scholarly journals How to measure a psychological construct in cross-national comparison: Regarding Rhoads et al. (2021)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sotaro Kita

This is a critique of the altruism variables used by Rhoads et al. (2021). Accepted for publication as "Letter to Editor" in Psychological Science. Rhoads, S. A., Gunter, D., Ryan, R. M., & Marsh, A. A. Global Variation in Subjective Well-Being Predicts Seven Forms of Altruism. Psychological Science, 0(0), 0956797621994767. doi:10.1177/0956797621994767

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-72
Author(s):  
Petra Raudenská ◽  
Radka Hanzlová

Survey-based measures of subjective well-being are more and more often analyzed cross-culturally. However, international comparison of these measures requires measurement invariance. Therefore, the major goal of this study was to investigate the cross-country comparability of the five-item subjective well-being scales used in the International Social Survey Programme (2011, 2017). This study applied both the traditional exact and the more recent Bayesian approximate approach to assess whether the subjective well-being scales were measurement invariant. The Bayesian approach detected several non‑invariant items that were problematic for cross-national comparison and could be dropped from the scales. Consequently, measurement invariance was established in all countries for the reduced scales, allowing researchers to meaningfully compare their latent mean scores and the relationships with other theoretical constructs of interest. Thus, the study highlighted the advantages of using multiple indicators and the necessity of measurement invariance testing in subjective well-being research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotta K. Harju ◽  
Joonas Rokka ◽  
Maíra Magalhães Lopes ◽  
Massimo Airoldi ◽  
Karine Raïes

The coronavirus pandemic, social distancing, and lockdown measures have had an impact on employee well-being. This study uses Latent Profile Analysis to examine subjective well-being among employees during the first lockdown based on a cross-national survey in UK and France (n = 652). We identify five distinct well-being profiles, namely Moderately positive (67%), Languishing (18%), Flourishing (8%), Mixed feelings (4%), and Apathetic (3%). The results showed that while some employees were suffering, others managed to thrive and cope with the stresses of the lockdown. We also found that the profiles could be distinguished by perceived changes in financial situation and physical health as well as experienced boredom. Our study complements prior studies that examine the relations between individual characteristics and well-being during the pandemic on a general level by showing that employee well-being under lockdown is not the same across the board.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Akihiro Masuyama ◽  
Daichi Sugawara ◽  
Nuntaporn Karawekpanyawong ◽  
Phanida Juntasopeepun ◽  
Surinporn Likhitsathian ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document