scholarly journals Don’t Take it Personally: Resistance to Individually Targeted Recommendations with Anthropomorphic Recommender Systems

Author(s):  
Guy Laban ◽  
Theo Araujo

Recommender agents, artificially intelligent recommender systems that demonstrate anthropomorphic cues, are widely available online to provide consumers with individually tailored recommendations. Nevertheless, little is known about the effect of their anthropomorphic cues on users’ resistance to both the system and recommendations. Moreover, individually tailored recommendations require users to disclose information proactively or reactively for receiving customized or personalized recommendations, which can trigger users’ resistance to the platform and the recommendations. Accordingly, this study examined the extent to which recommender systems’ anthropomorphic cues and the type of recommendations provided (customized and personalized) influenced online users’ perceptions of control, trustworthiness, and the risk of using the platform. The study assessed how these perceptions, in turn, influence users’ adherence to the recommendations. An online experiment among online users (N = 266) with recommender agents and web recommender platforms that provided customized or personalized restaurant recommendations was conducted. The results of the experiment entail that when recommendations are customized, as compared to personalized, users are less likely to demonstrate resistance and are more likely to adhere to the recommendations provided. Furthermore, the study’s findings suggest that these effects are amplified for recommender agents, demonstrating anthropomorphic cues, in contrast to traditional systems as web recommender platforms.

Author(s):  
Farid Huseynov

Among thousands of alternatives, most of the time online customers cannot easily decide on which product to purchase or service to utilize. In order to assist online customers in their decision-making process, business owners have started to make their online platforms more intelligent by enhancing their platforms with intelligent recommender systems. Recommender systems, also known as recommender agents or intelligent agents, are intelligent software that provide easily accessible, personalized, highly relevant, and high-quality recommendations to customers in various online platforms. This chapter discusses different types of recommender systems and provides use case examples of recommender systems in various e-commerce platforms. This chapter shows how recommender systems make life easier for online customers in the constantly developing and growing internet environment. This chapter also discusses the challenges posed by recommender systems to online customers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 354-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yavor Paunov ◽  
Michaela Wänke ◽  
Tobias Vogel

Abstract. Combining the strengths of defaults and transparency information is a potentially powerful way to induce policy compliance. Despite negative theoretical predictions, a recent line of research revealed that default nudges may become more effective if people are informed why they should exhibit the targeted behavior. Yet, it is an open empirical question whether the increase in compliance came from setting a default and consequently disclosing it, or the provided information was sufficient to deliver the effect on its own. Results from an online experiment indicate that both defaulting and transparency information exert a statistically independent effect on compliance, with highest compliance rates observed in the combined condition. Practical and theoretical implications are discussed.


Author(s):  
Matthias Hofer

Abstract. This was a study on the perceived enjoyment of different movie genres. In an online experiment, 176 students were randomly divided into two groups (n = 88) and asked to estimate how much they, their closest friends, and young people in general enjoyed either serious or light-hearted movies. These self–other differences in perceived enjoyment of serious or light-hearted movies were also assessed as a function of differing individual motivations underlying entertainment media consumption. The results showed a clear third-person effect for light-hearted movies and a first-person effect for serious movies. The third-person effect for light-hearted movies was moderated by level of hedonic motivation, as participants with high hedonic motivations did not perceive their own and others’ enjoyment of light-hearted films differently. However, eudaimonic motivations did not moderate first-person perceptions in the case of serious films.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 262-266
Author(s):  
Sanjay . ◽  
Yogesh Kumar ◽  
Rahul Rishi

Author(s):  
Hui Zhang

Introduction: This study examined effects of two journalistic practices in reporting conflicting scientific evidence, hedging and presentation format, on scientists’ and journalists’ credibility and issue uncertainty. Methods: An online experiment was conducted using students from a western U.S. university. Hedging was manipulated as reporting methodological limitations versus not reporting the limitations in news articles covering the conflict. Presentation format was manipulated as using a single news article to report both sides of the conflict versus using double articles with one side of the conflict in one article and the other side in the other article. Results: The study found that perceived issue uncertainty was higher in hedged news articles than that in non-hedged articles; presentation format did not affect people’s perceived issue uncertainty. For scientists’ credibility (both competence and trustworthiness), this study found that it was lower in the single-article format than that in the double-article format; for journalists’ credibility, this study found that journalists’ trustworthiness in the two formats did not vary, but their competence was lower in the double-article format than that in the single-article format. Conclusion: This study contributes to the field of science and health communication by examining effects of presentation format used in communicating conflicting health-related scientific evidence and by examining effects of communicating scientific limitations in a context where conflicting evidence exists. Keywords: conflicting scientific evidence, hedging, presentation format, scientists’ credibility, journalists’ credibility


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Cai WANG ◽  
Xiang-Wu MENG ◽  
Yu-Jie ZHANG

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cong LI ◽  
Zhi-Gang LUO ◽  
Jin-Long SHI
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document