scholarly journals Reward rapidly enhances visual perception

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip Cheng ◽  
Anina N. Rich ◽  
Mike Le Pelley

Rewards exert a deep influence on our cognition and behaviour. Here, we used a paradigm in which reward information was provided at either encoding or retrieval of a brief, masked stimulus to show that reward can also rapidly modulate early neural processing of visual information, prior to consciousness. Experiment 1 showed enhanced response accuracy when a to-be-encoded grating signalled high reward relative to low reward, but only when the grating was presented very briefly and participants were not consciously aware of it. Experiment 2 showed no difference in response accuracy when reward information was instead provided at the stage of retrieval, ruling out an explanation of the reward-modulation effect in terms of differences in motivated retrieval. Taken together, our findings provide the first behavioural evidence for a rapid reward-modulation of visual perception, which does not seem to require consciousness.

2021 ◽  
pp. 095679762110218
Author(s):  
Phillip (Xin) Cheng ◽  
Anina N. Rich ◽  
Mike E. Le Pelley

Rewards exert a deep influence on our cognition and behavior. Here, we used a paradigm in which reward information was provided at either encoding or retrieval of a brief, masked stimulus to show that reward can also rapidly modulate perceptual encoding of visual information. Experiment 1 ( n = 30 adults) showed that participants’ response accuracy was enhanced when a to-be-encoded grating signaled high reward relative to low reward, but only when the grating was presented very briefly and participants reported that they were not consciously aware of it. Experiment 2 ( n = 29 adults) showed that there was no difference in participants’ response accuracy when reward information was instead provided at the stage of retrieval, ruling out an explanation of the reward-modulation effect in terms of differences in motivated retrieval. Taken together, our findings provide behavioral evidence consistent with a rapid reward modulation of visual perception, which may not require consciousness.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Sterzer ◽  
Timo Stein ◽  
Karin Ludwig ◽  
Marcus Rothkirch ◽  
Guido Hesselmann

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederik Stjernfelt

Abstract The paper is a critical investigation of the linguist James Hurford's bold proposal that animal cognition conforms to basic logical structure – particularly striking in the ventral-dorsal split of visual perception. The overall argument is that dorsal processing of visual information isolates the subject of a simple, perceptual proposition, while ventral processing addresses the corresponding predicate aspect – the two indicating and categorizing the object of perception, respectively. The paper investigates some of the problems in Hurford's interpretation – particularly his refusal of animal proto-language to have anything corresponding to constants or proper names and his idea that all such propositions must be monovalent only (and thus not addressing relations). As an alternative to Hurford's psychological interpretation of Frege for his logical basis, Peirce's theory of propositions – so-called “Dicisigns” – is proposed.


1971 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 457-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. García Austt ◽  
W. Bun˜o ◽  
A. Vanzulli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document