scholarly journals Evaluation of knowledge and awareness of adverse drug reaction reporting among patients visiting a tertiary care hospital in northern India

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 310-315
Author(s):  
Anupriya Thadani ◽  
Afroz Abidi ◽  
Fardan Qadeer ◽  
Deepak Bhagchandani ◽  
Roohana Hasan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reaction ◽  
Drug Reaction ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Reaction Reporting ◽  
Northern India

scholarly journals Knowledge of Adverse Drug Reactions Reporting among Doctors and Nurses in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (233) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rekha Shah ◽  
Surya B. Parajuli ◽  
Suman Pokharel
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reaction ◽  
Drug Reaction ◽  
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Good Knowledge ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Reaction Reporting ◽  
Doctors And Nurses

Introduction: Doctors and nurses have a significant role in the detection of serious and unusual drug reactions. Effective implementation of an adverse drug reaction reporting system is required to ensure patient safety and quality care. This study’s objective was to find the prevalence of good knowledge of adverse drug reaction reporting among the Doctors and nurses working in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among doctors and nurses from 15 February 2020 to 15 July 2020 at Birat Medical College and Teaching Hospital. The convenience sampling method was used to select 192 study participants. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to know the knowledge concept of adverse drug reaction reporting. Ethical clearance was taken from IRC (PA-047/2076-77) of Birat Medical College and Teaching Hospital. Written informed consent was taken from each study participant. Collected data were entered in Microsoft Excel 2010 and analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v23. Results: In total, 192 doctors and nurses, the questionnaires were distributed to 52 (27.1%) doctors and 140 (72.9%) nurses. The mean age of study participants was 28.14 years (SD ±4.5). To know the prevalence of knowledge, 15 knowledge related questions of adverse drug reaction had asked. The majority of doctors and nurses had good knowledge about adverse drug reaction reporting, 75% and 64%, respectively. Conclusions: Overall, doctors and nurses have had good knowledge of adverse drug reaction reporting. Data shows there is still more gap in training and experience on adverse drug reaction reporting systems.

scholarly journals Knowledge, attitude and practice of medical professionals towards adverse drug reaction reporting and pharmacovigilance in a tertiary care hospital: a cross sectional study

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 486
Author(s):  
Mangala Srinivas ◽  
Sangeeta Nath Sharma ◽  
Rajendra Holla
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reaction ◽  
Drug Reaction ◽  
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Medical Professionals ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Reaction Reporting ◽  
Attitude And Practice ◽  
Knowledge Attitude And Practice

Background: The present study was planned to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of healthcare providers regarding adverse drug reaction reporting and pharmacovigilance in a tertiary care hospital.Methods: The study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital, it’s a observational, KAP cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. The KAP questionnaires was developed toward pharmacovigilance and ADRs and were used to assess the medical professionals.Results: Only 64% of doctors, 52% PG’s and 40% of nurses knew the correct knowledge regarding Pharmacovigilance (PhV). Regarding the attitude, all the respondents think reporting of ADR is a very necessary. 98% of doctors,80% of postgraduates and 96% of nurses have experienced ADR in the patient in their professional practice but reporting of same is very less. The factors discouraging them from reporting ADR’s was also assessed. 34% said difficult to decide whether ADR has occurred or not, 34% said lack of time, 17%- no remuneration and 15% said a single unreported case may not affect ADR database.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that knowledge and attitude towards pharmacovigilance is gradually improving among medical professionals, but unfortunately the actual practice of ADR reporting is still deficient among them.

scholarly journals ANTIMICROBIAL-RELATED ADVERSE DRUG REACTION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Jindal M ◽  
Sharma Rk
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reaction ◽  
Drug Reaction ◽  
Spontaneous Reporting ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Past History ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Active Monitoring ◽  
Beta Lactam Antibiotics

  Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the adverse drug reaction (ADR) related to commonly used antimicrobials in a tertiary care hospital.Methods: A prospective spontaneous reporting study involving, active methods (pharmacist actively looking for suspected ADRs) and passive methods (stimulating prescribers to report suspected ADRs) was carried out in all departments of a tertiary care hospital, for 1 year. Patients of all age groups were included in the study. The data for the study were taken from case sheets, investigation reports of patients who had experienced an ADR, personal interviews with reporting persons or clinicians, personal interviews with patient or patient’s attendant, past history of medication use, which were generally obtained from, prescriptions from the past, reports of medical and surgical interventions, referral letters, ADR reporting forms. Collected data were then analyze for causality assessment by Naranjo’s scale and severity assessment by Hartwig and Siegel’s scale.Result: During 1 year of study period, 75 ADRs related to antimicrobial were reported among 1354 patients who were given antibiotic for the treatment. The incidence rate of antibiotic was found to be 5.53%. The department that reported ADR was medicine (10.16%), ENT (4.6%), pediatric (8.12%), orthopedics (06.9%), surgery (06.9%), chest and tuberculosis (04.6%), obstetrics and gynecology (06.9%), dentistry (02.3%), and skin (10.16%). The most common ADRs were related to gastrointestinal tract; dermatological reactions were second in the list of antimicrobial drugs causing ADR. In this study, among antimicrobials, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactam antibiotics were the most common drugs causing gastrointestinal and dermatological ADRs. There was no unknown ADR reported that may need to be further investigated through active monitoring. All patients recovered from ADRs without any complications. The causality was assessed by Naranjo’s scale and it revealed that out of 75 antibiotics related ADR 48 (64%) were possible, 27 (36%) were probable, 3 (4.00%) were definate, and 0% were unlikely. According to the Hartwig and Siegel’s scale, most of ADR were mild 45 (60%) and moderate 30 (40%) in nature.Conclusion: ADRs related to antimicrobials occurs frequently. Among antimicrobials, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactam antibiotics were the most common drugs causing gastrointestinal and dermatological ADRs. The health-care system can promote the spontaneous reporting of antimicrobial ADR to pharmacovigilance center for ensuring safe drug use and patient care.

scholarly journals IMPACT OF CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS ON ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING BY NURSING HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

2020 ◽  
pp. 175-180
Author(s):  
SUPRIYA SONOWAL ◽  
CHETNA K DESAI ◽  
JIGAR R PANCHAL
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reaction ◽  
Drug Reaction ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Adr Reporting ◽  
Nursing Health

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the impact of certain educational interventions on adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting by nursing health professionals at a tertiary care hospital. Methods: Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of the nurses regarding ADR reporting were evaluated before and after interventions using a KAP questionnaire. Educational interventions carried out among the nurses were workshops, booklets, SMSes, personal briefings, and posters. Number and quality of ADR reported by nurses in pre-intervention (3 months), intervention (10 months), and post-intervention (3 months) phase were compared. Results: There was a significant increase in response rate to questionnaires in the post-intervention phase (post-IP) (97.74%) as compared to pre-intervention (91.28%) phase (pre-IP). The knowledge score of the nurses increased significantly in post-IP (11.65 ± 2.14) as compared to the pre-intervention (6.98 ± 2.46) phase. No ADR was reported by nurses in pre-IP. Thirty nurses reported 30 ADRs in the intervention phase and six nurses reported six ADRs in the post-IP. The mean score of completeness of ADR notification forms decreased significantly in post-IP. Maximum ADRs (10) were reported after the workshops. Conclusion: Educational interventions improved the KAP of ADR reporting by nurses, albeit temporary. This suggests the need of continuous educational interventions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document