scholarly journals Discordance between fasting plasma glucose and A1c in the diagnosis and management of diabetes

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 243-255
Author(s):  
Veerasak Sarinnapakorn ◽  
Chaicharn Deerochanawong ◽  
Sathit Niramitmahapanya ◽  
Navaporn Napartivaumnuay ◽  
Thitinan Treesaranuwattana

There are pros and cons of using fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and A1c for the diagnosis and management of diabetes. Still, discordance between FPG and A1c is a common problem in clinical practice, and there are no definite international guidelines for dealing with it. This article explains the causes of these anomalies and the factors that affect the results of tests, and it also recommends some appropriate techniques for investigation and management of cases of discordance between FPG and A1c.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Ye ◽  
Lijiao Yang ◽  
Guoqin Wang ◽  
Weijing Bian ◽  
Fengbo Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundThe discrepancy between glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in clinical practice may be related to factors such as acute stress, renal dysfunction, and anemia, and its relationship with in-hospital outcomes is uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the type of discrepancy between HbA1c and FPG and in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and diabetes.MethodsThe Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China - Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC-ACS) project is a national, hospital-based quality improvement project with an ongoing database. Patients with ACS, diabetes and complete HbA1c and FPG values at admission were included. The consistent group included patients with HbA1c < 6.5% and FPG < 7.0 mmol/L or HbA1c ≥ 6.5% and FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L. The discrepancy group included patients with HbA1c ≥ 6.5% and FPG < 7.0 mmol/L (increased HbA1c group) or HbA1c < 6.5% and FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L (increased FBG group).ResultsA total of 7,762 patients were included in this study. The numbers of patients in the consistent and discrepancy groups were 5,490 and 2,272 respectively. In the discrepancy group, increased HbA1c accounted for 77.5% of discrepancies, and increased FPG accounted for 22.5% of discrepancies. After adjusting for confounders, patients in the increased FPG group had a 1.6-fold increased risk of heart failure (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.08-2.44), a 1.6-fold increased risk of composite cardiovascular death and heart failure (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.09-2.43), and a 1.6-fold increased risk of composite major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and heart failure (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.08-2.24) compared to patients in the increased HbA1c group.Conclusions Patients with an increased FPG but normal HbA1c had a higher risk of in-hospital adverse outcomes than those with increased HbA1c but normal FPG.This result may indicate that when HbA1c and FPG are inconsistent in patients with ACS and diabetes, the increased FPG that may be caused by stress hyperglycemia may have a more substantial adverse effect than increased HbA1c, which may be caused by chronic hyperglycemia. These high-risk patients should be given more attention and closer monitoring in clinical practice.


Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1374-P
Author(s):  
BHAVADHARINI BALAJI ◽  
RANJIT MOHAN ANJANA ◽  
MOHAN DEEPA ◽  
PRADEEPA RAJENDRA ◽  
UMA RAM ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document