scholarly journals THE LEXICAL PLAN SUPPLETIVISM IN TURKIC LANGUAGES

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
pp. 184-185
Author(s):  
Karimova Vasila Vakhobovna

The article deals with one of the most important problems of the modern language science, which was not the special consideration object. This problem is the suppletivism and lexical suppletives’ presence and functioning in the language.

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 105-114
Author(s):  
Zinnur Sirazitdinov ◽  
◽  
Lilia Buskunbaeva ◽  
Tashpolot Sadykov ◽  
◽  
...  

The article deals with the principles of transcription of audio materials of field expeditions to create a phonetic corpus of Turkic languages, including dialects and subdialects. Transcription is developed on the basis of audio corpus data on the subdialects of the Eastern dialect of the Bashkir language. It is close to phonemic and as close as possible to the spelling of the modern language. Free access of linguists of different specialization to the primary corpus is provided, which will serve as an invaluable source for the study of territorial dialects, the establishment of areas of distribution of a language phenomenon, will be the basis for the study of the historical development and formation of the literary language, sociolinguistic analysis, comparative studies of languages. The proposed guidelines for the transcription of the audio field expeditions, multi-level layout, including paralinguistics elements hesitation phenomena will be useful when creating similar corpora phonetic speech for all related Turkic languages.


2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (01) ◽  
pp. 43-45
Author(s):  
Teyyub Arikh Guliyev ◽  
◽  
Jala Elman Ganiyeva ◽  

Just as somatic expressions, phraseological compounds are rich in the lexical structure of the Azerbaijani language, their history is also ancient. This is due to both the ethnic outlook of the people and the language's ability to fully incorporate creative thinking. A lot of research has been done on the formation of phraseological compounds in Azerbaijani linguistics, some notes have been made about the sources of phraseological compounds. During our research, we came across the opinions of linguists based on their observations on monuments such as Orkhon-Yenisey, Kitabi-Dada Gorgud, Divani-dictionary-it-Turk. According to their research, in ancient times the number of phraseological combinations becomes less than in our modern language. Some of the phraseological combinations, especially those formed on the basis of key words belonging to the Turkic languages (ie, the noun in the formation of the phraseological unit) have a more ancient history. Based on written monuments, we can say that the vast majority of the phraseological fund belonging to the historical antiquities consists of phraseological combinations, somatic expressions formed by the names of body parts. The language of folklore materials, like monuments such as Orkhon-Yenisey, Kitabi-Dada Gorgud, Divani-lughat-it-turk, is a very rich source for the study of phraseological combinations, including somatic expressions. This includes phraseological materials in the language of bayats, riddles, proverbs and parables, tales and epics that preserve ancient traces.


PMLA ◽  
1935 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 1343-1343

The fifty-second meeting of the Modern Language Associationof America was held, on the invitation of the University of Cincinnati, at Cincinnati, Ohio, Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, December 30 and 31, 1935, and January 1, 1936. The Association headquarters were in the Netherland Plaza Hotel, where all meetings were held except those of Tuesday morning and afternoon. These took place at the University of Cincinnati. Registration cards at headquarters were signed by about 900, though a considerably larger number of members were in attendance. The Local Committee estimated the attendance at not less than 1400. This Committee consisted of Professor Frank W. Chandler, Chairman; Professor Edwin H. Zeydel; Professor Phillip Ogden; Mr. John J. Rowe (for the Directors); and Mr. Joseph S. Graydon (for the Alumni).


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-210
Author(s):  
Artemis Alexiadou

This paper discusses the formation of synthetic compounds with proper names. While these are possible in English, Greek disallows such formations. However, earlier stages of the language allowed such compounds, and in the modern language formations of this type are possible as long as they contain heads that are either bound roots or root- derived nominals of Classical Greek origin. The paper builds on the following ingredients: a) proper names are phrases; b) synthetic compounding in Modern Greek involves incorporation, and thus proper names cannot incorporate; c) by contrast, English synthetic compounds involve phrasal movement, and thus proper names can appear within compounds in this language. It is shown that in earlier Greek, proper names had the same status as their English counterparts, hence the possibility of synthetic compounds with proper names. It is further argued that the formations that involve bound/archaic roots are actually cases of either root compounding or root affixation and not synthetic compounds.


2018 ◽  
pp. 123-134
Author(s):  
E. V. Mikhailovskaya ◽  
◽  
D. A. Gabriel ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document