scholarly journals UTILIZATION OF F-AHP METHOD IN BRI FOR GIVING SELECTION OF KUR

Telematika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Meiyanto Eko Sulisyo ◽  
Ristu Saptono

Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI) is a business entity which collects funds from the public in the form of deposits and distribute to the public in the form of the People 's Business Credit (KUR) or loan. Along with over time after KUR realized, there is no doubt BRI will be faced with the problems of risk, namely the risk of KUR problematic. There are several methods that can be used in making a decision to be able to solve the problem include the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).AHP is used when the decision involves many factors, where the decision had difficulty in making the weight of each factor. Despite this problem the use of AHP in Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach has less to cope with uncertainties taken by decision-makers, when it should give a definite value in the pairwise comparison matrix therefore, to overcome the weaknesses of the existing AHP then developed a method namely Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP). F-AHP method is the combination between fuzzy AHP approach. The results of research conducted using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) has a 100 % accuracy this is evidenced by the results obtained together with the calculation of banking. Calculation banking mention of 20 customers, acquired 14 accepted and rejected 6.

Author(s):  
G. Marimuthu ◽  
G. Ramesh

Decisions usually involve the getting the best solution, selecting the suitable experiments, most appropriate judgments, taking the quality results etc., using some techniques.  Every decision making can be considered as the choice from the set of alternatives based on a set of criteria.  The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is a multi-criteria decision making and is dealing with decision making problems through pairwise comparisons mode [10].  The weight vectors from this comparison model are obtained by using extent analysis method.  This paper concern with an alternate method of finding the weight vectors from the original fuzzy AHP decision model (moderate fuzzy AHP model), that has the same rank as obtained in original fuzzy AHP and ideal fuzzy AHP decision models.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanndon A. Ocampo

This article intends to integrate sustainability and the classical manufacturing strategy (MS) into a coherent hierarchical decision-making framework that identifies the content of a sustainable MS using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (fuzzy AHP). Instead of using the traditional fundamental scale of the AHP, linguistic variables with equivalent triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs) are used to elucidate judgement of elements in pairwise comparisons. AHP, as a widely adopted tool in multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problems, effectively handles the subjectivity and comprehensiveness of decision-making complexity that is structured hierarchically. Domain experts in MS and sustainability were asked to elicit judgement in AHP pairwise comparison approach. Results show the content strategy of the nine decision categories in manufacturing that addresses sustainability and competitiveness. A priority list of decisions is also presented which may guide decision-makers in resource allocation, medium- and long-range planning, and in formulating strategic initiatives. The main contribution of this article is the formulation of a sustainable MS from a hybrid approach that captures uncertainty and subjectivity in decision-making.


2021 ◽  
Vol 280 ◽  
pp. 10004
Author(s):  
Mallika Joshi ◽  
Pankaj Kumar ◽  
Purabi Sarkar

Watershed prioritization has become increasingly crucial for managing natural resources, especially the watersheds. A useful decision support tool to provide appropriate weights to different morphological attributes with lineage with soil erosion is required to identify environmentally stressed areas for the watershed resources. This study examines the Western Nayar watershed delineation and further examination of the watershed’s morphometric parameters. The morphometric parameters were quantified under the linear, areal, and relief heads for the watershed. The prioritization of sub-watersheds was done by the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). The study included nine morphometric parameters for forming a pairwise comparison matrix. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process was employed for assigning the suitable weights to morphometric parameters, and further, these weights are normalized to assign the final ranks to the sub-watershed. In Western Nayar, SW9 got the highest priority, and SW1 was categorized as the least priority. The results were validated by the consistency ratio index, which depends on the matrix consistency index’s size that should be less than 10%. The consistency index of the present study was found to be 2%.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imam Setiadi ◽  
Dinda Rita K. Hartaja

Selection of the appropriate composition desalination units can be done with a variety of method approaches, one of the method is the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In determining the desalination unit with AHP method to consider is setting a goal, an alternative criteria and pairwise comparison. Research for the determination of the exact composition of the desalination unit in order to achieve sustainable drinking water suppy in coastal areas and small islands has been conducted. The results of the study are as follows, the energy demand of 50.83%, operator costs of 26.64%, maintenance costs of 14.13% and chemical requirement 8.4%. For an alternative composition desalination unit of RO 10 m3 / day is the best alternative composition with value of 59.61%, the composition of the next alternative is RO 20 m3/ day of 30.40% and the last alternative of the desalination unit composition is RO 120 m3/ day of 09.99%.Key words : Desalination, Mukti Stage Flash Composition, AHP


Techno Com ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-189
Author(s):  
Siti Monalisa ◽  
Raynaldi Setiawan

BMT Al-ittihad terdapat bermacam-macam pembiayaan  salah satunya Murabahah yang berarti akad jual beli barang dengan menyatakan harga perolehan dan keuntungan (margin) yang disepakati oleh penjual dan pembeli. BMT Al-itthad dalam proses melaksanakan akad Murabahah dilakukan dengan menganalisa kelayakan pemberian pembiayaan kepada anggota dengan cara melengkapi persyaratan umum dan menggunakan bahasa yang subjektif terhadap penilaian kriteria karakter berdasarkan rekomendasi anggota lain,wawancara dan cara berkomunikasi, Penilaian karakter merupakan penilaian yang paling penting berdasarkan hasil wawancara dengan kepala pembiayaan karena penilaian karakter merupakan penilaian untuk melihat apakah anggota sanggup dan amanah membayar hutang. Untuk mengatasi penilaian yang bersifat subjektif maka dirancang sebuah sistem pendukung keputusan pemberian pembiayaan dengan menggunakan metode fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Metode fuzzy AHP merupakan penggabungan dari metode fuzzy dan AHP. Metode fuzzy AHP dapat menutupi kelemahan yang terdapat pada AHP yaitu menangani penilaian yang bersifat subjektif . Sistem ini dirancang menggunakan bahasa pemrograman PHP, MySQL , sedangkan metode pengembangan sistem menggunakan V-model dan UML sebagai standar pemodelannya. Sistem pendukung keputusan  ini dapat memudahkan serta mempercepat proses penentuan pemberian pembiayaan Murabahah kepada anggota.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 79-87
Author(s):  
V.M. Romanchuk

The Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a popular method for solving multi-criteria problems. However, the problem of the adequacy of the AHP method is not solved. Opponents of the Analytic hierarchy process believe that the AHP as a whole is erroneous and cannot be applied in practice. Proponents of the method believe that the disadvantages of the method are compensated by a simple measurement procedure. In this paper, a modification of the AHP method is proposed. A mathematical model of measurement is formulated, which contains a built-in mechanism for checking adequacy. moreover, the measurement method is preserved, and the calculation algorithm becomes even simpler. The fact is that the Analytic hierarchy process is based on the assumption that the scale of relations can be obtained by pairwise comparison using numerical judgments based on the absolute scale of numbers. Fechner’s psychophysical law is considered as a justification for the existence of the scale of relations. But there are not one, but two psychophysical laws. The existence of two psychophysical laws is a problem of psychophysics. This problem can be solved by the rating method. To overcome the disadvantages of the Analytic hierarchy process, it is also proposed to use the rating method. The use of the rating method makes it possible to use the fundamental scale of the AHP method. As an example, the problem is solved using the traditional AHP scale.


2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsung-Lin Lee

In this paper, the application of the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) combined with a set of criteria analysis for the selection of appropriate sites for the development offshore wind energy in Taiwan is presented. The Fuzzy AHP was first conducted to rank the importance and identify the key factors of offshore wind energy successfully. From the numerical results, eight key factors that must be considered in the site selection of offshore wind energy system in Taiwan were obtained by using Fuzzy AHP model. They are: wind power, earthquakes, land use, shore type, typhoon, distance to shoreline, flight safety and water depth. Based on these factors, a set of criteria for the selection of sites for offshore wind farms was also established using five different sites in Taiwan. From the assessment results, it was found that Changhua coastal region is an appropriate site for offshore wind energy in Taiwan.


Author(s):  
Michele Fedrizzi ◽  
Jana Krejčí

In the last 30 years, several distinguished researchers have proposed and discussed different fuzzy versions of well-known Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The paper recently published by K. Zhü in the European Journal of Operational Research heavily criticizes the fuzzy approaches to AHP, claiming the fallacy of all of them. Therefore, it seems to be necessary to clarify whether the criticisms are well-founded or not. The present paper aims to rebut Zhü's claims by showing that the evidences and the reasonings in his paper are very poor and far from proving the fallacy of fuzzy AHP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document