Application of a Numerical Experiment to Determine the Parameters of Pipeline Transport Depending on the Flow Stream Velocity

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (9) ◽  
pp. 817-822
Author(s):  
S. M. Kaplunov ◽  
N. G. Valles ◽  
V. Yu. Fursov
1993 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Wierzba ◽  
K. Kar ◽  
G. A. Karim

The blowout limits of a methane diffusion flame in a co-flowing air-fuel or air-diluent stream were determined for a range of surrounding co-flow stream velocities, both laminar and turbulent, up to ~ 1.50 m/s. Methane, ethylene, propane and hydrogen were used as the fuels in the surrounding co-flow stream while nitrogen and carbon dioxide were used as diluents. The experimental results show that the velocity of the surrounding stream affects the blowout phenomena significantly. An increase in the stream velocity has a detrimental effect on the blowout limits at very low velocities up to 0.30 m/s (essentially laminar flow) and at velocities higher than 1.50 m/s (turbulent flow). The addition of a fuel to the air stream in most cases enhances the blowout limit of a methane diffusion flame. However, different trends in the variation of the blowout limits with the surrounding fuel concentration were observed, depending on the type of fuel used and on whether the surrounding coflow stream was laminar or turbulent. The addition of nitrogen or carbon dioxide to the air stream results in decreasing the blowout limits. The effect is more severe at the higher velocities.


Author(s):  
Ya.M. Fridlyand ◽  
◽  
M.N. Kazantsev ◽  
F.V. Timofeev ◽  
S.N. Zamalaev ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
O.V. Aralov ◽  
◽  
I.V. Buyanov ◽  
E.V. Sayko ◽  
S.I. Vyunov ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vladislav N. Slepnev ◽  
◽  
Alexander F. Maksimenko ◽  
Elena V. Glebova ◽  
Alla Т. Volokhina ◽  
...  

The choice of risk assessment procedure is one of the essential stages of efficient structuring of processes on prevention, localization and elimination of the consequences of accidents at main pipeline transport facilities. The authors analyzed themed publications and regulatory documents, governing procedures of risk assessment and forecasting of the consequences of possible accidents, and defined main problems in this area. Procedure for the risk assessment of accidents at main pipeline facilities was developed, the basis of which is the expert evaluation method. The procedure includes the determination of the main criteria for the assessment the probability of accident initiation and development and the evaluation of the severity of its consequences, an expert evaluation of criteria significance, their classification, and creation of a rating for hazardous pipeline sections. The application of the procedure application allows to specify the list of facilities that require high priority forecasting of accidents consequences, thus to optimize the distribution of resources and the overall increase of efficiency in planning while defining forces and special technical devices, necessary for containment and rectification of emergencies. Expert evaluation method application allows considering the specifics of certain enterprises, their technical and technological peculiarities, thereby increasing forecasting accuracy.


Author(s):  
Andrey V. Zakharchenko ◽  
◽  
Alexander E. Gonchar ◽  
Roman Y. Shestakov ◽  
Polina V. Pugacheva ◽  
...  

The procedure for action in cases of a threat or an accident at oil pipeline transport facilities is defined in the relevant plans for emergency spillage prevention and response – ESPR. The purpose of the article is to analyze the requirements of the legislation in the field of development and approval of ESPR. The specifics of ESRP development at trunk pipeline facilities in Russia are noted, the US experience in combating oil and oil products spillage is presented. The problematic issues in the development and approval of ESRP, relevant for the domestic system of main oil pipeline transport, have been considered. It was established that the Federal Law No. 207-FL, adopted in July 2020, fundamentally changed the outdated and required revision approach to the coordination and approval of ESRP. At the same time, further work is needed to create a regulatory framework that establishes requirements for ESRP, as well as to improve ESRP, taking into account modern methods of predicting accidents, identifying emergencies, risk-oriented approaches to planning measures to localize and eliminate accidents, the specifics of operating organizations.


Author(s):  
Denis A. Presnyakov ◽  
◽  
Nikolay A. Babenko ◽  
Alfred G. Mubarakshin ◽  
◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document