4 Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Isopropyl Linoleate

1992 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  

Isopropyl Linoleate is the ester of isopropyl alcohol and linoleic acid. In cosmetics, it is used as a skin conditioning agent and emollient at concentrations ranging from 0.1 % to 10.0%. In an acute oral toxicity study, none of the albino rabbits that received doses of 10.0% Isopropyl Linoleate in corn oil died. Isopropyl Linoleate (undiluted and 10.0% suspension) were classified as slight ocular irritants. Undiluted Isopropyl Linoleate was classified as a slight skin irritant. The report concludes that the safety of use of Isopropyl Linoleate has not been documented and substantiated, and that it is not possible to conclude that the ingredient is safe for use in cosmetic products. The report details the type of safety test data that is needed to substantiate the safety of use of Isopropyl Linoleate in cosmetic products.

1992 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  

Isopropyl Isostearate, the ester of isopropyl alcohol and isostearic acid, is used as a skin conditioning agent-emollient in cosmetic products. Undiluted Isopropyl Isostearate was classified as a slight ocular irritant. Repeated applications of a 10.0% aqueous suspension of Isopropyl Isostearate to the skin of albino rabbits was well-tolerated. Based upon the safety test data on chemically similar isopropyl esters that is summarized in the report, it is concluded that Isopropyl Isostearate is safe as a cosmetic ingredient in the present practices of use and concentration.


1983 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 75-86 ◽  

Potassium and TEA-Coco-Hydrolyzed Animal Proteins (PCHAP and TEA-CHAP) are salts of the condensation product of coconut acid and hydrolyzed animal protein. They are used in cosmetic products as detergents, foamers, and levelers. Acute oral toxicity studies showed that both PCHAP and TEA-CHAP were practically nontoxic when ingested. Both ingredients at concentrations of 10%-100% were practically nonirritating to moderately irritating when instilled in the eyes of rabbits. Both were nonirritating to mildly irritating when applied at concentrations of 10%-50% to the skin of rabbits. Guinea pig sensitization studies with both PCHAP and TEA-CHAP were negative. PCHAP and TEA-CHAP, at concentrations of 2% 10% were nonirritating to practically nonirritating in humans. In a repeated insult patch test, PCHAP gave a positive sensitization reaction in two of 168 subjects; two additional subjects showed cumulative irritation and one other was reported to have a nonspecific irritation. One subject out of 28 tested did not demonstrate significant irritation or sensitivity to either PCHAP or TEA-CHAP, but was photosensitized to both ingredients. On the basis of the available information, the Panel concludes that Potas-sium-Coco-Hydrolyzed Animal Protein and TEA-Coco-Hydrolyzed Animal Protein are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the present practices of use as recorded in this report.


1990 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  

Glycol Stearate, Glycol Stearate SE, and Glycol Distearate consist primarily of the mono- and diesters of triple-pressed stearic acid. They are used in numerous categories of cosmetic products at concentrations ranging from less than 0.1 to 10%. Animal data for acute oral toxicity, skin and eye irritation, and sensitization show that these ingredients have low acute toxicity. A repeated insult patch test with 50% Glycol Distearate on 125 subjects presented no evidence of skin irritation or hypersensitivity. Human studies using formulations containing Glycol Stearate at levels of 2-5% reported no skin irritation or sensitization. Subchronic testing has not been adequately investigated in laboratory animals. Human test data for formulations containing > 4% Glycol Stearate or Glycol Distearate should be considered. Based on the available information presented herein, it is concluded that Glycol Stearate, Glycol Stearate SE, and Glycol Distearate are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the present practices of use and concentration.


1991 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-101

Stearic Hydrazide is reported to be used in 17 cosmetic products at concentrations of use of less than 1.0%. Hydrazides and their salts are prohibited for use in cosmetic products by the European Economic Community. The report concludes that the safety of use of Stearic Hydrazide has not been documented and substantiated and that it is not possible to conclude that the ingredient is safe for use in cosmetic products. The report documents the types of safety test data that are needed to substantiate the safety of use of Stearic Hydrazide in cosmetic products.


1982 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  

The Laneths are ethoxylated lanolin alcohols that may be acetylated and used in a wide variety of cosmetic products. Acute oral toxicity studies indicate that Laneth-10 Acetate is relatively nontoxic to the rat; acute dermal toxicity studies indicate that it is relatively nontoxic to the guinea pig. Laneth-10 Acetate was found to be a mild, transient irritant to the rabbit's eye. Laneth-10 Acetate was shown to be nonirritating and nonsensitizing to SO subjects. Laneth-16 is slightly toxic when administered orally to the rat. Neither Laneth-16 nor Laneth-25 was a skin irritant or sensitizing agent in 50 subjects. On the basis of the available animal data and limited human experience presented in this report, it is concluded that the Laneths are safe for topical application to humans in the present practices of use and concentration.


1985 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  

Isostearyl Neopentanoate, the ester of Isostearyl Alcohol and Neopentanoic Acid, is used in cosmetic products as an emollient at concentrations up to 50 percent. The undiluted ingredient at doses up to 4 ml/kg was shown to be relatively non-toxic in short-and long-term feeding studies. Test data from animal and clinical studies indicate the undiluted ingredient is neither an irritant nor a sensitizer. A cosmetic formulation containing 16 percent Isostearyl Neopentanoate produced no phototoxicity and no photoallergenicity. Mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and teratogenicity data were not available. Isostearyl Neopentanoate was not considered to be a significant comedogenic agent. On the basis of available data, it is concluded that this ingredient is safe as a cosmetic ingredient in its present practices of use.


2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 61-94

Triesters of glycerin and aliphatic acids, known generically as glyceryl triesters and specifically as Trilaurin, etc., are used in cosmetic products as occlusive skin-conditioning agents and/or non-aqueous viscosity-increasing agents. Hundreds of glyceryl triesters are used in a wide variety of cosmetic products at concentrations ranging from a few tenths of a percent to 46%. Glyceryl triesters are also known as triglycerides; ingested triglycerides are metabolized to monoglycerides, free fatty acids, and glycerol, all of which are absorbed in the intestinal mucosa and undergo further metabolism. Dermal absorption of Triolein in mice was nil; the oil remained at the application site. Only slight absorption was seen in guinea pig skin. Tricaprylin and other glyceryl triesters have been shown to increase the skin penetration of drugs. Little or no acute, subchronic, or chronic oral toxicity was seen in animal studies unless levels approached a significant percentage of caloric intake. Subcutaneous injections of Tricaprylin in rats over a period of 5 weeks caused a granulomatous reaction characterized by oil deposits surrounded by macrophages. Dermal application was not associated with significant irritation in rabbit skin. Ocular exposures were, at most, mildly irritating to rabbit eyes. No evidence of sensitization or photosensitization was seen in a guinea pig maximization test. Most of the genotoxicity test systems were negative. Tricaprylin, Trioctanoin, and Triolein have historically been used as vehicles in carcinogenicity testing of other chemicals. In one study, subcutaneous injection of Tricaprylin in newborn mice produced more tumors in lymphoid tissue than were seen in untreated animals, whereas neither subcutaneous or intraperitoneal injection in 4-to 6-week-old female mice produced any tumors in another study. Trioctanoin injected subcutaneously in hamsters produced no tumors. Trioctanoin injected intraperitoneally in pregnant rats was associated with an increase in mammary tumors in the offspring compared to that seen in offspring of untreated animals, but similar studies in pregnant hamsters and rabbits showed no tumors in the offspring. One study of Triolein injected subcutaneously in rats showed no tumors at the injection site. As part of an effort to evaluate vehicles used in carcinogenicity studies, the National Toxicology Program conducted a 2-year carcinogenicity study in rats given Tricaprylin by gavage. This treatment was associated with a statistically significant dose-related increase in pancreatic acinar cell hyperplasia and adenoma, but there were no acinar carcinomas, the incidence of mononuclear leukemia was less, and nephropathy findings were reduced, all compared to corn oil controls. Overall, the study concluded that Tricaprylin did not offer significant advantages over corn oil as vehicles in carcinogenicity studies. Trilaurin was found to inhibit the formation of neoplasms initiated by dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA) and promoted by croton oil. Tricaprylin was not teratogenic in mice or rats, but some reproductive effects were seen in rabbits. A low level of fetal eye abnormalities and a small percentage of abnormal sperm were reported in mice injected with Trioctanoin as a vehicle control. Clinical tests of Trilaurin at 36.3% in a commercial product applied to the skin produced no irritation reactions. Trilaurin, Tristearin, and Tribehenin at 40%, 1.68%, and 0.38%, respectively, in commercial products were also negative in repeated-insult patch tests. Tristearin at 0.32% in a commercial product induced transient, mild to moderate, ocular irritation after instillation into the eyes of human subjects. Based on the enhancement of penetration of other chemicals by skin treatment with glyceryl triesters, it is recommended that care be exercised in using them in cosmetic products. On the basis of the available data, the following 23 glyceryl triesters are considered safe as used in cosmetics: Trilaurin, Triarachidin, Tribehenin, Tricaprin, Tricaprylin, Trierucin, Triheptanoin, Triheptylundecanoin, Triisononanoin, Triisopalmitin, Triisostearin, Trilinolein, Trimyristin, Trioctanoin, Triolein, Tripalmitin, Tripalmitolein, Triricinolein, Tristearin, Triundecanoin, Glyceryl Triacetyl Hydroxystearate, Glyceryl Triacetyl Ricinoleate, and Glyceryl Stearate Diacetate. Some of these are not currently in use, but would be considered safe if used at concentrations similar to those glyceryl triesters that are in use as cosmetic ingredients.


1992 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-41 ◽  

Dilauryl Thiodipropionate (DLTDP) is the diester of lauryl alcohol and 3,3′-thiodipro-pionic acid which is used as an antioxidant and sequestering agent in cosmetics at concentrations up to 1%. When administered orally to rats and mice, DLTDP was slightly toxic and was relatively nontoxic in subchronic oral studies with rats. No irritation was produced by a formulation containing 0.05% DLTDP when tested at 0.0025% on intact and abraded skin. DLTDP was nonmutagenic in four different assay systems. This cosmetic ingredient was not a teratogen or reproductive toxicant in oral studies in mice, rats, hamsters or rabbits. A formulation containing 0.05% DLTDP when tested at 0.05% was not a sensitizer in a guinea pig maximization test. DLTDP, at a concentration of 0.05% in a makeup foundation, was not an irritant, sensitizer, or phototoxin when tested on human volunteers. The maximum reported safety test concentration used in dermal toxicity of DLTDP was 0.05%. The report limits its safety conclusion by concluding that DLTDP is safe for use in cosmetic products at the maximum dermal tested concentration of 0.05%.


1985 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 107-146 ◽  

The 7 Stearates described in this report are either oily liquids or waxy solids that are primarily used in cosmetics as skin emollients at concentrations up to 25 percent. The toxicology of the Stearates has been assessed in a number of animal studies. They have low acute oral toxicity and are essentially nonirritating to the rabbit eye when tested at and above use concentration. At cosmetic use concentrations the Stearates are, at most, minimally irritating to rabbit skin. In clinical studies the Stearates and cosmetic products containing them were at most minimally to mildly irritating to the human skin, essentially nonsensitizing, nonphototoxic and nonphotosensitizing. Comedogenicity is a potential health effect that should be considered when the Stearate ingredients are used in cosmetic formulations. On the basis of the information in this report, it is concluded that Butyl, Cetyl, Isobutyl, Isocetyl, Isopropyl, Myristyl, and Octyl Stearate are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the present practices of use.


1994 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 154-156 ◽  

Adipic Acid Dihydrazide has been used as a chemical additive in a variety of cosmetic products. The ingredient was previously reported to be used; however, there are no reported uses of Adipic Acid Dihydrazide during 1992. The available safety test data were insufficient to judge the safety of use of Adipic Acid Dihydrazide in cosmetic products. The types of data required before an evaluation on the safety of use of this cosmetic ingredient include: metabolism (stability of compound in vivo, with respect to hydrolysis to hydrazine); stability and impurities (specifically, data on hydrazine content is necessary); concentration of use in cosmetic formulations. If the interpretation of the preceding requested data indicates that this ingredient could be safely used in cosmetic formulations, the following additional safety test data must be available and evaluated before it can be determined whether this compound may be safely used in cosmetic products. The needed data include: chemistry (including pH, method of manufacture, and UV spectrum); ocular irritation; dermal irritation; dermal sensitization; dermal photosensitization (only if the compound absorbs in the UV spectrum); 28-day dermal toxicity; genotoxicity (at least two assays); carcinogenicity may be requested if genotoxicity assays are positive.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document