scholarly journals Light and Shadow in Hate-Speech Cases: A Forensic Linguistics

Author(s):  
Agustina ◽  
Nurizzati ◽  
Siti Ainim ◽  
Muhammad Adek ◽  
Awliya Rahmi
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raed Toghuj

Recently, forensic linguistics has been an arena of significance in many fields of study especially in judicial systems, legal and forensic matters, investigation, and open-source intelligence across the globe. The term typically refers to legal and professional analysis of recorded or written language by experts (forensic linguists) to provide expert and correct interpretation. It is particularly used in legal matters especially in the court and criminal justice systems. In the court system, forensic linguistics is heavily applied to examine language evidence – either recorded in voice or handwritten in civil matters or crimes. The analysis or examination is carried out for two major reasons. First, the analysis is utilized when relevant investigations are carried out with a focus to help in identifying witnesses or suspects in specific cases or scenes, or the determination of the significance of writing or utterance to a case. Secondly, forensic linguistics plays a pivotal role when written or spoken language samples are presented to a court as evidence. In such contexts, forensic linguists provide expert testimonies of correct interpretation of the samples. As such, language analysis is significant in any judicial matters and systems provided the questionable language constitutes crimes. In most cases, crimes such as threats, hate speech, bribery, hate literature, coercion among others necessitate the use of a linguist expert for correct and most importantly professional interpretation. Evidently, the concept of forensic linguistics is ascribed to provide the truth from recorded speeches or voices and written languages in the face of a crime or relevant legal investigation matters. This paper will posit on the different ways and methods that forensic linguistics is applied to investigate and provide professional interpretation of recorded and written languages in evidentiary and investigative contexts.


Author(s):  
R. K. Makhachashvili ◽  
A. O. Bakhtina

The era of the "Network society" acquires a continuous transformation, constantly changing the emphasis of the ontological and ontic essence of human species homo ciberneticus. However, communication remains fundamental to human existence as a substratum of interpersonal understanding, with its intended consequent effect on the various spheres of the existential paradigm. Language, as the ousia of human consciousness and the process of humanization in general, is a true substance that encodes communicative acts, that in computer being attains a broader problem of decoding. That is why in our research, we explain one of the most popular types of digital communication today: verbal messages using the artificial language emoji and non-verbal texts just with the help of optical signs. The purpose of the article led to the derivation of a hypothetico-deductive theory of allowing emoji approval in forensic linguistics expertise. That theory we have approved in the probable court cases of Ukraine with an appeal to the emoji has already approved in forensic expertise in the global context. After selecting specific emoji from different forensic cases in Europe and the United States, we have implemented an experiment with the creation of an empirical construction: a mock text with the coded contexts using selected emoji. Respondents had to decode emoji based on individual perception and interpretation. The results of the experiment with its subsequent analytical processing demonstrated the possibility and necessity of involving emoji in forensic linguistics expertise as an iconographic or pictographic type, which is relevant to the specificity of global digitization and the organization of digital communication. Taking into account all the verification stages of the data obtained, we have nominated the selected emoji as hate emoji, which are capable of destroying the communicative act and which are a digital correlate of hate speech.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Yorgos Christidis

This article analyzes the growing impoverishment and marginalization of the Roma in Bulgarian society and the evolution of Bulgaria’s post-1989 policies towards the Roma. It examines the results of the policies so far and the reasons behind the “poor performance” of the policies implemented. It is believed that Post-communist Bulgaria has successfully re-integrated the ethnic Turkish minority given both the assimilation campaign carried out against it in the 1980s and the tragic events that took place in ex-Yugoslavia in the 1990s. This Bulgaria’s successful “ethnic model”, however, has failed to include the Roma. The “Roma issue” has emerged as one of the most serious and intractable ones facing Bulgaria since 1990. A growing part of its population has been living in circumstances of poverty and marginalization that seem only to deteriorate as years go by. State policies that have been introduced since 1999 have failed at large to produce tangible results and to reverse the socio-economic marginalization of the Roma: discrimination, poverty, and social exclusion continue to be the norm. NGOs point out to the fact that many of the measures that have been announced have not been properly implemented, and that legislation existing to tackle discrimination, hate crime, and hate speech is not implemented. Bulgaria’s political parties are averse in dealing with the Roma issue. Policies addressing the socio-economic problems of the Roma, including hate speech and crime, do not enjoy popular support and are seen as politically damaging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document