Dermatite de Contato Alérgica aos (Meta)Acrilatos- estudo retrospetivo de sete anos num Hospital Público Português

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Alvaro Oliveira ◽  
Filipa Almeida ◽  
Regina Caldas ◽  
Teresa Pereira ◽  
Celeste Brito

Introduction Acrylates are salts or esters of the acrylic acid, widely used as part of cosmetic or dental products, surgical equipment, medical devices, household items, building materials and printing inks. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by (metha)acrylates could be described in occupational settings, mainly in beauticians using acrylic manicure and, specifically, the photo-bonded long-lasting nail polish. The use of gloves, fingertips made of Polyethylene/ Ethylvinyl-alcohol, mask, safety glasses and an appropriate uniform are recommended in these cases. Materials and methods We present a retrospective study of ACD to acrylates diagnosed at an Hospital in Braga (Portugal), between January 2012 and March 2018. In all cases the epicutaneous patch tests used included the Portuguese Contact Dermatitis Research Group baseline series and an extended series of (meth)acrylates. Results A total of 39 female patients had a sensitization to (metha)acrylates, aged between 21-66 years, with personal history of atopic eczema and allergic rhinitis in 23 and 26% of cases, respectively. The most frequent presentation was hand eczema (87%). Dorsal and palms were affected in an equal percentage of cases (38%) and nail dystrophy in 8% of patients. Ectopic lesions on the face were detected in 33% of cases, mostly with the involvement of the eyelids. Occupational related exposure due to (metha)acrylates was found in 69% of cases, mostly of them beauticians/ artificial nail technicians. The most common sensitizers among the 39 allergic individuals were 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA; positive in 97% of cases) and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (positive in 69% of cases). Conclusion In our population, we highlight the high number of cases of ACD from (meth)acrylates in relation to artificial nails. Concerning to the health and safety of workers, it certainly deserves better preventive measures at the occupational level and specific regulation from the authorities concerned with the safety of consumers. HEMA was the most frequent positive allergen (above 90% of tests) and, in agreement with previous studies, can be considered a good screening allergen.

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 360-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Elena Gatica-Ortega ◽  
Maria-Antonia Pastor-Nieto ◽  
Pedro Mercader-García ◽  
Juan-Francisco Silvestre-Salvador

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosana Lazzarini ◽  
Mariana F. S. Hafner ◽  
Barbara A. F. Miguel ◽  
Nathalia T. Kawakami ◽  
Beatriz H. Y. Nakagome

1990 ◽  
Vol 28 (23) ◽  
pp. 92.4-92

Hydrocortisone (Section 13.4) is available over the counter but is sold to the public only for certain limited indications, namely allergic contact dermatitis, irritant dermatitis and insect bite reactions. Pharmacists may not supply hydrocortisone preparations for chronic conditions, such as eczema, or for use on the face, anogenital region, broken or infected skin (Drug Ther Bull 1987; 14: 53).


1973 ◽  
Vol 2 (14) ◽  
pp. 681-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
John N. Burry ◽  
John Kirk ◽  
John G. Reid ◽  
Tom Turner

2020 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 329-330
Author(s):  
Sarra Saad ◽  
Ines Lahouel ◽  
Hichem Belhadjali ◽  
Asma Kheder ◽  
Monia Youssef ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phuong Pham Thi Minh ◽  
Trang Thi Minh ◽  
Doanh Le Huu ◽  
Thuong Nguyen Van ◽  
Sau Nguyen Huu ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is a common chronic and relapsing skin disease with various clinical features. Hand eczema aetiology can be allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), atopic dermatitis (AD) and unknown or combination causes. If the causative agents are not detected treatment of hand eczema will be a failure. A patch test can be useful to detect causative agents in suspected allergic contact hand eczema. Then patients will avoid contacting them. This results in the improvement of hand eczema. In Vietnam, patch test has not been used before, so we conduct this study. AIM: To identify causative allergens by using patch test with 28 standard allergens in consecutive patients. METHODS: A group of 300 HE patients from the National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology (NHDV) in Vietnam were enrolled in this study. They were divided into 4 groups-ACD, ICD, AD and unknown aetiology. The patient was patch tested with 28 standard allergens to identify the causative agents. RESULTS: Among the 300 HE enrolled patients, ACD accounted for 72.7%, AD and ICD had the same rate of 12.7%. 39.3% of the patients had a positive patch test. Reaction to nickel sulfate was the most common (10.3%), followed by potassium dichromate (9.7%), cobalt (4%) and fragrance mix (3.1%). About one-third of the cases had relevant clinical reactions correlated with the contact agents and clinical history. Males reacted to cement, thiuram mix and formaldehyde more than females, while females reacted to a nickel more than males. CONCLUSIONS: Hand eczema has variable clinical features and diverse aetiology. ACD is an important cause of hand eczema that can be managed with a patch test to detect causative allergens. Nearly 40% of HE cases had positive patch test. Relevant patch test reactions were seen in one-third of the patients. We propose using patch test detect causative agents in suspected allergic contact hand eczema. Then patients will avoid contacting them. This results in the improvement of hand eczema.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document