Type and location of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations influence clinical characteristics and disease outcome of acute myeloid leukemia

2012 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 1028-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Koszarska ◽  
Andras Bors ◽  
Angela Feczko ◽  
Nora Meggyesi ◽  
Arpad Batai ◽  
...  
Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Brunner ◽  
Donna S. Neuberg ◽  
Seth A. Wander ◽  
Hossein Sadrzadeh ◽  
Karen K. Ballen ◽  
...  

Leukemia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1598-1604 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Jiao ◽  
C-F Wu ◽  
Y Liang ◽  
H-M Chen ◽  
S-M Xiong ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Liu ◽  
Yuping Gong

Abstract Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is a key enzyme involved in the conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. IDH mutation produces a neomorphic enzyme, which can lead to the abnormal accumulation of R-2-HG and promotes leukemogenesis. IDH mutation occurs in 20% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, mainly including IDH1 R132, IDH2 R140, and IDH2 R172. Different mutant isoforms have different prognostic values. In recent years, IDH inhibitors have shown good clinical response in AML patients. Hence, enasidenib and ivosidenib, the IDH2 and IDH1 inhibitors developed by Agios Pharmaceuticals, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration on 1 August 2017 and 20 July 2018 for the treatment of adult relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML with IDH2 and IDH1 mutations, respectively. IDH inhibitor monotherapy for R/R AML is efficacious and safe; however, there are problems, such as primary or acquired resistance. Clinical trials of IDH inhibitors combined with hypomethylating agents or standard chemotherapy for the treatment of R/R AML or newly diagnosed AML, as well as in post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as maintenance therapy, are ongoing. This article summarizes the use of IDH inhibitors in AML with IDH mutations.


Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahran Shoukier ◽  
Tapan Kadia ◽  
Marina Konopleva ◽  
Ahmad S. Alotaibi ◽  
Mansour Alfayez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-65
Author(s):  
Courtney D. DiNardo ◽  
Anthony S. Stein ◽  
Eytan M. Stein ◽  
Amir T. Fathi ◽  
Olga Frankfurt ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Ivosidenib is an oral inhibitor of the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) enzyme, approved for treatment of IDH1-mutant (m IDH1) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Preclinical work suggested that addition of azacitidine to ivosidenib enhances mIDH1 inhibition–related differentiation and apoptosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was an open-label, multicenter, phase Ib trial comprising dose-finding and expansion stages to evaluate safety and efficacy of combining oral ivosidenib 500 mg once daily continuously with subcutaneous azacitidine 75 mg/m2 on days 1-7 in 28-day cycles in patients with newly diagnosed m IDH1 AML ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02677922 ). RESULTS Twenty-three patients received ivosidenib plus azacitidine (median age, 76 years; range, 61-88 years). Treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurring in > 10% of patients were neutropenia (22%), anemia (13%), thrombocytopenia (13%), and electrocardiogram QT prolongation (13%). Adverse events of special interest included all-grade IDH differentiation syndrome (17%), all-grade electrocardiogram QT prolongation (26%), and grade ≥ 3 leukocytosis (9%). Median treatment duration was 15.1 months (range, 0.3-32.2 months); 10 patients remained on treatment as of February 19, 2019. The overall response rate was 78.3% (18/23 patients; 95% CI, 56.3% to 92.5%), and the complete remission rate was 60.9% (14/23 patients; 95% CI, 38.5% to 80.3%). With median follow-up of 16 months, median duration of response in responders had not been reached. The 12-month survival estimate was 82.0% (95% CI, 58.8% to 92.8%). m IDH1 clearance in bone marrow mononuclear cells by BEAMing (beads, emulsion, amplification, magnetics) digital polymerase chain reaction was seen in 10/14 patients (71.4%) achieving complete remission. CONCLUSION Ivosidenib plus azacitidine was well tolerated, with an expected safety profile consistent with monotherapy with each agent. Responses were deep and durable, with most complete responders achieving m IDH1 mutation clearance.


2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (16-17) ◽  
pp. 1362-1367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hellinida Thomadaki ◽  
Konstantinos V. Floros ◽  
Sonja Pavlovic ◽  
Natasa Tosic ◽  
Dimitrios Gourgiotis ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Willander ◽  
Ingrid Jakobsen Falk ◽  
Roza Chaireti ◽  
Esbjörn Paul ◽  
Monica Hermansson ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2368-2368
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Suzuki ◽  
Hitoshi Kiyoi ◽  
Kazutaka Ozeki ◽  
Akihiro Tomita ◽  
Ritsuro Suzuki ◽  
...  

Abstract Nucleophosmin (NPM) is a nucleolar protein with multi-functions including centromere duplication, nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling, ribosomal biogenesis, p53 stability. NPM1 mutations were found in a large number of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) especially with normal karyotype. The mutations lead to the aberrant subcellular localization of NPM protein. However, their impacts on clinical outcome remain controversial. We screened the mutations of NPM1 in 257 AML patients and analyzed the clinical significance. NPM1 mutations were found in 64 of 257 patients (24.9%). Seven types of mutations, including four novel mutations, were identified. NPM1 mutations were associated with normal karyotype, FLT3 mutations (both FLT3-ITD and D835 mutation) but not with other gene alterations such as N-RAS, p53 mutations and partial tandem duplication of the MLL gene. In 190 patients except the M3 subgroup, who were treated according to the protocol of Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group, the multivariate analysis revealed that NPM1 mutation was a favorable factor for achieving complete remission, but significantly associated with relapse. A sequential analysis, using paired samples obtained at diagnosis and relapse in 39 patients, revealed that NPM1 mutations were lost at relapse in 2 of the seventeen patients who had NPM1 mutations at diagnosis and none of the patients, who did not have NPM1 mutations at diagnosis, gained NPM1 mutations at relapse. Our results suggest that NPM-mutated AML should be a distinct subgroup with specific clinical characteristics and outcome. Loss of NPM mutations at relapse implies that NPM mutation is not necessarily a primary genetic alteration and that these leukemic clones could be sensitive to chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document