scholarly journals Detection of Potential ESBL, Ampc, and Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producers (MDR-GNB) Through In-vitro Susceptibility Testing of Genitourinary Specimens in a Community-based Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dina Abed ◽  
Ammar Jusmani ◽  
Sinan Alrifai
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Beta Lactamase ◽  
Community Based ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility Testing

scholarly journals Atypical clinical and laboratory features of fish-tank granuloma: A case report

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2050313X1880407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Sander ◽  
Judith L Isaac-Renton ◽  
Megan A Sander
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Mycobacterium Marinum ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
Laboratory Features ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Fish Tank ◽  
Fish Tank Granuloma

We report a case of cutaneous Mycobacterium marinum infection with the unusual reported features of pruritus and paresthesia. In addition, we report a lack of in-vivo response to antibiotics based on in-vitro susceptibility testing.

scholarly journals In Vitro Comparative Efficacy of Voriconazole and Itraconazole against Fluconazole-Susceptible and -Resistant Cryptococcus neoformans Isolates

1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 471-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hong Nguyen ◽  
Christine Y. Yu
Keyword(s):  
Cryptococcus Neoformans ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Fluconazole Resistant ◽  
Dose Dependent

ABSTRACT In vitro susceptibility testing for 50 clinical isolates of fluconazole-susceptible or -resistant Cryptococcus neoformans was performed with itraconazole and voriconazole. Voriconazole was more potent than itraconazole for fluconazole-susceptible isolates and as potent as itraconazole for fluconazole-susceptible dose-dependent isolates and for fluconazole-resistant isolates. For fluconazole-resistant isolates, the voriconazole and itraconazole MICs ranged from 1 to 2 μg/ml.

scholarly journals Current and Emerging Azole Antifungal Agents

1999 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Sheehan ◽  
Christopher A. Hitchcock ◽  
Carol M. Sibley
Keyword(s):  
Fungal Pathogens ◽  
Antifungal Agents ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Mechanisms Of Action ◽  
Current Status ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
Clinical Resistance ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility Testing

SUMMARY Major developments in research into the azole class of antifungal agents during the 1990s have provided expanded options for the treatment of many opportunistic and endemic fungal infections. Fluconazole and itraconazole have proved to be safer than both amphotericin B and ketoconazole. Despite these advances, serious fungal infections remain difficult to treat, and resistance to the available drugs is emerging. This review describes present and future uses of the currently available azole antifungal agents in the treatment of systemic and superficial fungal infections and provides a brief overview of the current status of in vitro susceptibility testing and the growing problem of clinical resistance to the azoles. Use of the currently available azoles in combination with other antifungal agents with different mechanisms of action is likely to provide enhanced efficacy. Detailed information on some of the second-generation triazoles being developed to provide extended coverage of opportunistic, endemic, and emerging fungal pathogens, as well as those in which resistance to older agents is becoming problematic, is provided.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document