New applicator improves waterjet dissection quality

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 641-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph A. Tschan ◽  
Konrad Tschan ◽  
Joachim K. Krauss ◽  
Joachim Oertel
Keyword(s):  
2004 ◽  
Vol 146 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Oertel ◽  
M. R. Gaab ◽  
T. Schiller ◽  
H. W. S. Schroeder ◽  
R. Warzok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. ons368-ons376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph A. Tschan ◽  
Doerthe Keiner ◽  
Harald D. Müller ◽  
Kerstin Schwabe ◽  
Michael R. Gaab ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Although waterjet dissection has been well evaluated in intracranial pathologies, little is known of its qualities in peripheral nerve surgery. Theoretically, the precise dissection qualities could support the separation of nerves from adjacent tissues and improve the preservation of nerve integrity in peripheral nerve surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential of the new waterjet dissector in peripheral nerve surgery. METHODS: Waterjet dissection with pressures of 20 to 80 bar was applied on the sciatic nerves of 101 rats. The effect of waterjet dissection on the sciatic nerve was evaluated by clinical tests, neurophysiological examinations, and histopathological studies up to 12 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: With waterjet pressures up to 30 bar, the sciatic nerve was preserved in its integrity in all cases. Functional damaging was observed at pressures of 40 bar and higher. However, all but 1 rat in the 80 bar subgroup showed complete functional regeneration at 12 weeks after surgery. Histopathologically, small water bubbles were observed around the nerves. At 40 bar and higher, the sciatic nerves showed signs of direct nerve injury. However, all these animals showed nerve regeneration after 12 weeks, as demonstrated by histological studies. CONCLUSION: Sciatic nerves were preserved functionally and morphologically at pressures up to 30 bar. Between 40 and 80 bar, reliable functional and morphological nerve regeneration occurred. Waterjet pressures up to 30 bar might be applied safely under clinical conditions. This technique might be well suited to separate intact peripheral nerves from adjacent tumor or scar tissue. Further studies will have to show the clinical relevance of these dissection qualities.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 17-22
Author(s):  
D. V. Sidorov ◽  
M. V. Lozhkin ◽  
L. O. Petrov ◽  
N. A. Grishin ◽  
A. A. Troitskiy ◽  
...  

Urologiia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1_2017 ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.V. Glybochko Glybochko ◽  
Yu.G. Alyaev Alyaev ◽  
L.M. Rapoport Rapoport ◽  
N.A. Grigor’ev Grigor’ev ◽  
E.A. Bezrukov Bezrukov ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 677-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengqiang Yu ◽  
Zhenli Gao ◽  
Chunhua Lin ◽  
Xizhi Sun ◽  
Changping Men ◽  
...  

Abstract Hilar clamping is typically used in partial nephrectomy to control hemorrhage, which may damage the renal tissue under warm ischemia conditions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate waterjet technology in partial nephrectomy without renal hilar vascular control in a porcine model. Bilateral partial nephrectomy using waterjet was performed in 8 pigs (16 kidneys: 8 for wedge resections, 8 for pole resections). The operations were performed successfully in all animals. The mean dissection time was 30.6 ± 2.9 minutes for pole resections and 36.5 ± 3.5 minutes for wedge resections. The mean blood loss was 51.6 ± 11.7 mL for pole resections and 38.7 ± 9.2 mL for wedge resections. The novel waterjet technique provided precise and effective hydrodissection of the kidney, avoiding damage to the vascular structures or collecting system.


2005 ◽  
Vol 56 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. ONS-142-ONS-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Oertel ◽  
Michael Robert Gaab ◽  
Uwe Runge ◽  
Henry Werner Siegfried Schroeder ◽  
Juergen Piek

Abstract OBJECTIVE: Waterjet dissection is currently under close investigation in neurosurgery. Experimentally, precise brain parenchyma dissection with vessel preservation has been demonstrated. Clinically, the safety of the instrument has already been proved. However, precise data demonstrating that waterjet dissection indeed reduces surgical blood loss are still missing. METHODS: The authors applied the waterjet device in a prospective randomized study in comparison with the ultrasonic aspirator. Because there is little variability in the procedure, 30 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy receiving a tailored temporal lobe resection between December 1999 and October 2002 were selected for this study. Intraoperative vessel preservation, intraoperative blood loss, surgical complications, and epilepsy outcome were evaluated. All patients were followed at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: During surgery, both instruments were easy to handle. Only with the waterjet dissector, however, were even small intraparenchymal blood vessels preserved. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced with the waterjet (mean, 70 ± 46 ml) compared with the ultrasonic aspirator (mean, 121 ± 48 ml). However, no difference in the necessity for blood transfusion occurred. No difference was observed with respect to operation time (238.6 ± 37.0 min with the waterjet, 247.5 ± 41.5 min with the ultrasonic aspirator), surgical complications, and outcome. CONCLUSION: The waterjet dissector enables a significant reduction of intraoperative blood loss in the investigated setting. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results with a larger number of patients. Studies also are needed to prove that the reduction of blood loss is of clinical relevance for the outcome of the patients.


2002 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 690-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juergen Piek ◽  
Joachim Oertel ◽  
Michael Robert Gaab

Object. Waterjet dissection represents a new minimally traumatic surgical method for dissection that can be used in various parenchymal organs, in which it allows highly precise parenchymal dissection while preserving blood vessels, resulting in reduced intraoperative blood loss. This study was performed to investigate the clinical application of this new technique in neurosurgical procedures, such as brain tumor resection and epilepsy surgery. Methods. Thirty-four patients with gliomas (Grades II–IV), cerebral metastases, temporal lobe epilepsy, or cerebellar hemangioblastomas, and one patient with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis were treated surgically with the aid of the waterjet. Resection was performed using waterjet dissection in combination with conventional neurosurgical procedures. Intraoperatively, the waterjet was easy to handle, and no complications due to the device were observed. Dissection of tissue was possible for all pathological conditions, and pressures between 3 and 45 bars were used. In gliomas, metastases, epilepsy surgery, and hemangioblastoma, the tissue was dissected at pressures between 3 and 17 bars, which preserved blood vessels. Dissection of meningiomas and the ICA stenosis required higher pressures (between 20 and 45 bars); with these pressures, blood vessels were also dissected. Conclusions. These results indicate that the waterjet dissection procedure can be used intraoperatively without complications. This device appears to be particularly suitable for the dissection of highly vascularized gliomas or normal brain tissue, in which tissue dissection with sparing of blood vessels can be achieved. To prove that this is a useful addition to the neurosurgical armamentarium, reduction of blood loss or postoperative brain edema compared with conventional methods should be demonstrated in future studies.


2004 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 498-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Oertel ◽  
Michael Robert Gaab ◽  
Dirk-Thomas Pillich ◽  
Henry W. S. Schroeder ◽  
Rolf Warzok ◽  
...  

Object. The waterjet method of dissection has been shown to enable the precise dissection of the parenchyma vessels while preserving blood in cadaveric pig brains. The waterjet device has also been applied clinically to treat various diseases and disorders without complications. Evidence still remains to be gathered as to how the instrument performs in reducing surgical trauma, intraoperative blood loss, and postsurgical brain edema. In the present study the authors investigate these parameters in a comparison between waterjet dissection and ultrasonic aspiration in the rabbit brain in vivo. Methods. Thirty-one rabbits received identical bilateral frontal corticotomies, which were created using the waterjet device or an ultrasonic aspirator. The animals were killed 1, 3, or 7 days, or 6 weeks after surgery and their brains were processed for immunohistological analysis. Blood vessel preservation, intraoperative hemorrhage, postsurgical brain edema, and posttraumatic microglial and astoglial reactions were evaluated. Only in animals subjected to waterjet dissection were preserved vessels observed within the corticotomies. In addition, less intraoperative bleeding occurred in animals in which the waterjet was used. The microglial reaction was significantly reduced by waterjet dissection compared with ultrasonic aspiration; however, no difference in edema formation or astrocytic reactivity was observed. Conclusions. These results demonstrate that waterjet dissection appears to be less traumatic than ultrasonic aspiration with respect to intraoperative hemorrhage and postoperative microglial reactivity in the rabbit model. Nevertheless, no difference in edema formation could be demonstrated. It remains to be proven that the observed differences are of clinical relevance.


1998 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 861-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Piek ◽  
Christian Wille ◽  
Rolf Warzok ◽  
Michael-Robert Gaab

✓ Control of bleeding during dissection is a problem that is still not completely resolved in neurosurgical procedures. To overcome this problem in some settings, the authors, in close collaboration with their institution, developed a new device for blunt dissection of brain tumors that is based on a waterjet technique. This report describes their first experimental and clinical experience with this new method. Numerous cutting experiments were performed in porcine cadaver brains. The best results were obtained using pressures from 4 to 6 bars with a 100-jxm tip, which produced very small, precise cuts. Histological evaluation showed no disruption or vacuolization of the surrounding tissue. The authors have used the new device in nine patients (seven with gliomas and two undergoing temporal lobe resections for epilepsy), and no complications have been observed. The waterjet device allowed dissection of the brain tissue while even small exposed vessels were spared injury. The instrument was found to be easy to use. Future investigations will concentrate on adapting this new method to endoscopic surgery and evaluating fluids with low surface tension to avoid foaming and bubbling during open surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document