A Comparison of Incidence of Post Dural Puncture Headache Using 25G Quincke and 25G Whitacre Needle in Obstetric Patients Undergoing Caesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia

Med Phoenix ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-31
Author(s):  
Chetan Bohara ◽  
Rajesh Maharjan ◽  
Subi Regmi ◽  
Gunjan Regmi ◽  
Rajendra Kunwar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Dural Puncture ◽  
P Value ◽  
Sitting Position ◽  
Post Dural Puncture Headache ◽  
Subarachnoid Block ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia has offered a new armamentarium for the anesthesiologists and has been widely used in the Cesarean section in the field of obstetrics, an alternative to general anesthesia. However, Post Dural Puncture Headache remains an inevitable complication of spinal anesthesia and can be minimized its incidence by reducing the size of the needle and changing the design of the needle tip.  The objective of the study was to find the incidence of post-dural puncture headache undergoing subarachnoid block for CS using 25G Quincke and 25G Whitacre needles. Materials and methods: This study was conducted from August 2020 to January 2021 enrolling 72 parturients and were allocated in two groups of 36 each. Group A and B parturients received spinal anesthesia via. 25G Quincke and 25G Whitacre in sitting position respectively. All the patients were evaluated based on incidence, onset, duration, and severity of headache postoperatively for 72 hours after the subarachnoid block. Results: The incidence of post-dural puncture headache in the study was 7.2% in Group A and 3.15% in Group B which was statistically significant (P-value = 0.011), while there were no significant differences between these two groups in the onset, severity, and duration of post-dural puncture headache. Conclusion: Despite no significant differences were found for the onset, severity, and duration of post-dural puncture headache, the use of 25G Whitacre is associated with a reduced incidence of post-dural puncture headache compare to 25G Quincke.

scholarly journals Effect of Hydrocortisone on Reducing severity of Post Dural Puncture Headache after Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Caesarean Section

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 468-472
Author(s):  
Shumaila Ashfaq ◽  
Liaqat Ali ◽  
Muhammad Ashraf Zia ◽  
Rizwan Ahmad Khan ◽  
Mehtash Butt
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Conventional Treatment ◽  
Dural Puncture ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Post Dural Puncture Headache ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Spinal anesthesia is frequently used in pregnant female undergoing caesarean section due to its safety than general anaesthesia. Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is commonly occurring problem associated with spinal anaesthesia and causes a considerable morbidity. PDPH depends on several factor and various methods have been used to reduce and treat the pain of PDPH. We evaluated effects of hydrocortisone on the treatment of PDPH in obstetrical patient. To compare mean decrease in Visual Analogue Scalepain score in patients who developed PDPH after elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia who were given conventional treatment versus conventional treatment plus hydrocortisone. Double blind randomized control trial. Study conducted in department of anaesthesia and obstetrics of Allama Iqbal Medical College, Jinnah hospital (tertiary care) conducted from13th June 2014 to 13th December 2014. Sample size was calculated 60 (30 each) cases using 95% confidence interval, 80% power of test. Patients who developed PDPH after spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section were divided into 2 group; Group A (Conventional Treatment) and Group B, (Conventional Treatment plus Hydrocortisone 100mg 8 hourly for 48 hours). Details were recorded regarding age; mean pretreatment and post treatment VAS after 6 hours. Mean decrease in pain VAS score was 3.30 + 1.2 in group A while 7.17+ 1.3 in group B. (P value 0.001). Intravenous hydrocortisone is more effective in reducing post dural puncture headache pain severity after spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section when given along with conventional treatment as compared to conventional treatment alone.

scholarly journals Incidence of post dural puncture headache in parturients following early ambulation and recumbency

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
Niroj Hirachan
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Dural Puncture ◽  
Muscle Relaxation ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Early Ambulation ◽  
Post Dural Puncture Headache ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Group A

Introductions: Spinal anesthesia is a safe and acceptable technique for patients undergoing caesarean section because it provides both excellent analgesia and muscle relaxation. Post Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) is frequently reported complication after spinal anesthesia. This study evaluates the incidence of PDPH following early mobilization and recumbency after caesarean section. Methods: This prospective, randomized comparative interventional study included 100 parturients women of age 18 to 45 years, ASA I and II, randomly divided into two groups – Ambulatory ‘A’ and Recumbent ‘R’. At the end of caesarean section, patients were advised to either lie in recumbent position for 24 hours or mobilize as soon as they become ambulatory after spinal aneshthesia. Occurrence of headache were recorded at 24 hours, 72 hours and 7th day. Software SPSS 16, chi-square test was used for proportions like incidence and severity of PDPH; p<0.05 was taken as significant. Results: The incidence of PDPH was statistically not different (p = 0.361) in Group R 8% (4 patients) and in Group A 6% (3 patients). In both the groups, the severity of headache was mild to moderate with only mild headaches in the Group A (p = 0.549). Conclusions: Early ambulation following spinal anesthesia for caesarean section did not increase the incidence of PDPH in parturients.  

Comparison of the effects of Dexamethasone and Ondansetron on the Reduction of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting following Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash karimi ◽  
Jahanbakhsh Nejadi ◽  
Mahnaz Shamseh ◽  
Nooshin Ronasi ◽  
Mehdi Birjandi
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication associated with the use of anesthesia. Several antiemetics are used to reduce the incidence and severity of PONV. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of dexamethasone and ondansetron to treat PONV in patients undergoing cesarean section (c-section) under spinal anesthesia. Methods: This double-blind clinical trial study was performed on patients who were referred to the operating room of Haji Karim Asali Hospital of Khorramabad for elective cesarean section in 2016-17. Upon meeting the inclusion criteria, patients were allotted into two groups (n=60). Group A received 8mg of dexamethasone and group B received 4mg of ondansetron after spinal anesthesia. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaire and Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale (DASS) questionnaire was used for the analysis. Patients with mild to moderate stress, anxiety, and depression were included in the study. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16 software. Results: There was no difference in the demographic data of the two groups. The mean severity of nausea in group A was significantly higher than in group B. The frequency of vomiting in group A was 20 times higher than group B, which was found to be statistically significant, p = 0.018. Concerning the type of delivery with the frequency of nausea, the results showed that the frequency of nausea in group A was 3.24 times higher than group B, however, this difference was not statistically significant, p = 0.106. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, ondansetron had a significant effect on the alleviation of postoperative nausea and vomiting, as compared to dexamethasone in c-section surgical candidates.

scholarly journals Comparison of the effects of sagittal versus transvers 25-gauge quincke needle insertion on post-dural puncture headache development

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 554-559
Author(s):  
Mehmet Tercan ◽  
Tuğba Bingöl Tanrıverdi ◽  
Gülçin Patmano ◽  
Ahmet Atlas ◽  
Ahmet Kaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Dura Mater ◽  
Dural Puncture ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Needle Insertion ◽  
Spinal Needle ◽  
Post Dural Puncture Headache ◽  
Spinal Puncture ◽  
American Society

Objective: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most important complications after spinal anesthesia. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the sagittal or transverse application of 25-gauge Quincke spinal needle on PDPH development in patients undergoing cesarean section. Material and Methods: A total of 295 patients with a planned cesarean section between the ages of 18-40 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 1 or 2 were included in the study. For the spinal intervention, 25-gauge Quincke spinal needle was used in all patients. Patients were included in one of two groups according to the spinal needle cutting direction of the dura mater fibers as sagittal (parallel to dura mater fibers, Group S; n=145) or transverse group (perpendicular to dura mater fibers, Group T; n=150). Results: PDPH developed in 27 (9.2%) patients. Patients in Group T had significant higher ratio of PDPH compared to patients in Group S (16% vs. 2.1%, p<0.001). Additionally, patients with PDPH had a significantly higher frequency of ≥2 spinal puncture attempts compared to patients without PDPH (22.2% vs. 4.5%, p=0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that transverse needle direction (OR: 11.40, 95% CI: 2.73-34.71; p<0.001) and ≥2 spinal puncture attempts (OR: 9.73, 95% CI: 3.13-41.55; p<0.001) and were independent predictors for PDPH development. Conclusion: Transverse insertion of the 25-gauge Quincke needle into spinal cord fibers and repeated interventions are independently associated with the development of PDPH in cesarean section patients undergoing spinal anesthesia

scholarly journals TO DETERMINE EFFICACY OF GRANISETRON VERSUS PLACEBO FOR REDUCING SHIVERING IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER SEGMENT CAESAREAN SECTION UNDER SPINAL ANAESTHESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 530-34
Author(s):  
Sana Abbas ◽  
Bilal Yasin ◽  
Basit Mehmood Khan ◽  
Umer Hayat ◽  
Beenish Abbas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Intravenous Bolus ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To determine the efficacy of granisetron versus placebo (saline) for reducing shivering in patients undergoing lower segment caeserian section under spinal anaesthesia. Study Design: Comparative cross - sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi, from Apr to Sep 2019. Methodology: Total 178 patients undergoing lower segment ceaserian section under spinal anaesthesia with age ranges from 18-40 years of American Society of Anaesthesiologists status I & II with full term pregnancy scheduled for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Group A (n=92) received an intravenous bolus of 1 mg granisetron in a 10ml syringe and Group B (n=86) received intravenous bolus of normal saline in a 10ml syringe, drugs were administered immediately before spinal anaesthesia by anaesthetist as coded syringes. Heart rate, blood pressure, core body temperature and shivering scores were measured at 0 minutes, 30 minutes and 60 minutes, average surgery time recorded to be 60 minutes. Results: None of the patients in group A (drug group) exhibited appreciable post spinal shivering whereas 25 (29%) in group B (placebo) had clinically significant shivering necessitated administration of other established pharmacological agents to abort shivering in order to ensure patient comfort and satisfaction with statistically significant p-value of <0.05. Conclusion: Prophylactic injection granisetron was efficacious against post spinal shivering, moreover provides worth while relief of nausea and vomiting which is dilemma with most of the drugs employed for control of post spinal shivering.

scholarly journals Effect of pre-administration with aminophylline on the occurrence of post-dural puncture headache in women undergoing caesarean section by combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 420-426
Author(s):  
Chao-Jie Yang ◽  
Tao Chen ◽  
Xin Ni ◽  
Wan-You Yu ◽  
Wei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Epidural Anaesthesia ◽  
Dural Puncture ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Post Dural Puncture Headache ◽  
Combined Spinal Epidural ◽  
Group A ◽  
Spinal Epidural

Objective To investigate the effect of the pre-administration with aminophylline on the occurrence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in women undergoing caesarean section by combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (CSEA). Methods The study enrolled women undergoing elective caesarean sections with CSEA and randomly allocated them into two groups; for 30 min immediately after the infant was delivered, group A received 250 mg aminophylline intravenously and group B received an equal volume of normal saline. Demographic data, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative transfusion volume and the occurrence of PDPH during the first 7 days after the operation were recorded. Side-effects such as hypersensitivity, convulsion and arrhythmia were also recorded in the patients and infants in group A within 24 h after aminophylline administration. Results A total of 120 patients aged 24–38 years (pregnancy range, 38–42 weeks) were randomly allocated into two groups ( n = 60). The incidence of PDPH in group A was significantly lower than group C (two of 59 [3.4%] versus 10 of 58 [17.2%], respectively). There were no related side-effects within 24 h after aminophylline administration in group A. Conclusions Intraoperative intravenous infusion of 250 mg aminophylline reduced the incidence of PDPH after caesarean section under CSEA with no side-effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document