scholarly journals Karakteristik Butir Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Pangkalpinang

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-221
Author(s):  
Anis Faridah

This research is a study of quantitative descriptive. The purpose of this research is to describe the characteristics of final semester exam items for grade XI in the History subject at SMA Negeri 1 Pangkalpinang using the classical test theory approach. The research of the subject was 138 students of class XI in Social Sciences Major. The result of the research shows that final exam questions in the history subject class XI of SMA Negeri 1 Pangkalpinang are proper to use. This shows that from the validity of the items which there are 39 items of questions (97.5%) which are proven empirically valid with a 0.818 reliability coefficient. Other than that, there are 27 items of questions (67,5%) that can fulfill the criteria for the difficulty level, distinguishing power, and distractor function so it can be used directly to measure the student's ability without correction. While 12 items of questions (30%) need to be fixed and 1 item of question (2,5%) is declared to be invalid so it can't be used to measure the student's ability in History Subject. Permasalahan yang melatarbelakangi penelitian ini adalah pengembangan soal penilaian akhir semester mata pelajaran sejarah yang tidak melalui tahapan analisis butir soal sehingga kualitas butir soal tidak diketahui. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan karakteristik butir soal penilaian akhir semester mata pelajaran sejarah kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Pangkalpinang menggunakan pendekatan teori tes klasik. Subjek penelitian berjumlah 138 peserta didik kelas XI jurusan IPS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa soal PAS mata pelajaran sejarah kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Pangkalpinang telah layak digunakan. Hal ini dibuktikan dari validitas butir soal yang mana terdapat 39 butir soal (97,5%) terbukti valid secara empirik dengan koefisien reliabilitas sebesar 0,818. Selain itu terdapat 27 butir soal (67,5%) yang memenuhi kriteria tingkat kesukaran, daya beda, dan keberfungsian distraktor sehingga dapat digunakan langsung untuk mengukur kemampuan peserta didik tanpa perbaikan. Sedangkan sebanyak 12 butir soal (30%) perlu dilakukan perbaikan dan 1 butir soal (2,5%) dinyatakan gugur sehingga tidak dapat digunakan untuk mengukur kemampuan peserta didik pada mata pelajaran sejarah.

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Rahmat Aziz

This research aims to examine the validity and reliability of mental health scale in the workplace by using the Rasch model approach as well as compare the results of analysis with classical test theory approach. The subject were 60 employees at the State Islamic University Malang. The analysis showed that the mental health scale in the workplace is declared valid and reliable either by using the approach of Rasch model and classical test theory. This means that both approaches are able to find the same results on the test of mental health scale in the workplace.


Author(s):  
Reyhaneh Aminalroaya ◽  
Fatemeh Sadat Mirzadeh ◽  
Kazem Heidari ◽  
Mahtab Alizadeh-Khoei ◽  
Farshad Sharifi ◽  
...  

A validation study the Iranian Modified Barthel Index (MBI) in hospitalized acute stroke elderly by classical test theory approach and investigate Rasch analysis for both Iranian version MBI and BI and compare the hierarchical item difficulty of them. Face-to-face interview with 100 geriatric stroke inpatients 60+ or their caregivers was done in a cross-sectional study. First, construct validity of MBI analyzed by the classical test theory, then Rasch analysis were done for BI and MBI. The reliability of the Iranian MBI was significant at 0.955. One factor achieved by the variance of 83.2%. In Rasch analysis for MBI, the most difficult item was stair climbing, whereas the simplest items were bowel and bladder control. In BI, the most difficult items were toilet use and ambulation. The Iranian MBI is very accurate and reliable; therefore the use of MBI to measure better outcomes in stroke elderly inpatients is recommended comparing with BI.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-146
Author(s):  
Yance Manoppo ◽  
Djemari Mardapi

This study aimed to reveal: (1) the characteristics of items of Chemistry Test in National Examination by using the classical test theory and item response theory; (2) the amount of cheating which occured by using Angoff's B-index Method, Pair 1 Method, Pair 2 Method, Modified Error Similarity Analysis (MESA) Method, and G2 Method; (3) the methods that detect more cheating in the implementation of the Chemistry Test in National Examination for high schools in the year 2011/2012 in Maluku Province. The results of the analysis with the classical test theory approach show that 77.5% items have item difficulty functioning well, 55% items have discrimination yet qualified and 70% items have distractor that works well with the index reliability test of 0,772. The analysis using the item response theory approach shows that 14 (35%) items fit with the model, the maximum function information is 11,4069 at θ = -1,6, and the magnitude of the error of measurement is 2,296. The number of pairs who are suspected of cheating is as follows: 13 pairs according to Angoff's B-index Method, 212 pairs according to Pair 1 Method, 444 pairs according to Pair 2 Method, 7 pairs according to MESA Method, and 102 pairs according to G2 Method. The most widely detecting cheating in a row is a   Pair 2, Pair 1, G2, Angoff's B-index, and MESA.


1977 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donal E. Muir

Examination of the methodological literature of the behavioral and social sciences indicates that measurement terms are used differently than in the natural sciences. The rationale for these departures is usually ascribed to classical test theory, a measurement model claimed to be more applicable to psychological and social data than the traditional measurement model of the natural sciences, which requires the development of standard instruments defining, by consensus, parametric values. Classical test theory seemingly avoids this necessity, but only by inviting validation by fiat, resulting in instrument evaluations which are trivial, misleading, or invalid. The development of measurement in the behavioral and social sciences might be encouraged by the abandonment of classical test theory and a return to natural-science measurement theory.


MADRASAH ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-39
Author(s):  
Nuril Huda ◽  
Tutik Sri Wahyuni

This research aims to: 1) find out the characteristics of the science items try out National Standar School Exams (USBN) in the academic year 2018/2019 based on Classical Test Theory (CTT); 2) find out the number of the science items try out USBN in the academic year 2018/2019 in relation to cognitive level. This type of research is a descriptive research with a quantitative approach. The data obtained was a computer answer sheet of 5022 students who took USBN try out of Elementary School 2019 on February 21, 2019 in Tulungagung Regency. The results showed that: 1) The characteristics of the science items try out USBN in the academic year 2018/2019 based on Classical Test Theory (CTT) in aspects of: a) validity of 35 items valid; b) the reliability value of 0.818 is very high; c) the level of difficulty level: 4 items (11.43%) are difficult, 9 items (25.71%) are moderate, 16 items (45.71%) are easy and 6 items (7.140%) are very easy; d) discriminating power: 3 items (8.57%) are bad, 12 items (34.29%) are good enough, 15 items (42.86%) are moderate, and 5 items (14.29%) are good; e) the quality of options: 17 items (48.57%) without revision, 9 items (25.71%) one option revision, 5 items (14.29%) 2 option revisions, and 4 items (11.43% ) wrong revision of 3 options; f) 13 items (37.14%) about the science try out USBN in the academic year 2018/2019 have quite good and good characteristics, so they can be included in the question bank; 2) items the science of  try out USBN in the academic year 2018/2019 in relationship with cognitive level, 11 items (31.43%) category L1 (knowledge), 10 items (28.57%) category L1 (understanding), 4 items (11.43%) category L2 (application), and 10 items (28.57%) category L3 (reasoning). Of the 13 items entered in the question bank with cognitive level, the science try out USBN in the academic year 2018/2019 was dominated at the cognitive level L1 (knowledge and understanding).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document