Gendered Narratives on Chronic Pain in South Korea: Women’s and Men’s Experiences of Social Stigma and the Narrative Strategies

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-185
Author(s):  
HyangSoo Kim
Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (32) ◽  
pp. e11709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anyela Marcela Castañeda Anaya ◽  
Jae-Kyu Choi ◽  
Chang-soon Lee ◽  
Euna Oh ◽  
Youngwon Kim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58
Author(s):  
Matthias Schneider ◽  
Miriam Moser ◽  
Varius Dannenberg ◽  
reas Mangold ◽  
Robert Sch鰊bauer ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 3;13 (3;5) ◽  
pp. 289-293
Author(s):  
Shalini Shah

Introduction: The synthetic opioid methadone is a promising analgesic for the management of chronic neuropathic pain. Methadone therapy is increasing as its advantages are being realized over other opioids. Methadone’s lack of known active metabolites, high oral bioavailability, low cost, and its additional receptor activity as an antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors make it an attractive analgesic. Methods: We surveyed 550 pain physicians to determine their prescribing practices of methadone. The study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. A list of 550 pain physicians, which included practitioners in private practice, university settings, and community hospitals, were obtained and surveys sent via mail. The list was obtained through the American Pain Society’s membership list. Out of 550 surveys sent, 124 replies were returned. Results: The 124 surveys that were returned included pain physicians from various settings: 20 responses from physicians practicing at a university setting, 16 responses from a community setting, 54 responses from a private setting, one from university and community settings, 7 from community and private settings, 3 from university and community and private settings; 23 did not specify. Of the 124 physicians, 111 prescribe methadone in their pain practice. Of the 13 physicians who do not prescribe methadone, the main reason for not using the drug for 5 physicians was because of social stigma, 2 because of minimal experience with the drug, 2 because the drug was not effective, one because of lack of knowledge, and one because of potential adverse effects. Of the 111 physicians who use methadone, 55 stated that social stigma was the most common reason patients refuse to take methadone for the treatment of pain, 44 because of adverse effects, and 5 stated “other” as the reason patients refuse to take methadone. Of 111 physicians who prescribe methadone, 100 prescribed it for neuropathic pain, 101 for somatic pain, 80 for visceral pain, 78 for cancer pain, and 34 for sickle cell pain. Also, 21 stated that methadone was the primary opioid they prescribed. Of the 111 physicians who prescribe methadone, 86 start methadone at low dose and titrate up to minimize side effects. Fourteen clinicians load methadone and titrate down to minimize adverse effects while maintaining analgesia. Conclusion: The majority of survey responders (90%) prescribed methadone in their pain practice, but on a very limited basis; 59% state <20% of their patients are on methadone. Three times a day dosing schedule was the most typical regimen (57%) while 77% prefer to titrate up on the dosage. It seems interesting that many clinicians do not prescribe methadone as a primary analgesic. One reason for this is due to the social stigma of its use in treatment of heroin addicts. Also, a lack of widely recognized treatment algorithms or guidelines to assist clinicians with opioid conversions and maintenance might be playing a role. The role of stigma as a barrier to adequate treatment of chronic pain among pain physicians prescribing practices is a fundamental, yet unexplored issue. Key words: Methadone, chronic pain, behavior, stigma, survey, opioid, education, society


2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inseo Son ◽  
Hyemin Lee ◽  
Jooyoung Park ◽  
Seung-Sup Kim

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 103-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyemin Lee ◽  
Don Operario ◽  
Jacob J. van den Berg ◽  
Horim Yi ◽  
Sungsub Choo ◽  
...  

This study aims to identify health disparities among transgender adults in South Korea (hereafter Korea), where they widely experience social stigma. We assessed prevalence of nine health indicators using a nationwide cross-sectional survey of 255 Korean transgender adults in 2017. Standardized prevalence ratios of these indicators were estimated using four nationally representative surveys in Korea that included the same health measures. Overall, transgender adults had a significantly higher risk of adverse health outcomes than the general population in Korea. Specifically, disparities in mental health outcomes between transgender adults and the general population were statistically significant. The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 6.44 and 9.71 times higher among transgender adults than women and men in the general population, respectively. For suicidal ideation, transgender adults reported 6.49 and 18.83 times greater risk than women and men in the general population, respectively. Our findings indicate that Korean transgender adults are at a higher risk of negative health outcomes than the general population.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Hogi Jung ◽  
Rayun Yang ◽  
Yaki Yang

AIM: The purpose of this study was to identify the life experiences of women diagnosed with leprosy in South Korea. METHODS: The study included seven purposively chosen participants from the Sorokdo Hospital (leprosy resident hospital). Data were collected through a series of in-depth individual interviews from January to July 2015. The data analysis method was based on Colaizzi&rsquo;s approach. RESULTS: The study&rsquo;s results showed that the experiences of women diagnosed with leprosy in South Korea consisted of 10 themes and 4 theme clusters: 1) A disease perceived as a state of damnation, 2) Irresistible karma, 3) Fading candles in the wind, and 4) A will to live. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that health care professionals should pay attention to not only treating the physical and psychological symptoms of leprosy patients but also attempt to influence the community and public culture in order to reduce the social stigma around this disease. The results of this study can help us in a better understanding of the lived experiences of women diagnosed with leprosy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document