scholarly journals Prosthetic use and functional and social outcome following major lower limb amputation

1990 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Pohjolainen ◽  
H. Alaranta ◽  
M. Kärkäinen
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Lower Limb Amputation ◽  
Social Adaptation ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
Personal Contact ◽  
Social Outcome ◽  
Home Help ◽  
Prosthetic Fitting ◽  
One Year ◽  
Old People's Homes

A total of 175 consecutive below and above-knee amputees sent to the prosthetic workshop in Helsinki for prosthetic fitting from 32 hospitals were reviewed to determine their functional ambulation and social adaptation. The average age of the patients was 62.2 years at the time of the prosthetic fitting. The mortality was 11% (19) during the first postoperative year. One-year postoperative information was obtained for 141 of the surviving patients (90%) by personal contact. At the time of the review, 68% of the amputees (96 patients) who had been fitted with a prosthesis made extensive and regular use of it. Half of all the above-knee amputees and 79% of the below-knee amputees used their prosthesis throughout the day or over seven hours a day. A total of 72% of the above-knee amputees (33/ 46) and 85% of the below-knee amputees (67/ 79) had useful ambulation, at least indoors. Of the 141 patients contacted, 124 (88%) lived in their own homes. The remaining 16 patients (11%) lived in apartment houses for the aged or old people's homes, A total of 48 amputees (34%) needed a regular home help.

scholarly journals Factors that affect the one-year mortality rate after lower limb amputation in the Hong Kong Chinese population

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 221049172110569
Author(s):  
Pui M Chung ◽  
Bolton KH Chau ◽  
Esther C-S Chow ◽  
Kwok H Lam ◽  
Nang MR Wong
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Chinese Population ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Lower Limb Amputation ◽  
Hong Kong Chinese ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
One Year ◽  
The One

Introduction Lower limb amputation has significant morbidity and mortality. This study reviews the potential factors affecting the one-year mortality rate after lower limb amputation in the Hong Kong Chinese population. Methods Cases with lower limb amputations (toe, ray, below-knee, and above-knee amputations) from a regional hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 were recruited. Amputations due to trauma were excluded. The one-year mortality rate and the potential risk factors (age, sex, length-of-stay, multiple operations, extent of surgery (minor vs. major), medical comorbidities including (1) end-stage renal failure (ESRF), (2) cardiac diseases, (3) ischemic heart disease, (4) peripheral vascular disease and (5) diabetes mellitus) were analyzed by multiple logistic regression using Matlab 2018a. Results A total of 132 patients were recruited (173 operations). The one-year mortality rate was 36.3%. The mean age at death was 72.2 years. The results of the regression analysis showed patients having ESRF (β = 2.195, t 120 = 3.008, p = 0.003) or a major amputation (including above- or below-knee amputation) (β = 1.079, t 120 = 2.120, p = 0.034), had a significantly higher one-year mortality. The remaining factors showed no significant effect. The one-year mortality rate in ESRF patients was 77.8%; while the one-year mortality rate without ESRF was 29.8%. The mean age at death in the ESRF group was 62.9 years; while that without ESRF was 76.1 years. The one-year mortality for patients with major amputation was 45.8% while that for minor amputation was 20.4%. Conclusion ESRF and major amputation are factors that increase the one-year mortality rate after lower limb amputation.

scholarly journals Prosthetic fitting, use, and satisfaction following lower-limb amputation: A prospective study

2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph B. Webster ◽  
Kevin N. Hakimi ◽  
Rhonda M. Williams ◽  
Aaron P. Turner ◽  
Daniel C. Norvell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Lower Limb Amputation ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
Prosthetic Fitting ◽  
A Prospective Study

scholarly journals Vocational reintegration after a lower limb amputation: A qualitative study

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bruins ◽  
J. H. B. Geertzen ◽  
J. W. Groothoff ◽  
T. Schoppen
Keyword(s):  
Return To Work ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Qualitative Methodology ◽  
Lower Limb Amputation ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Negative Experiences ◽  
Work Tasks ◽  
One Year ◽  
Mean Time

The objectives of this study were to describe the process of job reintegration, to obtain more detailed information about workplace adjustments, and to assess the positive and negative experiences of amputees (in the Netherlands) who returned to paid work after their lower limb amputation. The study had a retrospective design with semi-structured interviews. The authors used a qualitative methodology to obtain detailed information on the reintegration process. Thirty-two (32) subjects participated with a mean age of 42.6 years. The mean time between amputation and return to work was nearly one year (11.5 months). The most common reasons for delay in return to work were stump problems and problems in wound healing. Fifty percent (50%) of the amputees got different work tasks or another job than before amputation, mainly because of physical restrictions caused by the amputation. The most important motives of the amputees for job reintegration were work as a form of day spending (69%) and social contacts at the workplace (66%). Bad support of the implementing body which takes care of job reintegration and employer (34%) were the most mentioned obstacle to job reintegration. Vocational workers should be regular members in the rehabilitation teams for amputees.

A One-year National Survey of Patients Having a Lower Limb Amputation

Physiotherapy ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
E CONDIE ◽  
D JONES ◽  
S TREWEEK ◽  
H SCOTT
Keyword(s):  
National Survey ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Lower Limb Amputation ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals P90 PERCEIVE: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaboratIVE study

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Gwilym ◽  
C Waldron ◽  
E Thomas-Jones ◽  
P Pallmann ◽  
R Preece ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Prediction ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Lower Limb Amputation ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
Prediction Tools

Abstract Introduction Major Lower Limb Amputation (MLLA) is a life changing event with significant morbidity and mortality. Inaccurate risk prediction can lead to poor decision making, resulting in delay to definitive surgery, or undertaking amputation when not in the patient’s best interest. We aim to answer: In adult patients undergoing MLLA for chronic limb threatening ischaemia or diabetes, how accurately do health care professionals prospectively predict outcomes after MLLA, and how does this compare to existing prediction tools? Methods A multicentre prospective observational cohort study is being delivered through the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network. Dissemination was via an existing network of contacts and social media. Consecutive data will be collected for seven months from site launch date, including demographic data and pre-operative outcome predictions from surgeons, anaesthetists, and allied healthcare professionals. Follow-up data will comprise 30-day (mortality, morbidity, MLLA revision, surgical site infection, and blood transfusion) and 1-year (mortality, MLLA revision and ambulation). The accuracy of surgeons’ predictions will be evaluated and compared to pre-existing risk prediction scoring tools. Results PERCEIVE launched on 01/10/2020 with 23 centres (16 UK, 7 international) registered to collect data. 50 other centres (27 UK, 23 international) have expressed interest/are pursuing local audit/ethical approval. We aim to collect data on clinicians estimate of outcomes for over 500 patients. Discussion This study will utilise a trainee research network to provide data on the accuracy of healthcare professionals’ predictions of outcomes following MLLA and compare this to the utility of existing prediction tools in this patient cohort.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document