scholarly journals The impact of retro-cue validity on working memory representation: Evidence from electroencephalograms

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueying Fu ◽  
Chaoxiong Ye ◽  
huzhonghua ◽  
Tengfei Liang ◽  
Ziyuan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Memory Storage ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Memory Representation ◽  
Attention And Memory ◽  
Alpha Power ◽  
Cue Validity ◽  
Validity Condition ◽  
The Impact

Memory performance can be improved by retrospectively cueing an item maintained in visual working memory (VWM). Different hypotheses have been proposed to explain the mechanisms behind retro-cueing and VWM. Previous behavioral studies suggest that different retro-cue validities may lead individuals to implement retro-cues in different ways to obtain a retro-cue effect. However, there is still no clear electroencephalogram (EEG) evidence to support that the retro-cue effect under different validity conditions is triggered by different mechanisms. Herein, we investigated whether retro-cue validity modulated the mechanisms underlying the retro-cue effect in VWM by using EEGs. We manipulated retro-cue validity by using blocks in a color change detection task. Contralateral delay activity (CDA) and lateralized alpha power were used assess spatial attention and memory storage, respectively. Significant retro-cue effects were observed under both high- and low-validity conditions. More importantly, although the retro-cue could redirect spatial attention under both high- and low-validity conditions, we found that participants maintained the non-cued items during a measured time interval under the low-validity condition, but dropped them out of VWM under the high-validity condition. Our results resolve previous contradictory findings. The retro-cue effect in our study can be explained by the removal hypothesis, prioritization hypothesis, and protection-during-retrieval hypothesis. This work suggests that the mechanisms underlying the retro-cue effect are not mutually exclusive, but determined by the cue validity. Individuals can voluntarily choose different mechanisms based on the expected retro-cue validity.

scholarly journals Rhythmic Accessibility to Sequential Working Memory in a Theta Phase-Dependent Manner

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Ideriha ◽  
Junichi Ushiyama
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Memory Storage ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Random Interval ◽  
Phase Coding ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Theta Phase ◽  
Sequential Information ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Theta Range

Working memory is active short-term memory storage that is easily accessible and underlies various activities, such as maintaining phone numbers in mind for a short period [1,2]. There is accumulating theoretical and physiological evidence that memorized items are represented rhythmically by neural oscillation in the theta range (4-7 Hz) [3,4]. However, the impact of this process on human behavior is yet to be examined. Here we show that simply memorizing sequential information affects a behavioral index (i.e., reaction time, RT) in a rhythmic manner. In the main experiment (Experiment 1), we measured RTs to a visual probe that appeared at one of two sequentially memorized locations after a random interval. Consequently, RTs to the first and second probes each fluctuated in the theta range as a function of the random interval, and the phases of the two theta fluctuations were not in phase or anti-phase, but shifted by approximately 270 degree. Interestingly, the 270 degree phase difference corresponded to the rhythm of "phase coding", where sequential information is represented on the specific phase of theta oscillation [5-7]. These relationships were not observed in tasks simply requiring attention (Experiment 2) or memorization (Experiment 3) of spatial locations without sequential order. In conclusion, the current results demonstrate that our behavior fluctuates when recalling memorized sequential items in the theta-range, suggesting that accessibility to sequential working memory is rhythmic rather than stable, possibly reflecting theta-phase coding.

scholarly journals Contralateral Delay Activity Tracks Fluctuations in Working Memory Performance

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1229-1240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten C. S. Adam ◽  
Matthew K. Robison ◽  
Edward K. Vogel
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Memory Load ◽  
Memory Performance ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Memory Storage ◽  
Alpha Power ◽  
Working Memory Load ◽  
Contralateral Delay Activity ◽  
Trial Performance

Neural measures of working memory storage, such as the contralateral delay activity (CDA), are powerful tools in working memory research. CDA amplitude is sensitive to working memory load, reaches an asymptote at known behavioral limits, and predicts individual differences in capacity. An open question, however, is whether neural measures of load also track trial-by-trial fluctuations in performance. Here, we used a whole-report working memory task to test the relationship between CDA amplitude and working memory performance. If working memory failures are due to decision-based errors and retrieval failures, CDA amplitude would not differentiate good and poor performance trials when load is held constant. If failures arise during storage, then CDA amplitude should track both working memory load and trial-by-trial performance. As expected, CDA amplitude tracked load (Experiment 1), reaching an asymptote at three items. In Experiment 2, we tracked fluctuations in trial-by-trial performance. CDA amplitude was larger (more negative) for high-performance trials compared with low-performance trials, suggesting that fluctuations in performance were related to the successful storage of items. During working memory failures, participants oriented their attention to the correct side of the screen (lateralized P1) and maintained covert attention to the correct side during the delay period (lateralized alpha power suppression). Despite the preservation of attentional orienting, we found impairments consistent with an executive attention theory of individual differences in working memory capacity; fluctuations in executive control (indexed by pretrial frontal theta power) may be to blame for storage failures.

scholarly journals Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 558-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Hakim ◽  
Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld ◽  
Edward Awh ◽  
Edward K. Vogel
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Alpha Power ◽  
Neural Signals ◽  
Neural Representations ◽  
Contralateral Delay Activity ◽  
The Face ◽  
Task Irrelevant ◽  
The Impact

Working memory maintains information so that it can be used in complex cognitive tasks. A key challenge for this system is to maintain relevant information in the face of task-irrelevant perturbations. Across two experiments, we investigated the impact of task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory. We recorded EEG activity in humans while they performed a working memory task. On a subset of trials, we interrupted participants with salient but task-irrelevant objects. To track the impact of these task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory, we measured two well-characterized, temporally sensitive EEG markers that reflect active, prioritized working memory representations: the contralateral delay activity and lateralized alpha power (8–12 Hz). After interruption, we found that contralateral delay activity amplitude momentarily sustained but was gone by the end of the trial. Lateralized alpha power was immediately influenced by the interrupters but recovered by the end of the trial. This suggests that dissociable neural processes contribute to the maintenance of working memory information and that brief irrelevant onsets disrupt two distinct online aspects of working memory. In addition, we found that task expectancy modulated the timing and magnitude of how these two neural signals responded to task-irrelevant interruptions, suggesting that the brain's response to task-irrelevant interruption is shaped by task context.

Impact of Experimental Modulation of EEG Alpha Power on Visual Working Memory Storage in Healthy Participants

2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. S403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly Erickson ◽  
Dillon Smith ◽  
Laura Crespo ◽  
Steven Silverstein
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Visual Working Memory ◽  
Memory Storage ◽  
Alpha Power ◽  
Eeg Alpha ◽  
Healthy Participants

When creativity met transfer

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-27
Author(s):  
Shlomo Kaniel
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Transfer Of Learning ◽  
Efficient Solution ◽  
Memory Storage ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Reciprocal Relationships ◽  
System 2 ◽  
System 1 ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Alternative Solutions

The primary purpose of this article is to combine both transfer of learning (hereafter, transfer) and creativity into similar processes that can increase the products of transfer and creativity. Both transfer and creativity operate within reciprocal relationships between memory storage and working memory. Moreover, they are also based on moving from System 1 processing (rapid, associative, automatic) to System 2 processing (slow and controlled) by several sequential series of circular stages: (1) acquisition and storage of the learning to be transferred and created; (2) identifying a problem/goal after a time interval; (3) active and controlled search in the memory storage for a solution, weighing alternative solutions, deciding what is the correct and most efficient solution and executing that chosen alternative; and (4) evaluating the process while deriving feedback and drawing conclusions for the next round of the above stages.

scholarly journals Controlling the flow of interruption in working memory

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Hakim ◽  
Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld ◽  
Edward Awh ◽  
Edward K Vogel
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Attentional Capture ◽  
Attentional Control ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Alpha Power ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
New Information ◽  
Contralateral Delay Activity ◽  
Component Processes

AbstractVisual working memory (WM) must maintain relevant information, despite the constant influx of both relevant and irrelevant information. Attentional control mechanisms help determine which of this new information gets access to our capacity-limited WM system. Previous work has treated attentional control as a monolithic process–either distractors capture attention or they are suppressed. Here, we provide evidence that attentional capture may instead be broken down into at least two distinct sub-component processes: 1) spatial capture, which refers to when spatial attention shifts towards the location of irrelevant stimuli, and 2) item-based capture, which refers to when item-based WM representations of irrelevant stimuli are formed. To dissociate these two sub-component processes of attentional capture, we utilized a series of EEG components that track WM maintenance (contralateral delay activity), suppression (distractor positivity), item individuation (N2pc), and spatial attention (lateralized alpha power). We show that relevant interrupters trigger both spatial and item-based capture, which means that they undermine WM maintenance more. Irrelevant interrupters, however, only trigger spatial capture from which ongoing WM representations can recover more easily. This fractionation of attentional capture into distinct sub-component processes provides a framework by which the fate of ongoing WM processes after interruption can be explained.

scholarly journals Distractor inhibition contributes to retroactive attentional orienting within working memory: Evidence by lateralized alpha oscillations in the EEG

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Schneider ◽  
Anna Barth ◽  
Henrike Haase ◽  
Clayton Hickey ◽  
Edmund Wascher
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Memory Representation ◽  
Alpha Power ◽  
Attentional Orienting ◽  
Cognitive Mechanisms ◽  
Storage And Retrieval ◽  
Irrelevant Item ◽  
Memory Representations ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Memory Resources

AbstractShifts of attention within mental representations based on retroactive cues (retro-cues) facilitate performance in working memory tasks. It was suggested that this retro-cue benefit is related to the concentration of working memory resources on a subset of representations, thereby improving storage and retrieval at the cost of non-cued items. However, the attentional mechanisms underlying this updating of working memory representations remain unknown. Here, we present EEG data for distinguishing between target enhancement and distractor suppression processes in the context of retroactive attentional orienting. Therefore, we used a working memory paradigm with retro-cues indicating a shift of attention to either a lateralized or non-lateralized item. There was an increase of posterior alpha power contralateral compared to ipsilateral to the irrelevant item when a non-lateralized mental representation was cued and a contralateral suppression of posterior alpha power when a lateralized item had to be selected. This suggests that both inhibition of the non-cued information and enhancement of the target representation are important features of attentional orienting within working memory. By further presenting cues to either remember or to forget a working memory representation, we give a first impression of these retroactive attentional sub-processes as two separable cognitive mechanisms.

scholarly journals Perturbing neural representations of working memory with task-irrelevant interruption

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Hakim ◽  
Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld ◽  
Edward Awh ◽  
Edward K. Vogel
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Cognitive Tasks ◽  
Alpha Power ◽  
Task Context ◽  
Neural Representations ◽  
Task Irrelevant ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Neural Signatures

AbstractWorking memory maintains information so that it can be used in complex cognitive tasks. A key challenge for this system is to maintain relevant information in the face of task-irrelevant perturbations. In this series of experiments, we investigated the impact of task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory. We recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) activity in humans while they performed a working memory task. On a subset of trials, we interrupted participants with salient, but task-irrelevant objects. To track the impact of these task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory, we measured two well-characterized, temporally sensitive EEG markers that reflect active, prioritized working memory representations: the contralateral delay activity (CDA) and lateralized alpha power (8-12hz). Following interruption, we found that CDA momentarily sustained, but was gone by the end of the trial. Lateralized alpha power was immediately influenced by the interrupters, but recovered by the end of the trial. This suggests that dissociable neural processes contribute to the maintenance of working memory information. Additionally, we found that task expectancy modulated the timing and magnitude of how these two neural signals responded to task-irrelevant interruptions, suggesting that the brain’s response to task-irrelevant interruption is shaped by task context. The distinct time courses of and influence of task context on these two neural signatures of working memory have many interesting theoretical implications about how information is actively maintained in working memory.Significance statementWorking memory plays a central role in intelligent behaviors because it actively maintains relevant information that is easily accessible and manipulatable. In everyday life, we are often interrupted while performing such complex cognitive tasks. Therefore, understanding how working memory responds to and overcomes momentary task-irrelevant interruptions is critical for us to understand how complex cognition works. Here, we unveil how two distinct neural signatures of working memory respond to task-irrelevant interruptions by recording electroencephalogram activity in humans. Our findings raise long-standing theoretical questions about how different neural and cognitive processes contribute to the maintenance of information in working memory.

scholarly journals Hemispheric asymmetries in posterior alpha power reflect the selection and inhibition of spatial context information in working memory

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene Roesner ◽  
Stefan Arnau ◽  
Isabel Skiba ◽  
Edmund Wascher ◽  
Daniel Schneider
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Spatial Context ◽  
Alpha Power ◽  
Hemispheric Asymmetries ◽  
Distractor Processing ◽  
Oscillatory Power ◽  
Memory Content ◽  
The Impact

There is an ongoing debate on the contribution of target enhancement and distractor inhibition processes to selective attention. In a working memory task, we presented to-be-memorized information in a way that posterior hemispheric asymmetries in oscillatory power could be unambiguously linked to lateral target vs. distractor processing. Alpha power asymmetries (8-14 Hz) were insensitive to the number of cued or non-cued items, supporting their relation to spatial attention. Furthermore, we found an increase in alpha power contralateral to non-cued working memory content and an alpha power suppression contralateral to relevant information. These oscillatory patterns relative to the positions of cued and non-cued items were related to the participants' ability to control for the impact of irrelevant information on working memory retrieval. Based on these results, we propose that spatially specific modulations of posterior alpha power are related to accessing vs. inhibiting the spatial context of information stored in working memory.

scholarly journals Pinging the brain with visual impulses reveals electrically active, not activity-silent, working memories

PLoS Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. e3001436
Author(s):  
Joao Barbosa ◽  
Diego Lozano-Soldevilla ◽  
Albert Compte
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Computational Models ◽  
Neuronal Firing ◽  
Memory Storage ◽  
Alpha Power ◽  
Eeg Data ◽  
Synaptic Changes ◽  
Biological Cost ◽  
The Relationship

Persistently active neurons during mnemonic periods have been regarded as the mechanism underlying working memory maintenance. Alternatively, neuronal networks could instead store memories in fast synaptic changes, thus avoiding the biological cost of maintaining an active code through persistent neuronal firing. Such “activity-silent” codes have been proposed for specific conditions in which memories are maintained in a nonprioritized state, as for unattended but still relevant short-term memories. A hallmark of this “activity-silent” code is that these memories can be reactivated from silent, synaptic traces. Evidence for “activity-silent” working memory storage has come from human electroencephalography (EEG), in particular from the emergence of decodability (EEG reactivations) induced by visual impulses (termed pinging) during otherwise “silent” periods. Here, we reanalyze EEG data from such pinging studies. We find that the originally reported absence of memory decoding reflects weak statistical power, as decoding is possible based on more powered analyses or reanalysis using alpha power instead of raw voltage. This reveals that visual pinging EEG “reactivations” occur in the presence of an electrically active, not silent, code for unattended memories in these data. This crucial change in the evidence provided by this dataset prompts a reinterpretation of the mechanisms of EEG reactivations. We provide 2 possible explanations backed by computational models, and we discuss the relationship with TMS-induced EEG reactivations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document