract) ,Cutting seton , transphincteric fistula.

scholarly journals A modification of the Ponseti method for clubfoot management: a prospective comparative study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Reda Ali Sheta ◽  
Mohamed El-Sayed ◽  
Hisham Abdel-Ghani ◽  
Sameh Saber ◽  
Amani Salah Eldin Mohammed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Method ◽  
Ponseti Method ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Multicentre Cohort Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Group B ◽  
Multicentre Cohort

Purpose We aimed to compare our parent-based exercise programem’s efficacy with the foot abduction brace (FAB) Ponseti manipulation as a retention programme. Methods We conducted this prospective multicentre cohort study between August 2009 and November 2019. The included children were allocated into one of two groups according to the retention protocol. The Pirani and Laaveg-Ponseti scores were used to assess the feet clinically and functionally. Radiological assessment was performed using standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the feet. We assessed the parents’ satisfaction and adherence to the retention method. SPSS version 25 was used for the statistical analysis. Results A total of 1265 feet in 973 children were included. Group A included 637 feet managed with FAB, while group B included 628 feet managed with our retention programme. All patients were followed up to the age of four years. At the final follow-up, Pirani scores in group A participants were excellent, good and poor in 515, 90, and 32 feet, respectivel, while in group B the scores were excellent, good and poor in 471, 110 and 44 feet, respectively. The mean total score of Laaveg-Ponseti was 87.81 (sd 19.82) in group A and 90.55 (sd 20.71) in group B (p = 0.02). Group B participants showed higher satisfaction with the treatment method (p = 0.011) and more adherence to the treatment (p = 0.013). Conclusion The deformity’s recurrence related to the brace’s non-compliance in the Ponseti method might be reduced by substituting the brace with our home-based daily stretching exercises. Level of Evidence II

scholarly journals Single Layer Extra-Mucosal Versus Double Layer Intestinal Anastomosis for Colostomy Closure: A Prospective Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-99
Author(s):  
Layth Saleh Owaid ◽  
Imad Wajeeh Al-Shahwani ◽  
Zuhair B. Kamal ◽  
Laith Naif Hindosh ◽  
Abbas Farman Abdulrahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Double Layer ◽  
Intestinal Anastomosis ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Anastomosis Group ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Mean Cost ◽  
Mean Time

Background: The main objective was to compare the outcome of single layer interrupted extra-mucosal sutures with that of double layer suturing in the closure of colostomies. Subjects and Methods: Sixty-seven patients with closure colostomy were assigned in a prospective randomized fashion into either single layer extra-mucosal anastomosis (Group A) or double layer anastomosis (Group B). Primary outcome measures included mean time taken for anastomosis, immediate postoperative complications, and mean duration of hospital stay. Secondary outcome measures assessed the postoperative return of bowel function, and the overall mean cost. Chi-square test and student t-test did the statistical analysis.. Results:  Thirty-two patients were allocated to group A and 35 patients to group B. The mean time taken for anastomosis was significantly shorter in group A (23.25 ± 1.20 min in group A vs. 36.71 ± 1.93 min in group B; P<0.001). A significant shorter duration of hospital stay was seen in group A (7.00 ± 1.778 days in group A vs. 9.74 ± 1.990 days in group B; P<0.001). The detection of bowel sound was substantially quicker in group A as compared to group B (4.56 ± 0.50 days in group A vs. 6.46±0.50 days in group B; P<0.001). There was no significant discrepancy between the two groups regarding anastomotic leak rates (P= 0.543). The mean cost of double layer intestinal anastomosis method was significantly higher than that of single layer anastomosis (P<0.001). Conclusions: The use of single layer extra-mucosal anastomosis of the intestine has the advantage of taking less time, less morbidity and cost-effective to perform with the same rate of anastomotic leak in the closure of colostomy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document