scholarly journals Predictive Value of the Intestinal Free Fatty Acid Binding Protein in Celiac Disease

Author(s):  
Pınar GÖKÇEN ◽  
Erol ÇAKMAK ◽  
Gupse ADALI ◽  
Halef DOGAN ◽  
Hatice ÖZER ◽  
...  
Apmis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene B. Oldenburger ◽  
Victorien M. Wolters ◽  
Tineke Kardol-Hoefnagel ◽  
Roderick H. J. Houwen ◽  
Henny G. Otten

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yani Lina ◽  
Gatot Susilo Lawrence ◽  
Andi Wijaya

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity has increased dramatically in recent years. It is commonly associated with type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, and hypertension. White adipose tissue (WAT) is a major site of energy storage and is important for energy homeostasis. WAT has been increasingly recognized as an important endocrine organ that secretes a number of biologically active “adipokines”. The resultant higher FFA, FABP4, FABP5 concentration; and lower concentration of adiponectin is known to be correlated with inflammation. The aim of this study was to observe the correlation between FFA, FABP4, FABP5 and adiponectin with TNF-α and Interleukin-6 as markers of inflammation.METHOD: The study was observational with a cross sectional design. The analysis was done on 69 male subjects aged 30-60 years with non diabetic abdominal obesity which is characterized by waist circumference (WC) 98.7±6.5 cm and fasting blood glucose 87.1±9.7 mg/dL. FFA testing was performed by enzymatic colorimetric assay; whereas FABP4, FABP5, TNF-α, adiponectin and IL-6 were performed by ELISA. All statistical calculations were performed with the SPSS 11.5 statistical software package. We used the Pearson or Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient to assess the correlation between various anthropometric and biochemical measures. We also used path analysis Lisrel 8.30 for Windows.RESULT: This study revealed that there was no correlation between FFA, FABP4 and adiponectin with TNF-α and Interleukin-6, whereas there was correlation between FABP5 with TNF- and Interleukin-6. This study also showed there were correlations between WC and hsCRP (r=0.314, p=0.000), WC and IL-6 (r=0.276, p=0.022), FFA and FABP4 (r=0.263, p=0.029), FABP4 and WC (r=0.249, p =0.039), FABP4 and BMI (r=0.311, p=0.009), FABP5 and TNF- (r=0.408, p=0.000), FABP5 and FABP4 (r=0.296, p=0.014), FABP5 and Interleukin-6 (r=0.248, p=0.04), Adiponectin and HDL-Cholesterol (r=0.301, p=0.012).CONCLUSION: Abdominal obesity might contribute to inflammation in obese nondiabetic males. This study indicated that in abdominal obesity, FFA may induce inflammation through FABP4 and FABP5. Advancing our understanding of the function and measurement of FABP4 and FABP5 serum concentration will give insight into the clinical diagnosis of obesity-related metabolic disorders.KEYWORDS: Obesity, Waist Circumference, Free Fatty Acid (FFA), Fatty Acid Binding Protein (FABP), Adiponectin, TNF-α, Interleukin-6, Inflammation


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M.F. Claassens ◽  
Djura O. Coers ◽  
Thomas O. Bergmeijer ◽  
Dean R.P.P. Chan Pin Yin ◽  
Jurriën M. Ten Berg

Early recognition of myocardial infarction (MI) remains a challenge, especially in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation MI. Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (hFABP) has shown to be a more sensitive marker for myocardial necrosis as compared to non-high sensitive troponins (4th generation and older). However, since high sensitive troponin (hs TnT) assays are available, it is questionable whether hFABP still has value as a diagnostic tool for MI. A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase and Cochrane. After selecting the articles, they were assessed for risk of bias according to the QUADAS-2 criteria. Negative predictive value, positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity were extracted or calculated if possible. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, hs TnT showed higher sensitivity than hFABP, while hFABP had higher specificity. In patients presenting within 3 hours after onset of symptoms, sensitivity is low for both hFABP and hs TnT (19-63% vs 25-55%, respectively), while specificity seems higher for hFABP than for hs TnT (70-99% vs 57-86%, respectively). In these patients, the area under the curve for hs TnT is equal or better than that for hFABP (0.67-0.92 for hs TnT vs 0.69-0.85 for hFABP). The addition of hFABP to hs TnT did not improve sensitivity and specificity. This systematic review finds no advantage for using hFABP over hs TnT in either early presenting patients or overall. Furthermore, no advantage was found if a combination of hFABP and hs TnT was used for the diagnosis of MI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document