Interspecific competition between Rhinocyllus conicus and Urophora soistitialis L on nodding thistle in Canterbury

2005 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 140-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.R. McNeill ◽  
C.J. Fletcher

Nodding thistle receptacle weevil Rhinocyllus conicus and gallfly Urophora solstitialis attack the capitula of nodding thistle Carduus nutans L Between 31 October and 15 December 2003 the phenology of both R conicus and U solstitialis was studied at a dryland site in Canterbury Adult R conicus were more numerous than U solstitialis on capitula throughout the experiment Larvae of R conicus were first found on 11 November (15 of capitula infested) and peaked on 2 December with 53 of capitula infested Only 3 of capitula were infested by U solstitialis Adult R conicus or U solstitialis emerged from 79 of the selected primary and secondary capitula The majority of infested capitula (81) contained only R conicus 2 contained only U solstitialis while 17 contained both insect species Parasitism of R conicus by the braconid parasitoid Microctonus aethiopoides was low and occurred when most weevil eggs had been laid

Weed Science ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Hodgson ◽  
N. E. Rees

A weevil [Rhinocyllus conicus(Froelich)] host specific toCarduus, Cirsium, Silybum, andOnopordum, was introduced into Gallatin County, Montana, for biocontrol of musk thistle (Carduus nutansL.). Releases were made in 1969, 1971, 1972, and 1973 on local musk thistle infestations. The insects became established and overwintered successfully. In 1974,R. conicuswas found over a 1,280-km2area of the county in seed heads of musk thistle. Weevil larvae severely infected the primary flowers, but only a few secondary and later flowers were attacked. Seed production from infected primary flowers was greatly reduced, and other factors influenced reduction of seeds from secondary and later flowers.


1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. Buntin ◽  
R. D. Hudson ◽  
T. R. Murphy

Rhinocyllus conicus Froelich was introduced and successfully established at 21 sites in northern Georgia for biological control of musk thistle, Carduus nutans L. A total of 9,310 adults were released from 1990 through 1992. Releases of reproductively mature adults in the spring were much more successful than summer releases of teneral adults. Progeny were observed in all spring-release sites, and population increases occurred at most sites one and two years after release. Consumption of infested capitula by cattle reduced R. conicus numbers at some sites. After two years, weevils had dispersed up to 0.6 km from the initial release point. Transfer of R. conicus to new sites in Georgia will begin in 1993.


Weed Science ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Puttler ◽  
S. H. Long ◽  
E. J. Peters

A weevil,(Rhinocyllus conicusFroelich) was introduced into Missouri in 1975 to aid in reducing populations of musk thistle,(Carduus nutansL.). The weevil was recovered in 1976 from as far as 3.2 km from the release site and 4.8 km in 1977. Infestation levels of flower heads at the release site ranged from 46 to 90%. Native parasites(Bracon mellitorSay) and [Aliolus curculionis(Fitch)] were reared from weevil larvae.


1991 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 929-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L. Littlefield

AbstractRhinocyllus conicus Froelich was introduced into Wyoming in 1975 for the biological control of musk thistle, Carduus nutans L. A survey of 15 release sites was conducted in 1986 to determine parasitism of R. conicus. Eight species of parasitic Hymenoptera were identified. Parasitism of R. conicus infecting the flower heads of musk thistle was low (0.6%), but greater for weevils within the peduncles (17%). Parasitism varied among release sites, ranging from 0.0 to 1.3%, but was not significantly correlated with the duration of weevil establishment.


Weed Science ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. W. Surles ◽  
L. T. Kok ◽  
R. L. Pienkowski

Rhinocyllus conicusFroel. (Col.: Curculionidae) larvae feeding within the capitula ofCarduusthistles may reduce production of viable seeds. EachR. conicuslarva destroyed 9.7 developing musk thistle (Carduus nutansL.) seeds. An average musk thistle capitulum, 29.2 mm diameter, produced 15.3 viable achenes per millimeter of diameter for an average of 447 viable seeds. Surveys of 23 release sites in Virginia revealed that thistles at 12 had sustained a population of weevils. Weevil eggs at six sites have increased in abundance, and establishment appears assured. Colonization ofR. conicuswas enhanced by spring or early summer releases; larger stocks of insects were required for late summer releases. The weevils exhibited better synchronization with musk thistle than with plumeless thistle (Carduus acanthoidesL.); and best success has been achieved where extensive, persistent stands of musk thistle were available.


1984 ◽  
Vol 116 (10) ◽  
pp. 1335-1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Shorthouse ◽  
R. G. Lalonde

AbstractThe larvae of Rhinocyllus conicus Froel. feed within the flowerheads of Carduus nutans by tunneling through callus that appears near feeding sites, by forming chambers of callus beneath developing florets, or by tunneling within pith of the peduncle. The induction of callus by R. conicus is a gall-like response providing the larvae with additional nutriment and a shelter. Callus formation also reduces plant resources destined for developing additional flowerheads.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Carlos Santos ◽  
Yurixhi Maldonado‐López ◽  
Henrique Venâncio ◽  
Wanessa Rejane Almeida ◽  
Daniel Tirapeli Felício ◽  
...  

Weed Science ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 966-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loke T. Kok ◽  
Thomas J. McAvoy ◽  
Warren T. Mays

Field plot experiments were conducted to examine the interactions between tall fescue grass (Festuca arundinaceaSchreb.), musk thistle (Carduus nutansL. =thoermeriWeinmann # CRUNU), and two thistle weevilsTrichosirocalus horridus(Panzer) andRhinocyllus conicusFroelich. Restriction of musk thistle growth was greatest when the weevils were allowed to feed on the musk thistles competing with tall fescue. Significant reductions were found in total musk thistle seeds per plant, root weight, flower buds per plant, stem dry weight, seeds per head, root crown diameter, stem height, rosette diameter, and head diameter. Seed weight and viability were not reduced. Of the three stress factors (tall fescue and the twoCarduusthistle weevils), tall fescue had the greatest impact. When musk thistle seeds were planted in 1-yr-old tall fescue, germination was low. Seeds that germinated did not grow more than four Leaves and none of the thistles developed to the reproductive stage. A 1-year-old tall fescue stand effectively prevented musk thistle reproduction. Thus, tall fescue helped suppress musk thistle growth more quickly than the use ofCarduusthistle weevils alone without competitive vegetation. Dry weight of tall fescue grass was lower in musk thistle-infested plots than in the thistle-free plots.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document