Threat Effects on Cognitive Systems: Testing Links to Aggression Proneness
The biobehavioral study of aggression has implications for expanding our understanding of transdiagnostic processes that increase risk for disinhibited behaviors. Towards this end, our study tested the process model of aggression (Verona & Bresin, 2015), examining whether threat-related changes in cognitive functioning are associated with self- and informant-reports of aggressive actions. Using event-related potential (ERP) measures of cognitive-attentional processes, 143 community participants were administered well-validated and translational laboratory manipulations of threat (NPU task; Schmitz & Grillon, 2012) and cognitive systems activation (Posner et al., 1980). Results confirmed the differential effects of threat predictability on ERP and behavioral indices of attentional alerting and executive control. More unpredictable threat enhanced alerting-related quicker responding, whereas more predictable threat interfered with processing of and performance on the flanker task. The results, however, failed to support the process model of aggression regarding threat-related cognitive alterations in aggression. The findings fit with a broader literature on cognitive and behavioral outputs of threat activation and provide fruitful avenues for better understanding threat-related aggression.