scholarly journals Epidural tramadol improves the quality of pain relief during labor

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
I N Shrestha ◽  
G P Deo ◽  
S K Shrestha ◽  
S Neupane ◽  
B S Regmi
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

 To study the analgesic efficacy and side effects of Tramadol for painless labor in combination with Bupivacaine. Randomized, controlled, double blind, open prospective study conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chitwan Medical College from July 1st 2015 to June 30th 2016. 100 patients of ASA Grade I and II, aged between 20-35 years willing for epidural analgesia for labor pain were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group A- Control group and Group B- Study group. Subjects of Group A received 10 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine and that of Group B received 10ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine with 1mg/kg body weight of tramadol. Analgesic efficacy was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and other vital parameters (Blood Pressure, Heart Rate and Respiratory Rate) before the administration of the drug and at different time intervals of 0, 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min and every hourly up to maximum of 5 hrs. Neonatal out comes were assessed by the use of APGAR scores and the side effects of the drugs in two groups were also evaluated. Total number of patients was 100, of ASA Grade I and II, aged between 20-35 years. The mean age of patients in Group A was 23.54 ± 3.74 years and 24.22 ± 3.64 years in Group B. Mode of delivery was spontaneous vaginal in 42 patients (84%) in group A and 45 patients (90%) in group B. Instrumental vaginal delivery was done in 1 patient (2%) of group A and none of group B. Cesarean section was done in 7 patients (14%) of group A and 5 patients (10%) of group B. There was no significant difference in heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate at various time intervals. Pain score of Group B was significantly less at 60th min and had lower values than Group A at various time intervals. Time for first top up was significantly delayed and the total dose of bupivacaine was significantly lower in Group B patients but the incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly high among Group B patients. At one minute majority of the babies of group A had mean APGAR score 6.98 ± 0.55 versus 7.18 ± 0.60 in group B. At 5 minute, Group A had mean score of 8.02 ± 0.47 versus 8.22 ± 0.58 in Group B. There were no significant differences in 2 groups. In both the groups there was no significant effect on duration of second stage of labor and it wasn’t prolonged in any of the patients. Epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine and tramadol provided better pain relief and reduced the total dose of bupivacaine in majority of the patients with no adverse effects on mother and fetus. As tramadol is cheap, safe and effective, it can be considered as a better option to improve quality of pain relief during labor.

scholarly journals Comparison of two different doses dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in sub-arachnoid block for abdominal hysterectomies. A randomized double blinded study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-63
Author(s):  
R Krishna Prabhu ◽  
A Radhakrishnan
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Different Doses

Background: Abdominal hysterectomy is often a long duration procedure and warrants intense pain relief in the post-operative period. Dexmedetomidine when added to bupivacaine in subarachnoid block prolongs the duration of surgical anaesthesia, decreases blood loss and prolongs duration of post-operative pain relief. Aims and Objective: To compare two different doses dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in sub-arachnoid block in abdominal hysterectomy surgeries. Materials and Methods: 60 patients of age group 30-60 years posted for elective abdominal hysterectomies under American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification I or II were randomly allocated into 2 groups of 30 each. Group A received 5 micrograms (μg) of dexmedetomidine along with 3.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine in sub-arachnoid block. Group B received 10 μg of dexmedetomidine along with 3.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine in sub-arachnoid block. Changes in blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, ephedrine consumption, blood loss, duration of sensory block, duration of motor block, duration of analgesia were compared between two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in change in heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, duration of sensory block, duration of motor block between two groups. Patients in group B had significant decrease in blood pressure, blood loss and significant increase in ephedrine consumption compared to Group A. The duration of analgesia was also prolonged in group B compared to Group A. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine in dose of 10 μg is a better adjuvant to bupivacaine for abdominal hysterectomy surgeries.Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.8(2) 2017 59-63

Comparative Study between IV Paracetamol and IM Pethidine for Post Operative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-53
Author(s):  
Raju Ahmed ◽  
Md Shafiul Alam Shaheen ◽  
Md Jashim Uddin ◽  
Md Mahmud Abbasi ◽  
Mohammad Noor A Alam
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Moderate Pain ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Intravenous Paracetamol ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Effective Analgesia

Background: Effective analgesia is important after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Paracetamol have been used extensively as alternatives, and it seems that they are more effective for mild to moderate pain control postoperatively. As laparoscopic Cholecystectomy poses moderate pain, in this study we compare the quality of analgesia and side effects of paracetamol versus pethidine for post-operative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Objectives: This study was designed to observe the effect of I.V. paracetamol and I.M. pethidine for analgesic efficacy in post-operative analgesia with their side effects in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Material and method: Sixty (60) patients were selected in the pre anaesthetic check up room whose were going to be operated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Each patient in group A received intravenous paracetamol (1g/100ml)15mg/kg over 15minutes and group B received intramuscular pethidine (100mg)- 2mg/kg postoperatively. Results: In group A that was paracetamol group and group B that was pethidine group the visual analogue scale (VAS) almost similar but total analgesic consumption in pethidine group were slightly higher than paracetamol group and the respiratory rate were significantly lower in pethidine group. Conclusion: Our results indicate that IV paracetamol 15mg / kg has better analgesic potency and less side effects than 2 mg / kg IM pethidine for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anwer Khan Modern Medical College Journal Vol. 11, No. 1: Jan 2020, P 46-53

scholarly journals A comparative study of dexmedetomidine versus clonidine in epidural anaesthesia to assess the level of sedation in patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1666
Author(s):  
Vinay Pathak ◽  
B. B. Kushwaha ◽  
Girish Chandra ◽  
V. K. Bhatia ◽  
Akash Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Hemodynamic Parameters ◽  
Normal Saline Group ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: To compare study of dexmedetomidine versus clonidine in epidural anesthesia to assess the level of sedation in patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgery.Methods: This was a comparative study conducted on admitted ASA grade I and II patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. The patients were divided into three groups of 30 patients each, according to the epidural medication they received:-Group A-received 15ml of bupivacaine (0.5%) and dexmedetomidine (1.0µg/kg body weight) in 1ml of normal saline; Group B-received 15ml of bupivacaine (0.5%) and clonidine (2.0µg/kg body weight) in 1ml of normal saline; Group C-received 15ml of bupivacaine (0.5%) with 1ml of normal saline. The heart rate, blood pressure, sensory dermatome level, Motor blocked level, pain and VAS were recorded at different time intervals. The side effects were also noted.Results: The baseline parameters were comparable among the groups. All the hemodynamic parameters and other study parameters were similar at Min. 0. All the hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure and SpO2 were variable at different time intervals. Motor block level   was significantly (p<0.05) lower in Group C than Group A and Group B from Min 50 to Min 90. The sedation score was observed to be nil in Group C. The post-op pain score became higher in Group C than Group A and Group B at subsequent time intervals. A 3 (10%) of the rescue agents was observed in Group C. Atropine (30%) and mephenteramine (10%) were common rescue agents in Group B. The bradycardia was observed in 30% patients of Group B and in 40% of Group A.Conclusions: On addition of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine in epidural anesthesia provides better anesthesia and sedation than clonidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine or bupivacaine alone with mild hemodynamic changes which are easily manageable.

scholarly journals Caudal bupivacaine - midazolam for post operative analgesia in children

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13
Author(s):  
Idris Ali ◽  
Amirul Islam ◽  
Golam Morshed ◽  
Nurul Islam ◽  
Ashia Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Anaesthetic Agent ◽  
Caudal Block ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Post Operative Period ◽  
Caudal Analgesia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group B

Background: Adjuvant used with local anaesthetic agent in caudal is more effective for post operative analgesia in children . Aim and objective: To find out the duration and quality of caudal analgesia in children undergoing genitourinary surgery by combination of bupivacaine and midazolam. Methods: A total number of sixty patients ASA grade I&II were selected randomly as per inclusion & exclusion criteria in two groups. Thirty in each group. In group A, caudal block was given by bupivacainemidazolam mixture and in group B, caudal block was given by bupivacaine in lateral decubitus position, just after completion of surgery before reversed from GA. In post operative period arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and duration of analgesia were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups of blood pressure, heart rate, and pain score up to 30 min but after one hour of post operative period pain scores were significant(p<0.05). Conclusion: Midazolam improves the duration and quality of analgesic effect of bupivacaine. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v23i1.18152 Journal of BSA, 2010; 23(1): 8-13

scholarly journals BIOBRAN MGN-3

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
Ahmad Ijaz Masood ◽  
RABEETA SHEIKH ◽  
RANA ATIQUE ANWER
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Hair Loss ◽  
White Blood Cells ◽  
Food Supplement ◽  
Severe Nausea ◽  
Treatment Side Effects ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: The aim of study was to assess the effect of Biobran in reducing of chemotherapy induced side effects in termsof tiredness, anorexia, vomiting and hair loss and quality of life in terms of weight loss. Setting: Radiotherapy Department, NishtarHospital Multan. Material and Methods: Fifty patients of breast cancer were enrolled randomly in two groups. Group-A patients weregiven 3 gram dose of Biobran MGN-3 per day one week before and one week after chemotherapy. Group-B patient were givenchemotherapy alone. Total six cycles of chemotherapy were given. No multivitamin or food supplements were given during this study.Chemotherapy induced side effects (tiredness, anorexia, and vomiting, hair loss) were assessed by questionnaire to the patients beforestart of each cycle. Weight was checked before each cycle to assess weight gain or loss. White blood cells were checked by completeblood count just before and one week after chemotherapy. Results: Between six months, 50 patients were enrolled in RadiotherapyDepartment, Nishtar Hospital Multan. There was a significant reduction in tiredness and anorexia in group-A patients. 20 (80%) patients ofgroup-A felt increase in their diet and no tiredness without any appetizer or multivitamin. But group-B patients demanded for appetizer dueto severe anorexia after chemotherapy except 3 (12%) patients who didn’t use any appetizer or food supplement. In group-A, 15 (60%)patients didn’t need any anti-emetic as compared to group-B all patient (100%) experienced severe nausea during and afterchemotherapy. Group-A patients experienced less hair fall 7 (28%) patients as compared to other group which is 25 (100%) patients.Conclusions: The study showed that, by helping to optimize the immune system, Biobran MGN-3 can not only help maximize treatmentsuccess, but also minimize treatment side effects and improve quality of life during treatment and in recovery.

scholarly journals COMPARISON STUDY OF IVABRADINE WITH METOPROLOL IN MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rishman Tandi ◽  
Tanvi Kumar ◽  
Amritpal Singh Kahlon ◽  
Aaftab Sethi
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Acute coronary syndrome remains as one of the most important causes for morbidity and mortality in developed countries. Therefore, evidence-based management strategy is required to offset the loss of health during an acute coronary syndrome. An effective approach includes both medical and surgical methods. This study was conducted to evaluate the medical method of management. Objective: To study blood pressure and heart rate variability after administration of Ivabradine or metoprolol in cases with acute coronary syndrome. Materials and methods: The study was a Prospective single center observational study conducted in patients attending Cardiology Intensive Care Unit in Nayyar Heart and Superspecialty Hospital, a tertiary care centre located in an urban area. All patients with Acute coronary syndrome admitted to the emergency or cardiac care unit were analysed with ECG as a preliminary diagnostic test and confirmed with troponin markers. They were either given Ivabradine or Metoprolol. Baseline evaluation and follow up was done and necessary data was collected and analysed.   Results: 100 patients were included in the study out of which 50 were given Metoprolol (Group A) and 50 were given Ivabradine (Group B). Themean age of studied cases was found to be 66.54 years in group A and 68.69 years in group B. It was observed that there was a fall in heart rate by 26.8 beats per minute with beta blocker and 24.4 beats per minute with Ivabradine. In case of blood pressure measurement, in patients with beta blocker administration, there was a fall of 25 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure and 17 mm Hg in diastolic blood pressure However, with Ivabradine there was only a fall of 8mm Hg in systolic Blood pressure and 6 mm Hg in diastolic blood pressure. Conclusion: Although Metoprolol is the drug of choice to decrease heart rate and blood pressure in acute coronary syndrome, Ivabradine is being increasingly used in cases where beta blockers are contraindicated as it has similar efficacy in lowering heart rate without compromising contractility of cardiac muscle, thereby maintaining LVEF and blood pressure. Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome, Beta Blockers, Metoprolol, Ivabradine.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Oral Gabapentin and Oral Pregabalin as Preemptive Analgesia for Orthopedic Surgery Under Spinal Anaesthesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-78
Author(s):  
Neena Jain ◽  
Rahul Bankapur ◽  
Preeti Lamba ◽  
saurav Singh
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Orthopedic Surgery ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background and Aims: Gabapentin and pregabalin, by decreasing noxious stimulus induced excitatory neurotransmitter release at central nervous system, may attenuate central sensitization and eventually decrease development of postoperative pain. We evaluated preemptive analgesic efficacy of single dose of oral gabapentin 600 mg and pregabalin 75mg for postoperative pain in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia. Material and methods: A prospective, randomized, double blind study was conducted on 70 patients aged between 18 to 60 years with ASA grade 1 and 2 posted for lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were allocated into Group A and Group B receiving oral gabapentin(600mg) and oral pregabalin (75mg) respectively 1.5 hours before surgery. Primary objective was assessing duration and quality of analgesia by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at 2,4,6,8,10,12,16,20 and 24 hours.Secondary objective was to assess total dose of rescue analgesic in first 24 hours, perioperative hemodynamic change and various side effects. Statistical Analysis used: Categorical data was compared using Chi- square test. Quantitative parametric data was analysed using unpaired student t-test. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Mean duration of analgesia in Group A (10.53 ± 2.686 hours) was longer than Group B (7.943±3.199hr) (P = 0.0006).Mean number of analgesic dosesrequired in first 24 hourswere less in Group A (1.429 ± 0.5021) ascompared to Group B (1.771±0.6897) (P = 0.0202).All patients remained hemodynamically stable with no significant side effects noted in either group. Conclusion: We conclude that preemptive analgesic efficacy of oral gabapentin 600mg is better in comparison to oral pregabalin 75 mg for patients posted for lower limb orthopedic surgeries under spinal anesthesia.

scholarly journals Epidural butorphanol for post operative analgesia in lower limb surgeries: A comparative study with epidural tramadol

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
G P Deo ◽  
S K Shrestha ◽  
I N Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Epidural Injection ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Group B

To compare the efficacy of epidural butorphanol and tramadol for post operative analgesia in lower limb surgeries. Randomized, controlled, double blind, prospective study conducted at Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Chitwan Medical College from September 1st 2015 to August 31st 2016. 60 patients of ASA Grade I and II of either sex, aged between 18-65 years willing for epidural analgesia for post operative analgesia were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group B- Butorphanol group and Group T- Tramadol group. Subjects of Group B received 2mg of Butorphanol and 0.25% Bupivacaine making a total volume of 10 ml and that of Group T received 100mg of Tramadol and 0.25% Bupivacaine also making a total volume of 10 ml. Analgesic efficacy was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The onset and duration of analgesia along with side effects were also assessed. The quality of analgesia was studied using time to independent mobilization and overall patient satisfaction. Total number of patients was 60, of ASA Grade I and II, aged between 18-65 years. The mean age of patients in Group B was 42.6±11.7 years and 46.1±11.2 years in Group T. Time of onset of analgesia after epidural injection was 7.4±0.9 minutes in Group B and 12.7±1.5 minutes in Group T and the difference was found to be statistically significant. Duration of analgesia was 317.1±99.1 minutes and 438.8±136.6 minutes in Butorphanol and Tramadol groups respectively which was also statistically significant. Sedation was significantly higher in butorphanol group whereas nausea and vomiting was higher in tramadol group. Quality of analgesia in terms of patient satisfaction was better with epidural butorphanol. Both epidural tramadol and butorphanol were effective in relieving post operative pain however butorphanol had lesser side effects and greater patient satisfaction compared to tramadol but the duration of action was relatively short.

scholarly journals Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy of Intrathecal Bupivacaine Alone with Intrathecal Bupivacaine Midazolam or Magnesium Sulphate Combination in Patients Undergoing Elective Infraumbilical Surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Attia ◽  
Amany Abo Elhussien ◽  
Mostafa Zaki
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Magnesium Sulphate ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Lower Limb Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Limited Duration

Background. Spinal anaesthesia, which is one of the techniques for infraumbilical surgeries, is most commonly criticized for limited duration of postoperative analgesia. Aim of the Work. The aim of this study was to decrease bupivacaine dose used in spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing orthopedic lower limb surgery and reduce its possible side effects. Patient and Methods. Sixty adult patients of both sexes, divided into three. Group C received 2.5 mL bupivacaine and 0.5 mL saline 0.9%. Group A received 2.5 mL bupivacaine and 0.5 mL midazolam. Group B received 2.5 mL bupivacaine and 0.5 mL magnesium sulphate. Results. As regards onset of both motor and sensory blockade, there are a significant decrease in group A and a significant increase in group B as compared to group C, with a significant decrease in duration of motor blockade and significant increase in duration of sensory blockade in both group A and group B, respectively, as compared to group C, with a significant decrease in the duration of sensory blockade in group B as compared to group C. Conclusions. These results suggested that intrathecal midazolam as an adjuvant for bupivacaine increases the duration of both sensory and motor blockade more than that of magnesium sulphate.

Evaluation of the Effect of Timolol Alone and in Combination with Hydrochlorothiazide and Amiloride in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Arterial Hypertension: A Double-Blind, Controlled Study

1976 ◽  
Vol 51 (s3) ◽  
pp. 529s-531s ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Muiesan ◽  
B. Magnani ◽  
E. Agabiti-Rosei ◽  
C. Alicandri ◽  
E. Ambrosioni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Essential Hypertension ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Moderate Essential Hypertension ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Combination Tablet ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

1. The effects of timolol alone and in combination with a fixed dose of hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride have been studied in a double-blind, controlled study in fifty-four patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. 2. After a 4 weeks placebo period patients were randomly assigned to enter groups receiving timolol alone (group A), hydrochlorothiazide + amiloride (group B) or timolol + hydrochlorothiazide + amiloride (group C). Each treatment was carried out for 6 weeks. 3. The use of timolol (10 mg), hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg) and amiloride (2·5 mg) in a combination tablet given twice daily gave better control of blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension than did equivalent dosages of timolol alone or of hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride. 4. Clinical and laboratory side effects were minimal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document