scholarly journals Zgoda na korzystanie z aparatu telefonicznego przez tymczasowo aresztowanego w świetle rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 grudnia 2016 roku

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-25
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Florek
Keyword(s):  
Lower Order ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Common ◽  
Public Prosecution Service

The present work discusses the problems associated with the limiting of the rights of a temporarily arrested person in the light of the regulation of the minister of justice issued on 22 December 2016. In the statutory act of law, i.e. the provision Art. 217 c §2 kkw, the legislator regulated the substantive limitations associated with the use of a phone by the person who was temporarily arrested. However, the solutions contained in the regulation of the minister of justice which was instituted, and more specifically §25 of this document, introduce substantive limitations. As a consequence, a situation is brought about in which the rights of an individual are limited in a lower-order legal act, which infringes the constitutional values of a state of law. Moreover, the article presents an interpretation of the provisions Art. 217 §2 kkw and §317 of the regulations of the minister of justice issued on 23 December 2015 – The rules and regulations of the operation of the courts of law and §190 of the regulations of the minister of justice issued on 7 April 2016 – The rules and regulations of the internal operation of the common organisational units of the public prosecution service.

Cassatieberoepen tegen criminele vonnissen en arresten in het Leiedepartement, 1796-1813

2020 ◽  
Vol 88 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 179-210
Author(s):  
J. Monballyu
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Court ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Prosecution Service

Summary In the department of the Lys, the cassation appeal against criminal judgments was introduced in 1796 and could be made by both the criminal convicts and the Public Prosecution Service. The first cassation appeal was lodged on 5 May 1796 and the last on 18 December 1813. In total, 187 (24%) of the 779 criminal judgments were appealed in cassation, in 172 cases by 319 criminal convicts and in 15 cases by the Public Prosecution Service. Of those 187 cassation appeals, 167 (89.3%) were rejected and 20 (10.7%) were accepted. In the latter cases, this led to the annulment of the contested judgment and, in most cases, the criminal proceedings were (partially) repeated for an equivalent, nearby criminal court.

scholarly journals La Fiscalía española ¿Debe ser una institución independiente?

2018 ◽  
pp. 157
Author(s):  
Juan Luis Gómez Colomer
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Investigation ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
Adversarial System ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
The Government ◽  
Adversarial Model ◽  
Do So

El Ministerio Fiscal español tiene ante todo un problema de identidad orgánica. Se desea que sea independiente del Gobierno, pero las normas confirman una cierta dependencia. El Ministerio Fiscal debe ser dependiente del Gobierno si se consuma la reforma hacia un modelo adversarial de enjuiciamiento criminal, porque ésa es la naturaleza que mejor cuadra con dicho sistema, en donde el acusado sabe que enfrente tiene a la Administración, que, cumpliendo con su deber público, le exige con todo su poder responsabilidad por sus actos. Hasta que se produzca el cambio, es mejor dejar las cosas como están. El Ministerio Fiscal no debe instruir el proceso penal ni dirigir la investigación del crimen mientras no tengamos el antedicho sistema adversarial vigente en España. Sería constitucional si lo hiciera, pero no está probado que esté preparado para hacerlo, y probablemente, a pesar de declaraciones oficiales, no desee asumir ahora esa responsabilidad. Con las normas y la práctica actual, correría el peligro de ser visualizado en los casos más importantes como un órgano no objetivo.The Spanish Public Prosecution Service has, foremost, a problem of organic identity. It is believed that it should be independent from the Government, but the laws confirm some degree of dependence. The Public Prosecution should depend on the Government if the reform toward an adversarial model of criminal procedure is pursued, because that is the nature that best fits a system in which the defendant knows he is facing an Administration that, fulfilling its public duty, is demanding with all its powers that he takes responsibility for his actions. Until the change is produced, it is better to leave things as they are. The Public Prosecution Service should not direct the criminal investigation while the foresaid adversarial system in not in force in Spain. If it did, it would be constitutional, but it has not been demonstrated that it is ready to do so and, probably, in spite of official declarations, the Public Prosecution does not want now to assume that responsibility. With the current laws and practices, the Prosecution Service would be in danger of being taken as a non-objective organ in the most important cases.

scholarly journals THE ROLE OF PROSECUTOR OFFICE IN THE ERADICATION OF CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTS IN INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 244
Author(s):  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih ◽  
Agus Sunaryo
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Police Agency ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
The Republic

In fact, there are still many cases of corruption that have not been revealed; this resulted in the public to be pessimistic with the seriousness of the Prosecutor Office in uncovering variouscases of corruption that are happening today. The purpose of this study is to know the role ofthe Prosecutor Office in the eradication of criminal acts, to obtain an overview of the mechanismof corruption handling by prosecutors in Indonesia and to analyze the obstacles and solutionsin eradicating crime in the Attorney General. The research method was sociological juridical,and data collection were gained by using observation and interview. The existence and role ofthe Public Prosecution Service in eradicating corruption crime begins when the case has notbeen transferred to the Court until the execution of the decision of the Court. However, in thecriminal act of corruption the Prosecutor’s Office has the authority as a public prosecutor aswell as an investigator. The authority of the prosecutor as a special criminal investigator shall beregulated by Law Number 16 Year 2004 regarding the Attorney of the Republic of Indonesia inArticle 30 paragraph (1) letter d. In addition, in its role against the eradication of corruption, theProsecutor’s Office has always conducted a coordination relationship with the Police Agency andthe Corruption Eradication Commission. The mechanism for handling corruption in the AttorneyGeneral Office, through several procedures already set out in the law includes Investigation,Investigation and Prosecution.

scholarly journals Public Prosecutors to Defend the Public Interest

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 301-316
Author(s):  
José P. Ribeiro de Albuquerque
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
Legal Representation ◽  
Constitutional Review ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Social ◽  
Legal Model ◽  
Public Prosecution Service

The preconditions for the question I want to address today are the social skills, duties and responsibilities of the Portuguese Public Prosecution Service. It is an independent and autonomous judicial body, based on a constitutional and legal model that confers functions on the Public Prosecution Service encompassing not only criminal prosecution and participation in the implementation of the criminal policy, but also the legal representation for employees, the promotion and protection of the welfare of children and young people, as well as the protection of collective and diffuse interests (environment, urban planning, public health, etc.), the safeguarding of the judicial independence and of the law, the enforcement of judicial decisions, the constitutional review and the promotion of the public interest. It is in the Public Prosecution´s powers of initiative in the public interest that I would like to focus on.

The Effectiveness of the Supervision of the Prosecutor's Commission in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iswantoro Iswantoro ◽  
Rian Saputra ◽  
Anggo Doyoharjo ◽  
Resti Dian Luthviati
Keyword(s):  
Attorney General ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
The Republic

<table width="593" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="366"><p><em>This study aims to analyze the causes of the ineffective supervision carried out by the Prosecutor's Commission in an effort to improve the performance of the Public Prosecutors Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The facts show that there are many negative public reports and complaints regarding the performance of the AGO. These reports are examined first, before being given a recommendation to the Attorney General. As the external supervisor of the Public Prosecution Service, the Prosecutor's Commission has the task of supervising, monitoring and evaluating the behavior of prosecutors and public prosecutors. The existence of the Republican Prosecutor's Commission is experiencing weaknesses in carrying out its duties and authorities</em><em>.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong></p><p><em>Prosecutor's Commissioner; Effectiveness; Indonesia.</em></p></td></tr></tbody></table>

scholarly journals An inquiry into the blurring boundaries between professionals and paraprofessionals in Dutch courts and the public prosecution service

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
N.L. Holvast ◽  
J.M.W. Lindeman
Keyword(s):  
Public Management ◽  
New Public Management ◽  
Medical Profession ◽  
Division Of Labour ◽  
Work Processes ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
Legal Professionals ◽  
The Public ◽  
New Public ◽  
Public Prosecution Service

Abstract The autonomous position of legal professionals is no longer self-evident. Professionals are under increased pressure to reform. This phenomenon is not only true for legal professionals. A broader trend – which is recognised for the medical profession, academic profession and alike – is that paraprofessionals are gaining a more prominent position. In this paper, we focus on the developments in the Dutch public justice system. We conduct a case-study on the role of paraprofessionals in courts and in the public prosecution service – two understudied legal institutions in this regard. By drawing on empirical data unfolding the working routine of the judiciary and the prosecution service, we find two paradigms that define the thinking about professionalism: a traditional ‘pure professional’ paradigm and a new, more hybrid paradigm that includes (policy-based) managerial thinking. The latter appears to be enhanced by a New Public Management (NPM) approach within these institutions. Although we observe resistance among (para)professionals towards professional changes and ambiguity in the relationships between professionals and paraprofessionals, we also observe that managerialism has changed the work processes and the division of labour between professionals and paraprofessionals.

The Public Prosecution Service

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacki Sleator
Keyword(s):  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Prosecution Service

AbstractJacki Sleator outlines the origins of the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) and how the organisation made its transition from a small organisation to one of the biggest legal departments in N Ireland.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document