Epidemiology of Reflux Disease and Reflux Esophagitis

1989 ◽  
Vol 24 (sup156) ◽  
pp. 7-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wienbeck ◽  
J. Babnert
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 3007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsushige Sugimoto ◽  
Masaki Murata ◽  
Hitomi Mizuno ◽  
Eri Iwata ◽  
Naoyoshi Nagata ◽  
...  

Backgrounds: The etiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) including reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease is multifactorial and a recent meta-analysis showed no association between the development of GERD and Helicobacter pylori eradication in both Western and East-Asian populations. However, the problem remains that various inclusion criteria are used in these studies, which hinders meta-analysis. With a focus on reflux esophagitis with endoscopic mucosal injury, we meta-analysed to evaluate the association between eradication and reflux esophagitis and symptoms using a clearly defined set of inclusion criteria. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of studies published up until March 2020, which compared the incidence of reflux esophagitis and symptoms between patients undergoing H. pylori eradication therapy in a randomized placebo-controlled trial (Category A); between patients with successful and failed eradication (Category B); and between patients with successful vs. failed eradication, receipt of placebo, or no-treatment H. pylori-positives (Category C). Results: A total of 27 studies were included. Significant statistical effects were found for development of endoscopic reflux esophagitis [relative risk (RR): 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16–1.84, p = 0.01] or de novo reflux esophagitis (RR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.01–2.00, p = 0.03) in the case group that received eradication in all studies, especially in Western populations. There was no significant difference in the incidence of symptoms after eradication between patient and control groups, regardless of category, location of population, or baseline disease. Conclusions: Eradication therapy for H pylori increases the risk of reflux esophagitis, irrespective of past history of esophagitis. In contrast, no effect was seen on reflux-related symptoms.


2009 ◽  
Vol 136 (5) ◽  
pp. A-447
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Shida ◽  
Yuzo Sakai ◽  
Hiroyuki Hamada ◽  
Tetsuo Takayama

Author(s):  
Robin Moiseff ◽  
Nicholas Olson ◽  
Arief A. Suriawinata ◽  
Richard I. Rothstein ◽  
Mikhail Lisovsky

Context.— Published reports have suggested an association of lymphocytic esophagitis (LyE) with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and primary motility disorders and have also shown that GERD and motility disorders frequently overlap. These findings make it difficult to determine the true relationship between LyE and GERD, which may be confounded by the presence of motility disorders with LyE. Objective.— To characterize patterns of lymphocytic inflammation in patients with GERD that have no motility abnormalities. Design.— We identified 161 patients seen at our institution from 1998 to 2014, who were diagnosed with GERD, had normal esophageal motility, and available esophageal biopsies. LyE was defined as peripapillary lymphocytosis with rare or absent granulocytes. CD4 and CD8 immunophenotype of lymphocytes was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Results.— We found increased intraepithelial lymphocytes in 13.7% of patients with GERD. Two major patterns and 1 minor pattern of lymphocytic inflammation were observed as follows: (1) LyE (in 6.8% [11 of 161] of patients and typically focal), (2) dispersed lymphocytes in an area of reflux esophagitis (in 5.6% [9 of 161] and typically diffuse), and (3) peripapillary lymphocytes in an area of reflux esophagitis (in 1.2% [2 of 161]). CD8 T cells significantly outnumbered CD4 T cells in 91% of patients with lymphocytic esophagitis and 100% of patients with dispersed lymphocytes (9 of 9) or peripapillary lymphocytes (2 of 2) in the area of reflux esophagitis. Conclusions.— These findings suggest that LyE is one of the major patterns of lymphocytic inflammation in GERD. CD8 T-cell–predominant immunophenotype may be useful as a marker of GERD in the differential diagnosis of LyE.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 366-372
Author(s):  
I.V. Matoshina ◽  
◽  
M.A. Livzan ◽  
M.M. Fedorin ◽  
I.V. Lapteva ◽  
...  

Aim: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and an esophagoprotector to relieve the symptoms of reflux esophagitis, improve the life quality of patients and achieve faster and complete disease remission. Patients and Methods: a randomized study included 60 patients, including 33 men (mean age 40.96±13.44 years) and 27 women (mean age 48.29±12.69 years) with a duration of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) of 21.85±15.48 months and C/D stage of reflux esophagitis. Depending on the prescribed treatment, the patients were divided into 2 groups of 30 subjects. Patients of the main group received complex therapy: PPI pantoprazole 40 mg once per day and esophagoprotector based on hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and poloxamer 407. In the comparison group, only pantoprazole was prescribed at the same dosage. The duration of the treatment course in both groups was 4 weeks. Before and after treatment, the presence and severity of complaints were assessed on the Likert scale, life quality according to the SF-36 questionnaire and endoscopic examination data. Results: after the end of the therapy course, a statistically significant decrease in the severity of epigastric burning, regurgitation, substernal pain, gaseous eructation, odynophagia and dysphagia was found both in the main group (in all cases p<0.05, Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Test) and the comparison group (in all cases p<0,05, Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Test). The use of combination therapy made it possible to achieve a more significant improvement in the life quality of patients in all indicators versus PPI monotherapy. In addition, 3 (10%) patients of the main group achieved endoscopic remission, while there were no such patients in the comparison group. The use of esophagoprotector in addition to PPI made it possible to reach the primary and secondary endpoints significantly more commonly versus during monotherapy. Conclusion: the obtained data indicate the high efficiency and safety of PPI therapy in combination with esophagoprotector for relieving the disease symptoms and improving the life quality of patients, faster and complete remission of reflux esophagitis by additional restoration of the esophageal mucosa resistance. Esophagoprotector as a component of complex therapy together with PPI allows achieving clinical and endoscopic disease remission in patients with erosive esophagitis in shorter terms. KEYWORDS: gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophageal mucosa resistance, esophagoprotection, proton pump inhibitor, quality of life. FOR CITATION: Matoshina I.V., Livzan M.A., Fedorin M.M., Lapteva I.V. Efficacy of combined therapy in patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2021;5(6):366–372 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-6-366-372.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document