Adaptação transcultural do Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO) para aplicação no Brasil

Objetivo: A restrição na participação é uma consequência significativa para indivíduos pós-Acidente Vascular Cerebral (AVC). No Brasil, não há instrumentos disponíveis que contemplem de forma abrangente a participação nesta população. Portanto, o objetivo deste estudo foi adaptar transculturalmente o Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome(SIPSO) para uso no Brasil. O SIPSO é um questionário com 10 itens, abrangendo questões de participação consideradas significativas para indivíduos pós-AVC. Métodos: O processo de adaptação transcultural envolveu as seguintes etapas: tradução, retrotradução, síntese das traduções, análise por um comitê de especialistas e teste da versão pré-final. Resultados: Observou-se equivalência semântica adequada entre as versões original e retrotraduzida. Durante a reunião de especialistas, foi realizada adequação dos itens às regras gramaticais da língua portuguesa. No teste da versão pré-final, em um item do instrumento foi reportada dificuldade de compreensão, sendo acrescentado um exemplo para ampliar a possibilidade de compreensão do item. Conclusão: O SIPSO-Brasil apresentou satisfatório grau de equivalência semântica, idiomática, cultural, conceitual e operacional. Contudo, estudos posteriores devem ser realizados para a continuidade da investigação da validade da versão adaptada do instrumento.

A mixed methods exploration of the role of multi-family groups in community treatment of patients with depression and anxiety in Pakistan

Background An open, non-controlled trial was conducted to explore the feasibility, experiences and outcomes of multi-family groups in community mental health care of patients with depression and anxiety. Methods The study was conducted in community settings within the catchment area of a free of cost primary care center in Karachi, Pakistan. 30 patients with symptoms of depression and anxiety, their caregivers and 3 lay counsellors were recruited enrolled in the study between May–September 2019. Patients were enrolled for monthly multi-family group meetings conducted over 6 months in groups of 5–6 patients and 1–2 nominated caregivers each. Meetings were facilitated by the non-specialist trained counsellors. The primary outcome was quality of life (assessed using Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life) and secondary outcomes were symptoms of depression and anxiety (assessed on Aga Khan University Depression and Anxiety Scale), social outcomes (Social Outcome Index), and caregiver burden (Burden Assessment Scale). Change in all measures was assessed pre and 6-month post intervention using t-test. In-depth interviews were conducted with 7 patients, 7 caregivers and the 3 lay counsellors. Results A total of 36 family intervention meetings were conducted with six groups with a total of 30 patients, 34 caregivers and 3 counsellors. Between baseline and the end of the intervention, subjective quality of life increased significantly from 3.34 to 4.58 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.93–1.54). Self-reported depression and anxiety scores reduced from 34.7 to 19.5 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 10.8–19.8) and the Social Outcome Index improved from 3.63 to 4.52 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.39–1.39). There was no change in family burden. Participants reported that the group meetings were seen as a safe space for shared learning, and that the experience helped improve self-regulation of emotions and behaviors and instilled a sense of belonging. Conclusion Multi-family groups in community treatment of common mental health disorders facilitated by non-specialist mental health service providers is feasible, experienced positively and has the potential for large and positive effects on subjective quality of life, self-reported depression and anxiety, and objective social outcomes. Trial Registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN12299326. Registered 05 June 2019. Retrospectively registered, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12299326.

Approval voting without ballot restrictions

We axiomatically study voting rules without making any assumption on the ballots that voters are allowed to cast. In this setting, we characterize the family of “endorsement rules,” which includes approval voting and the plurality rule, via the imposition of three normative conditions. The first condition is the well known social‐theoretic principle of consistency; the second one, unbiasedness, roughly requires social outcomes not to be biased toward particular candidates or voters; the last one, dubbed no single voter overrides, demands that the addition of a voter to an electorate cannot radically change the social outcome. Building on this result, we provide the first axiomatic characterization of approval voting without the approval balloting assumption. The informational basis of approval voting as well as its aggregative rationale are jointly derived from a set of conditions that can be defined on most of the ballot spaces studied in the literature.