Psychiatrists Working in Primary Care: A Survey of General Practitioners' Attitudes

1996 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Barber ◽  
A. Sved Williams

Objectives: To collect information on current working arrangements between general practitioners (GPs) and mental health professionals and to assess GPs' attitudes towards developing closer working practices with psychiatrists in the primary care setting. Method: Six hundred and three GPs from South Australia were surveyed with questionnaires. Main outcome measures included information about existing primary care links between GPs and mental health professionals, GPs' preferred working arrangements with psychiatrists in the primary care setting and their attitude towards developing these practices, including perceived obstacles, advantages and disadvantages. Results: One hundred and eighty-one completed questionnaires were returned. One in 11 GPs returning the questionnaire (RGPs) had established primary care links with a psychiatrist, 1 in 6 with clinical psychologists and 1 in 17 with psychiatric nurses and social workers. RGPs held positive attitudes towards developing closer links at their work settings with psychiatrists when it leads to improved collaboration and access to psychiatrists. Reservations were expressed about the public weakening of the GPs' primary care role. Conclusions: The joint needs of clinical care and GPs' further training in psychiatry could be addressed by further development of schemes to attract psychiatrists to work in primary care settings. This is mostly viewed very positively by GPs, although the percentage of GPs responding make these conclusions tentative. It is more likely to occur with changes to current funding of both private psychiatric care and GP remuneration, with a recognition of time spent in liaison.

2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 897-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Issa Papiss Bagayogo ◽  
Katharina Turcios-Wiswe ◽  
Kanako Taku ◽  
Lauren Peccoralo ◽  
Craig L. Katz

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-264
Author(s):  
Tom Paterson ◽  
Christopher Seiboth ◽  
Barbara Magin ◽  
Rajan Nagesh ◽  
Cyndy Lloyd ◽  
...  

Objective: To describe a joint mental health project involving the Adelaide Northern Division of General Practice (ANDGP) and the North West Adelaide Mental Health Service (NWAMHS). Conclusions: This project has been developed to explore alternative strategies to facilitate the identification and management of patients with mental illness in the primary care setting. The project has also endeavoured to explore alternative types of psychiatrist/general practitioner interactions other than the conventional ‘general practitioner referred psychiatrist consultation’. The development of adequate and clinically relevant evaluation methods, both quantitative and qualitative, has also been an explicit objective of the project. While the project provides an exciting stimulus for ongoing development of models of Primary Psychiatric Care, it is evident that such models can only evolve in the context of significant service and systemic change. It is hoped that the experiences in the northern suburbs of Adelaide can stimulate others to explore the ongoing collaborations between psychiatric services and general practitioners in ways that can produce better mental health outcomes in our patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhukar Trivedi ◽  
Manish Jha ◽  
Farra Kahalnik ◽  
Ronny Pipes ◽  
Sara Levinson ◽  
...  

Major depressive disorder affects one in five adults in the United States. While practice guidelines recommend universal screening for depression in primary care settings, clinical outcomes suffer in the absence of optimal models to manage those who screen positive for depression. The current practice of employing additional mental health professionals perpetuates the assumption that primary care providers (PCP) cannot effectively manage depression, which is not feasible, due to the added costs and shortage of mental health professionals. We have extended our previous work, which demonstrated similar treatment outcomes for depression in primary care and psychiatric settings, using measurement-based care (MBC) by developing a model, called Primary Care First (PCP-First), that empowers PCPs to effectively manage depression in their patients. This model incorporates health information technology tools, through an electronic health records (EHR) integrated web-application and facilitates the following five components: (1) Screening (2) diagnosis (3) treatment selection (4) treatment implementation and (5) treatment revision. We have implemented this model as part of a quality improvement project, called VitalSign6, and will measure its success using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. In this report, we provide the background and rationale of the PCP-First model and the operationalization of VitalSign6 project.


2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 461-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin S. Vickers ◽  
Jennifer L. Ridgeway ◽  
Julie C. Hathaway ◽  
Jason S. Egginton ◽  
Angela B. Kaderlik ◽  
...  

Cephalalgia ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 908-915 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Zielman ◽  
PJL Veenstra ◽  
EW van Zwet ◽  
JSP van den Berg

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacological treatment of migraine patients by general practitioners before referral to a neurologist. First, was the pharmacological treatment in accordance with the Dutch College of General Practitioners headache guideline? Second, which migraine characteristics were associated with receiving migraine-specific medication? Methods: Migraine patients (age ≥18 years) who visited the neurology outpatient clinic for the first time were included. Migraine characteristics and pharmacological status were collected retrospectively for each patient from the general practitioner’s referral letter, hospital record and a headache characteristics questionnaire. Results: A total of 420 migraine patients were included. Only 18.3% of the patients with two or more migraine attacks per month were using prophylactic medication. Furthermore, only 11.7% of patients with symptoms of nausea and/or vomiting were using anti-emetic medication. More than half of patients (51.7%) were using triptans and were likely to have typical migraine symptoms and a long history of migraine. Conclusions: Migraine prophylactic medication and anti-emetics are underutilized in the primary care setting for migraine patients in the Netherlands, when compared to the general practitioners guideline. It is important to enhance the knowledge of general practitioners regarding the diagnosis of migraine, and to increase awareness of the headache guideline.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document