Electrochemical detection methods for biologically-active molecules

1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence E. Welch
Keyword(s):  
Electrochemical Detection ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Detection Methods

Localization of Chromogranins, Non-neuron-specific Enolase, and Different Forms of Somatostatins in the Submandibular Salivary Glands of Mice

1990 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 1494-1499 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Letić-Gavrilović ◽  
K. Abe
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Salivary Glands ◽  
Chromogranin A ◽  
Neuron Specific Enolase ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Duct System ◽  
Male Mice ◽  
Chromogranin B ◽  
Submandibular Salivary Glands

The localizations of chromogranins A, B, and C, neuron-specific enolase (NSE, γγ-type) and non-NSE (αα-type), and different forms of somatostatins were immunocytochemically identified. The localizations were compared with those of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and nerve growth factor (NGF) in the submandibular salivary glands (SMG) of male mice at five to six weeks of age, with use of a variety of antibodies and the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) and avidin-biotin complex (ABC) detection methods. In the SMG of male mice, the major chromogranin present was chromogranin A, whereas chromogranins B and C were not detected at these ages by either method. Chromogranin Alike immunoreactivity was located in the granular convoluted tubule (GCT) cells of the SMG, whereas non-NSE immunoreactivity was observed throughout the duct system and in some acinar-associated cells. NSE was not detected in any part of the SMG. The distribution of chromogranin A and somatostatins in the GCT cells was similar to that of EGF and NGF. Our results strongly suggest that chromogranin A and somatostatins, but not chromogranin B or C, may be useful as a means of differentiation of the cells in the duct system of the SMG responsible for the production of biologically-active factors.

scholarly journals Multiplexed Detection of Sepsis Markers in Whole Blood using Nanocomposite Coated Electrochemical Sensors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uroš Zupančič ◽  
Pawan Jolly ◽  
Pedro Estrela ◽  
Despina Moschou ◽  
Donald E. Ingber
Keyword(s):  
Electrochemical Detection ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Electrochemical Sensors ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Sample Volume ◽  
Nanocomposite Coating ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Undiluted Serum

ABSTRACTSepsis is a leading cause of mortality worldwide that is difficult to diagnose and manage because this requires simultaneous analysis of multiple biomarkers. Electrochemical detection methods could potentially provide a way to accurately quantify multiple sepsis biomarkers in a multiplexed manner as they have very low limits of detection and require minimal sensor instrumentation; however, affinity-based electrochemical sensors are usually hampered by biological fouling. Here we describe development of an electrochemical detection platform that enables detection of multiple sepsis biomarkers simultaneously by incorporating a recently developed nanocomposite coating composed of crosslinked bovine serum albumin containing a network of reduced graphene oxide nanoparticles that prevents biofouling. Using nanocomposite coated planar gold electrodes, we constructed a procalcitonin sensor and demonstrated sensitive PCT detection in undiluted serum and clinical samples, as well as excellent correlation with a conventional ELISA (adjusted r2 = 0.95). Sensors for two additional sepsis biomarkers — C-reactive protein and pathogen-associated molecular patterns — were developed on the same multiplexed platform and tested in whole blood. Due to the excellent antifouling properties of the nanocomposite coating, all three sensors exhibited specific responses within the clinically significant range without any cross-reactivity in the same channel with low sample volume. This platform enables sensitive simultaneous electrochemical detection of multiple analytes in human whole blood, which can be expanded further to any target analyte with an appropriate antibody pair or capturing probe, and thus, may offer a potentially valuable tool for development of clinical point-of-care diagnostics.GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

scholarly journals Development of HPLC-chemi luminescent and HPLC-electrochemical detection methods for histamine and NT-methylhistanine.

1994 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Md. Khorshed Alan ◽  
Masayuki Sasaki ◽  
Takehiko Watanabe ◽  
Kazutaka Maeyama
Keyword(s):  
Electrochemical Detection ◽  
Detection Methods

scholarly journals Citrus Essential Oils (CEOs) and Their Applications in Food: An Overview

Plants ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Himashree Bora ◽  
Madhu Kamle ◽  
Dipendra Kumar Mahato ◽  
Pragya Tiwari ◽  
Pradeep Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Essential Oils ◽  
Antimicrobial Properties ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Optimum Dose ◽  
Food Applications ◽  
Citrus Essential Oils

Citrus is a genus belonging to the Rutaceae family and includes important crops like orange, lemons, pummelos, grapefruits, limes, etc. Citrus essential oils (CEOs) consist of some major biologically active compounds like α-/β-pinene, sabinene, β-myrcene, d-limonene, linalool, α-humulene, and α-terpineol belonging to the monoterpenes, monoterpene aldehyde/alcohol, and sesquiterpenes group, respectively. These compounds possess several health beneficial properties like antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, etc., in addition to antimicrobial properties, which have immense potential for food applications. Therefore, this review focused on the extraction, purification, and detection methods of CEOs along with their applications for food safety, packaging, and preservation. Further, the concerns of optimum dose and safe limits, their interaction effects with various food matrices and packaging materials, and possible allergic reactions associated with the use of CEOs in food applications were briefly discussed, which needs to be addressed in future research along with efficient, affordable, and “green” extraction methods to ensure CEOs as an ecofriendly, cost-effective, and natural alternative to synthetic chemical preservatives.

Evaluation of an In Vitro Bioassay for the Detection of Purified Ricin and Castor Bean in Beverages and Liquid Food Matrices

2007 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 2377-2382 ◽  
Author(s):  
JENNIFER L. BRZEZINSKI ◽  
DAVID L. CRAFT
Keyword(s):  
Castor Bean ◽  
Colorimetric Assay ◽  
Cell Damage ◽  
Jurkat Cells ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Mouse Bioassay ◽  
Animal Testing ◽  
Vitro Assay

The potential use of ricin as a biological weapon in food highlights the necessity for the development of food-specific detection methods. Current methods for the detection of ricin consist of various immunoassays, which detect only one subunit of the ricin toxin and therefore may not be indicative of a biologically active molecule. An in vivo assay, such as a mouse bioassay, can indicate the biological activity of the toxin; however, this method is not feasible for laboratories that do not have animal testing facilities. The purpose of this study was to develop an in vitro assay for the detection of biologically active ricin in beverages and liquid foods. Acidic and high-protein beverages were spiked with either purified ricin or ground castor beans and added to cultured human Jurkat cells. After an overnight incubation, the supernatant was tested for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity with a colorimetric assay. LDH was released from the cytosol upon cell damage and was positively correlated with cell death. Ricin was detectable in all the matrices tested, with a sensitivity of 10 to 100 pg/ml. Biologically active ricin was detectable in all the matrices incubated with ground castor bean material. This method provides a confirmatory way to detect biologically active ricin that can be utilized by laboratories lacking animal facilities.

Detection of pollutants in water bodies: electrochemical detection or photo-electrochemical detection?

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (93) ◽  
pp. 14541-14552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Li ◽  
Mingshan Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Electrochemical Detection ◽  
Environmental Pollutants ◽  
Water Bodies ◽  
Detection Methods

Both electrochemical and photo-electrochemical detection methods have been widely used for the detection of environmental pollutants, but which one is better?

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document