Eine neo-existenzialistische Konzeption von Unterricht und Lehrerhandeln? Zu Gert Biestas Wiederentdeckung und Rehabilitation des Lehrens und des Lehrers

2018 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewald Terhart

Neo-Existentialism as a Theory of Classroom Teaching? Reviewing Gert Biesta’s Re(dis) -covery of Teaching Gert Biesta is well known as a critic of a dominantly psychological interpretation of education and learning. He is also sceptic towards the evidence-based approach to educational reform and administration. Instead of this current dominating paradigm he defends and praises »the beautiful risk of education« based on a non-technological, dialogical interpretation of education. But what about teaching? In his new book Biesta rediscovers and recovers teaching and the teacher. His central idea is to disconnect teaching and learning, to free teaching from learning. Teaching cannot produce or cause learning; measured learning progress of students cannot be regarded as an indicator for successful teaching. This approach resembles former existentialist ideas on education and teaching. In this critical review central elements of Biesta’s approach to teaching and teachers are presented and discussed in the light of other theories of classroom teaching.

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Johnson ◽  
J. List-Ivankovic ◽  
W.O. Eboh ◽  
J. Ireland ◽  
D. Adams ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
George L. Engel

Effective classroom teaching, and learning about grief and mourning must involve both didactic instruction and the group dynamics of personal involvement. An appreciation of the individuality of the grieving experience must be incorporated into the broader understanding of grief in its generic aspects. In this paper such an approach is described and illustrated with verbatim excerpts from an exercise conducted with eighty participants in a workshop on helping the bereaved.


1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridget M. Leggett

CENTRALLY prescribed managerialist practices have become part of the assumed processes of secondary school administration. But the logic which linked the new practices for central office bureaucrats was absent in the understandings of teachers in Western Australian secondary schools in 1992. There were substantial differences in the meanings attributed to key concepts and the value ascribed to the required procedures. The implications of these differences are established in this paper, using insights from central office and school personnel. Particular attention is given to the three agendas of school improvement, accountability and participative decision making. The pressure to re-norm the management of schooling has been applied through a range of discursive practices including the use of language, the presumption of meaning and the enforcement of policy. Although claims have been made that these changes have resulted in a more professional approach to teaching and learning, questions remain as to their real impact.


2004 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Marshall ◽  
Nicola Cartwright ◽  
Karen Mattick

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document